Rubicon combined report

How households say their lives changed, and what "Organisation 1" contributed: a QuIP study of 18 households

5 questions · 13 October 2026

This report answers five questions from 18 documents. Each answer was reached and checked separately. Its numbers were counted from what people said in the documents rather than estimated by the AI, and every quotation is word for word. How each answer was reached is set out in the annexes at the end.

Question 1 of 5

Paths from "Organisation 1" to household income and food

Question By what paths do households say "Organisation 1"'s activities led to changes in household income and production and in food and diet, and how many households, out of the 15 whose interviews name "Organisation 1", have such a path that passes through better household health?

The answer builds on the earlier answer about what influences brought about changes in household health (8 October 2026, latest revision 10 October 2026), taking its classification of which programme organisation each interview names and its coded health passages and links as they stand. Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each), counted out of the 15 that name "Organisation 1", with all 18 also shown; a household can count under several paths and sources. A path starts where a passage itself names "Organisation 1" as the source. Paths are joined from one household's own links across its passages, never across households, and are reported beside the chains a respondent tells whole in one passage. A path passes through better health only where the same household has both a link into household health and a link from household health to income, production, food or diet. Weak passages are counted apart from firm ones and never added to them. Answers to closed questions are context, never evidence of a cause. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks.

Most households in "Organisation 1"'s area trace a path from its activities to better income and production () and to better food and diet (). The paths run mainly through farming practices and through savings. Food usually improves because the household produces, sells or earns more. None of these households explicitly says that its path ran through better health: the link from health to food appears only implicitly, in 4 of these households, as the reason given for a change in diet (, ). Among these households, health appears as an explicit cause of income or food only where illness held them back (), and no household links that illness to "Organisation 1".

18 interviews in 2 groups · 869 passages coded · 13 October 2026 · Run 2026-10-13-4nqp

  • Verification in this report:
  • 20 numbers, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI. Click any number to see who it counts.
  • 869 quotations, every one found word for word in its interview. Click an interview's ID beside a quotation to read it in place.
  • 40 findings and 5 high-level findings, every one checked against the interviews after they were coded a second time.

The counts are of households, out of the households whose interviews name "Organisation 1" (). The others, , and , name only "Organisation 2" () (). Where a count is out of all the households, it says so.

The paths "Organisation 1" starts

Farming practices are the commonest first step. credit "Organisation 1" with a change in how they plant, space, fertilise or store their crops, as in "Organisation 1 taught us how to plant and how to harvest in the best manner" (). , out of all the households, tell the whole chain from "Organisation 1" through farming practices to production in one passage, such as "I got dedicated to these good practices in agriculture (learned from Organisation 1) and I now earn more money" (, , ).

Savings and money management are the second route. credit "Organisation 1" with how they save or control spending. Several of them say that this changed what the household earns or can buy: "Yes, the amount of things that my family buys has changed because I now know how to save money" (, , ). In two households the savings carry food through the hungry season or a poor harvest (, ).

Some households also credit "Organisation 1" for their income directly, with no practice named between: , out of all the households, do so, for example "with the lessons learnt from Organisation 1 I now produce more and I now have a good income" (, , ).

From income to food

Food improves mostly as a result of income. Among the households naming "Organisation 1", have a path from production and income to diet. The respondents put it in terms of buying: "I can buy other meals because I produce more and sell more" (, , ). Only tells the whole chain from "Organisation 1" through farming and production to food in one passage (); the rest of these paths are joined from separate passages in the same interview § The paths "Organisation 1" starts.

"Organisation 1" is also credited for diet directly, mostly for teaching on feeding children and on varying meals: , out of all the households, do so explicitly, and 4 more only implicitly. One example: "I believe yes because they have eaten 3 meals a day as learned from Organisation 1" (, , ).

The figure below shows the links on the paths from "Organisation 1" to income and food, each traced within one household's own account.

Drawing the map with Graphviz, which loads from the internet the first time a report is opened.

Each arrow is a causal link; its number is how many sources mention it. Click an arrow or a box to read its passages.

holds the documents’ full text

Whether the path passes through better health

Health lies on many of these households' paths, but as an end and not as a step towards income or food. have a path from "Organisation 1" to better household health, mostly through hygiene and diet, as the earlier health answer found. In none of them is better health an explicit cause of higher income or better food. In 4 of these households (, , and ), the reason line under a diet question names good health, as in "The motive for this is the state in which my children are found, healthy and they have good health" (, , , ). These passages put health beside the change in diet without saying that one brought about the other. They may equally describe health as a result of the better diet.

Where health works as a cause, it works against income and food. In , illness stopped farm work and cut the food the household could get: "We all get sick and when this happened everything is affected and put on hold" () (, ). In , illness stopped the household saving (). Neither household traces that illness to "Organisation 1".

Changes for the worse

No household puts a fall in income or food down to "Organisation 1". Most falls are put down to rain and storms: "Because the rains were irregular, sometimes the rain would not pour at all" (, ). Others are put down to illness (, above), chickens dying of sickness (), theft from the barn (), a lack of sales and of crop varieties to plant (), land that has lost its fertility (), and, implicitly, a lack of dialogue in the family (). credits "Organisation 1" with a change in how it stores grain, yet its production fell because of the rain () § The paths "Organisation 1" starts.

Limitations

A path joined from separate passages in one interview is the analyst's connection, not a chain the respondent told. Fewer households tell such chains whole (, out of all the households, through farming to production) than have a path from "Organisation 1" to better income joined across their passages (, out of the households whose interviews name it). The health links come unchanged from the earlier health answer, so the two answers rest on the same reading of those passages and are not independent evidence of each other. The interviews do not ask whether health affected income or food; a household that did not mention a link may simply not have been prompted to. The finding that the path does not pass through health therefore says what households volunteered, not that the link is absent.

The finding that no household's path explicitly passes through better health rests on holding the four reason lines that name good health under a diet question as implicit (4: , , , ). Read as explicit, each of those households would have a link from health to diet, and the answer would become that up to four households have such a path.

Annex 3: how this answer was reached · The questions

Question 2 of 5

What changed household wellbeing, and the part family relationships play

Question What do households say changed their overall wellbeing, through which paths, and what part do relationships within the family (between spouses, and between generations) play along those paths: as a cause, as something that changed, or both?

The answer builds on the answer about paths from "Organisation 1" to household income and food (13 October 2026), taking its coding of what changed income, food, family relationships and wellbeing, and on the earlier answer about influences on household health (8 October 2026, latest revision 13 October 2026), taking its coded health links and its classification of which programme organisation each interview names, all as they stand. Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each), counted out of all 18, with the 15 whose interviews name "Organisation 1" shown; a household can count under several paths. A change in wellbeing is any link into wellbeing, for better or worse, with changes for the worse reported apart. Paths are joined from one household's own links across its passages, never across households, and are reported beside the chains a respondent tells whole. Family relationships count as both a cause and something that changed only where the same household has a link into family relationships and a link from them on a path to wellbeing. Each passage about family relationships is also coded for whether it concerns spouses or co-wives, generations, both, or the household without saying. Weak passages are counted apart from firm ones and never added to them. Answers to closed questions are context, never evidence of a cause. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks.

Most households say what changed their overall wellbeing ( for the better, for the worse). The commonest account credits "Organisation 1" directly (). The next commonest credits relationships within the family (): better relationships in , and , and poor ones in . Smaller numbers credit learning in general, or higher income and production. Family relationships play both parts, but mostly the first. They are a change many households report (), most often credited to "Organisation 1" or to lessons on gender equality. In a smaller group they are also a step through which a household's wellbeing changed (), and they are both changed and a cause of better wellbeing on the same path explicitly only in and , and implicitly in . In the passages coded as family relationships, the relationship is almost always between spouses or co-wives (); also name children ( and ), and none speaks of relationships between generations alone ().

18 interviews in 2 groups · 661 passages coded · 13 October 2026 · Run 2026-10-13-s4s8

  • Verification in this report:
  • 29 numbers, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI. Click any number to see who it counts.
  • 661 quotations, every one found word for word in its interview. Click an interview's ID beside a quotation to read it in place.
  • 55 findings and 5 high-level findings, every one checked against the interviews after they were coded a second time.

The counts are of households, out of all the households read (). "Organisation 1" is named in , and every count that credits it is among those households. In their answers to the closed questions, say their wellbeing improved and say relations between men and women improved. Those answers are context, not evidence of what caused the change.

What households credit for their wellbeing

"Organisation 1" is the source most often named. Counting every path a household's own links make, have one from "Organisation 1" to better wellbeing. Most of these credit it in one step, as in "Thank God for the arrival of Organisation 1 which brought a lot of improvements in well being of our households" (, , ). credits "Organisation 1" together with the government: "Organisation 1 along with the Government have helped us be happy, emotionally" ().

Learning without a named source is credited by (, ). Production and income are credited by , in words such as "Getting more money out of sales has made me happy" (, ). Health is credited explicitly in only one household, , and there for the worse () (, and 1 more only implicitly). The figure below shows every link on a path to wellbeing, each traced within one household's own account.

Drawing the map with Graphviz, which loads from the internet the first time a report is opened.

Each arrow is a causal link; its number is how many sources mention it. A factor and its opposite share one box, so “Good health” also covers poor health. Colour says which way round: where an arrow’s tail is blue, the factor as labelled was the cause; where it is red, its opposite was the cause. The arrowhead says the same about the effect, and shades in between mean a mix. Box borders are coloured the same way. Click an arrow or a box to read its passages.

holds the documents’ full text

No respondent tells a chain to wellbeing whole in one passage. Each path longer than one step is joined from separate passages in the same interview.

Wellbeing that fell or stood still

The two households whose wellbeing fell or stayed poor give different reasons. puts it down to hunger and ill health: "for us to be well off, we need enough food which we do not have. Health wise we are not okay" () (, ). puts it down to how she is treated in a polygamous household: "the things that do not extend happiness to us, are that we are not given an ear" () (). The passage does not say who does not listen, though in her next answer she says "I am under my husbands orders". Neither household credits "Organisation 1" with the fall.

Family relationships as something that changed

Relationships within the family are among the changes households report most often: report them improving and report them poor or getting worse. "Organisation 1" is credited in , for example "Organisation 1 Group taught us to respect our wives and family in general" (, , ). Lessons with no named source, often on gender equality, are credited in (, ). In and the credit goes to "Organisation 2"'s counselling (, ). Where relationships were poor or got worse, households put it down to of how the family is made up: a husband with several wives, or a husband's death (, , ).

These are relationships between spouses. In the husband stopped beating his wives after "our leader and Organisation 1 incriminated my husband" (). In other households husbands and wives now decide together on farming, food and money (, ). Children appear in these passages only beside the relationship between spouses. In the respondent takes "better care of the babies and children" and credits the mothers' group with "all these things I mentioned", the joint decisions with her husband included (). In the husband keeps his two wives getting along "so as my kids live in harmony" ().

Family relationships as a cause of wellbeing

A smaller group of households say that better relationships themselves raised their wellbeing (, and 1 more only implicitly): "The reason for change is because there is now unity at home, where ideas are shared" (, , ). Here the relationships are mostly described as unity in the household as a whole, without saying between whom.

Relationships play both parts explicitly in two households, and , and implicitly in a third, : something changed them, and they in turn changed wellbeing. In , groups in the community brought "unity in households", which changed life at home (). In , the mothers' group's teaching improved her relationship with her husband, "and we are much happier" (). In , learning shared at home improved relations (), but the link from relations to wellbeing is implicit (). shows the same chain for the worse (): conflict among co-wives harmed relations (), and those relations kept wellbeing down (). None of these households credits "Organisation 1" with the change in relationships that led on to wellbeing § Family relationships as something that changed.

Limitations

A path joined from separate passages is the analyst's connection, not a chain the respondent told, and none of the paths to wellbeing was told whole. Most passages crediting "Organisation 1" with wellbeing name it in one step, without saying what changed in between, so they show who households credit rather than how the change came about. The relationships counted as "unspecified" () may often be between spouses, as the interviews' questions on decisions between men and women suggest, so the count for spouses is a lower bound. Which relationship a passage concerns was coded only for the passages coded as family relationships in the answer on income and food. Answers about the household that speak of caring for children (, , , , , , , , , and ), 's account of getting on with her father-in-law and children, and the relationship answers of and fall outside that coding, so the answer does not show how often households speak of relationships between generations.

  • The count of households where relationships play both parts rests on reading 's "unity in households", given in its answer about the community, as a change within the family; read as a change in the community, relationships would play both parts explicitly only in .
  • 's passage on caring for children is read as covering both spouses and children because it credits "all these things I mentioned"; read as about children alone, would be one household speaking of relationships between generations alone, and children would no longer appear only beside spouses. The coding of income, food, relationships and wellbeing comes unchanged from the answer on paths to income and food, so the two answers rest on the same reading of those passages.

Annex 4: how this answer was reached · The questions

Question 3 of 5

Who households credit for each kind of change

Question For each kind of change households report (health, food, income and production, family relationships, overall wellbeing), whom or what do they credit: "Organisation 1", other organisations and services ("Organisation 2", health services and other named organisations), government, their own effort, family members, the community, or weather and markets?

Where a household credits "Organisation 1" for a kind of change, does it also credit anything else for the same change? The answer builds on the answer about paths from "Organisation 1" to household income and food (13 October 2026, revised the same day), taking its coding of what changed income, food, family relationships and wellbeing, and on the earlier answer about influences on household health (8 October 2026, latest revision 13 October 2026), taking its coded health links and its classification of which programme organisation each interview names, all as they stand. Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each), counted out of all 18; a household can count under several sources. A household credits a source for a kind of change where its own links make a path from that source to the change, directly or through a practice such as farming or hygiene, joined within the household only; practices are the routes credit travels along, not sources. Credit for changes for the better and for the worse is counted apart. A household credits something else beside "Organisation 1" for a change where, among the households whose own firm links make a path from "Organisation 1" to that change, another source also has a path to it. Weak passages are counted apart from firm ones and never added to them. Answers to closed questions are context, never evidence of a cause. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks.

"Organisation 1" is the source households credit most often for every kind of change for the better: for health (), food (), income and production (), family relationships () and overall wellbeing (). It is seldom credited alone for health, food or income: most households that credit it for one of these also credit another source for the same change, chiefly health services for health, the household's own effort and health services for food, and a seed company and the household's own effort for income. For family relationships and wellbeing it more often stands alone. No household credits "Organisation 1" with a change for the worse (). Changes for the worse are put down to weather and markets, the make-up of the family or a husband's death, illness and other losses.

18 interviews in 2 groups · 786 passages coded · 13 October 2026 · Run 2026-10-13-q9tg

  • Verification in this report:
  • 47 numbers, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI. Click any number to see who it counts.
  • 786 quotations, every one found word for word in its interview. Click an interview's ID beside a quotation to read it in place.
  • 41 findings and 6 high-level findings, every one checked against the interviews after they were coded a second time.

The counts are of households, out of all the households read (); every household that credits "Organisation 1" is among the whose interviews name it. A household credits a source for a change where its own explicit links run from that source to the change, directly or through a practice the source brought, as in lectures leading to planting in lines, and planting in lines to a better harvest.

Health

Across all the households, health services are the next most often credited for better health (), for treatment, for advice on feeding and for hygiene lectures: "Yet this year I do not get much sick due to the follow up on the prescription given at the hospital" (, ). Other organisations and services (), the household's own effort () and the government () are each credited by fewer. "Organisation 2" is credited instead in and , two of the three households that name only it () (, ); credits it only implicitly.

Of the households crediting "Organisation 1" for better health, also credit another source. Health services are the commonest of these (). In some passages the two are named together, as in "thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well" (, ).

Food

Across all the households, including those that do not credit "Organisation 1" for food, the other sources credited for better food are health services (), the household's own effort (), other organisations and services () and the government (). Own effort here is mostly a business or shop of the household's own, which pays for food: "spaghetti, rice, fish, meat, and chicken because I have my own business besides the farm and garden" (). The government is credited for advice against food taboos in and (, ), for lectures on varying food in (), and for a pension or a veteran's income that buys food in and (, ). In , which does not credit "Organisation 1" for food, the neighbours help to keep the household fed: "with the neighbours help with giving food and the community we do eat a bit" ().

Of the households crediting "Organisation 1" for better food, also credit another source, most often their own effort (), health services () or other organisations and services ().

Income and production

Across all the households, including those that do not credit "Organisation 1" for income, such as , , and the three that name only "Organisation 2", the other sources credited for better income are other organisations and services (), the household's own effort () and family members (). The organisations are mostly a seed company, "Agriculturel Company A" (, , ), with a bank loan in () and "Organisation 7" in (). Own effort is most often an informal shop, other sales or small paid work: "I was obliged to open an informal shop so as I am not only dependent on my farm" (, , ). Family members are credited for a husband's business in , children's support in and the money a husband sends in (, , ). and credit the government, with a war veteran's income and a pension (, ); the passage also names group savings.

Of the households crediting "Organisation 1" for better income, also credit another source, chiefly other organisations and services () or their own effort (). The other organisation is in each case the seed company, named beside farming practices: "due to the good practices and with the mass production, irrigation systems with water pumps and purchases of improved seeds from Agriculturel Company A" ().

Family relationships and wellbeing

Better family relationships are credited to "Organisation 1" more than to any other source. Of the households crediting it for better relationships, only credit another source as well: a community leader in () (), and a wife's help and advice in () (). In and , "Organisation 2"'s counselling is credited () (, ).

Wellbeing follows the same pattern. Of the households crediting "Organisation 1" for better wellbeing, credit another source too: the farmers' group in () (), and the government, named beside "Organisation 1", in () ().

Changes for the worse

No household's links run from "Organisation 1" to a change for the worse (). What households blame instead depends on the kind of change. Falls in income and food are put down to rain, a cyclone, bugs and distance to the market (, ): "Because the rains were irregular, sometimes the rain would not pour at all" (). Worse family relationships are put down to several wives or women in one household, in and , and to a husband's death in (): "He has 4 wives and this makes it hard to have good relations in the family" (, , ). Other losses, such as chickens dying and theft from the barn, cut income in a few households (). In the church's ban on hospital visits is linked to worse health () (), and through the household's links from illness, to falls in food, income and wellbeing as well (, , ).

Limitations

A household's credit is read from links joined across its own passages, so a source credited for a practice in one passage is credited for the change that practice brought in another; the respondent may not have joined the two. Credit to "Organisation 1" and to another source for the same change is counted where both have a path to it, which says that the household names both, not how it weighs them. Sources named only implicitly are counted apart and are not in these counts. The income, food, relationships and wellbeing passages and the health passages come unchanged from the earlier answers, so this answer rests on the same reading of them; two of those rows are open to question: 's "WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1" is coded to health services rather than the government (), and 's income row credits the government for a passage that leads with group savings ().

  • "Organisation 1" leading for health rests on against for health services; if the one household crediting health services only implicitly were read as explicit and one "Organisation 1" household were read the other way, the two would tie.

Annex 5: how this answer was reached · The questions

Question 4 of 5

Differences by respondent sex and by province

Question How do the accounts of women and men respondents differ, and those of province A and province B, in which kinds of change they report (health, food, income and production, family relationships, overall wellbeing) and in how often they credit "Organisation 1"?

And how far along the chain does each household carry its credit to "Organisation 1": not at all, to a practice only, to health, to income or food, or to wellbeing? The answer builds on the earlier answers about influences on household health (8 October 2026, latest revision 13 October 2026), about paths from "Organisation 1" to income and food (13 October 2026), and about who households credit for each kind of change (13 October 2026), taking their coded links and their household-level record of which changes each household's links carry from "Organisation 1", all as they stand. Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each); the respondent's sex and the province are as the list of documents records them. Every count is given beside the size of its group, and no group is compared by share alone. A household reports a kind of change where it has an explicit link into it, for better or worse, counted apart. A household's reach is the highest rung its explicit links reach from "Organisation 1", in the order given; income and food form one rung. Because the three households naming only "Organisation 2" are all women's interviews in province B, credit to "Organisation 1" is also compared among the 15 households naming "Organisation 1". Implicit passages are counted apart from explicit ones and never added to them. Answers to closed questions are context, never evidence of a cause. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks.

The one clear difference between women and men is in credit for family relationships: among the households naming "Organisation 1", men credit it with better relationships in the home in men's interviews, against women's. Women alone report falls in food ( women, and no man), and women report falls in income more often (, against men), though the income difference would not survive one household read the other way and is unclear. Falls in family relationships, health and wellbeing are reported only by women, but by too few (, and ) to call a difference. For health, food and income, women and men credit "Organisation 1" at similar rates. Between the provinces, the households naming "Organisation 1" in province A carry their credit further along the chain than those in province B, but province B holds only such households, too few to compare. Province B also overlaps with the "Organisation 2" area: its other households name only "Organisation 2". A difference between the provinces therefore cannot be told apart from a difference between the two programmes, or from four households' particular stories.

18 interviews in 2 groups · 670 passages coded · 13 October 2026 · Run 2026-10-13-pv88

  • Verification in this report:
  • 72 numbers, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI. Click any number to see who it counts.
  • 670 quotations, every one found word for word in its interview. Click an interview's ID beside a quotation to read it in place.
  • 40 findings and 4 high-level findings, every one checked against the interviews after they were coded a second time.

The counts are of households, each beside the size of its group. Of the households, are women's interviews in province A, women's in province B, men's in A and men's in B. The three households naming only "Organisation 2" are all women's interviews in province B (, ), and do not credit "Organisation 1" at all. Credit to "Organisation 1" is therefore compared among the households naming it: women and men, in province A and in province B. With groups of six men, or four households in province B, one household moves a share a long way. The comparisons describe these households and are no estimate of any wider population.

How far the credit reaches

Each household's reach is the highest step its own explicit links carry credit from "Organisation 1": none, a practice only, better health, better income or food, and better wellbeing. Among the women's interviews, reach income or food, wellbeing and a practice only; the that do not credit "Organisation 1" are the "Organisation 2" households. Among the men's, reach wellbeing, income or food and health. The chart below shows the reach for women and for men.

FemaleMale
0%25%50%75%100%No creditNo creditPractice onlyPractice …HealthHealthIncome or foodIncome or…WellbeingWellbeingReachFemale, No credit: 3 of 12 householdsFemale, Practice only: 1 of 12 householdsFemale, Health: 0 of 12 householdsFemale, Income or food: 5 of 12 householdsFemale, Wellbeing: 3 of 12 householdsMale, No credit: 0 of 6 householdsMale, Practice only: 0 of 6 householdsMale, Health: 1 of 6 householdsMale, Income or food: 2 of 6 householdsMale, Wellbeing: 3 of 6 householdsFemale, No credit: 3 of 12 householdsFemale, Practice only: 1 of 12 householdsFemale, Health: 0 of 12 householdsFemale, Income or food: 5 of 12 householdsFemale, Wellbeing: 3 of 12 householdsMale, No credit: 0 of 6 householdsMale, Practice only: 0 of 6 householdsMale, Health: 1 of 6 householdsMale, Income or food: 2 of 6 householdsMale, Wellbeing: 3 of 6 households
Each point is the share of households in its group. Point at a point for its count; click it for its passages.

In province A every household naming "Organisation 1" reaches income or food () or wellbeing (). The four such households in province B spread across four different steps: one each at a practice only, health, income or food, and wellbeing (, , , ). The household that stops at a practice is : "Organisation 1" taught it to store maize in bags against pests (), but its harvest fell this year because "the rains were irregular" (). The chart below shows the reach by province.

AB
0%25%50%75%100%No creditNo creditPractice onlyPractice …HealthHealthIncome or foodIncome or…WellbeingWellbeingReachA, No credit: 0 of 11 householdsA, Practice only: 0 of 11 householdsA, Health: 0 of 11 householdsA, Income or food: 6 of 11 householdsA, Wellbeing: 5 of 11 householdsB, No credit: 3 of 7 householdsB, Practice only: 1 of 7 householdsB, Health: 1 of 7 householdsB, Income or food: 1 of 7 householdsB, Wellbeing: 1 of 7 householdsA, No credit: 0 of 11 householdsA, Practice only: 0 of 11 householdsA, Health: 0 of 11 householdsA, Income or food: 6 of 11 householdsA, Wellbeing: 5 of 11 householdsB, No credit: 3 of 7 householdsB, Practice only: 1 of 7 householdsB, Health: 1 of 7 householdsB, Income or food: 1 of 7 householdsB, Wellbeing: 1 of 7 households
Each point is the share of households in its group. Point at a point for its count; click it for its passages.

Credit to "Organisation 1" by kind of change

Among the households naming "Organisation 1", women and men credit it at similar rates for better health ( women, men), food (, ), income (, ) and wellbeing (, ). The exception is family relationships. Men speak of being taught how to treat their wives: "Organisation 1 teaches us how to get along with women in our homes" (), and "Organisation 1 Group taught us to respect our wives and family in general" (); a third credits the gender-equality lectures he and his wife attended (). The two women who credit it describe the change from the other side: a husband who no longer beats them, which one credits to "our leader and Organisation 1" (), and dialogue in household decisions since attending its talks ().

By province, the households naming "Organisation 1" in province A credit it for each kind of change at least as often as those in province B: health ( against ), food ( against ), income ( against ), family relationships ( against ) and wellbeing ( against ). With only four households on the province B side, every one of these differences would shift with one household read the other way, so none is clear.

Kinds of change reported

Most households report a change in health, food and income: health in women's and men's interviews, food in and , income in and ; by province, income in in province A against in province B. All men report a change in family relationships, against women. The larger difference is in changes for the worse, which come almost entirely from women's interviews. Falls in income, food, relationships, health and wellbeing are reported by , , , and women respectively; among the men, report a fall in income and none reports a fall in any of the others. Two of these women describe polygamous households in conflict: "we are 4 women, in one household, and we are not getting along well because of conflicts in the house" (), and "He has 4 wives and this makes it hard to have good relations in the family" (); the second adds that "my husband does not allow for me to part take in the savings" (). Another describes losing her husband ().

In province B, falls in income () and food () are more common than in province A ( and ); the food difference would survive one household read the other way, the income difference would not. In province B the falls in income are mostly put down to rain: "this season/year we produced little and had less productivity which was caused by raining that damaged and destroyed our production" (, ). Three of the five province B households reporting a fall in income, and three of the four reporting a fall in food, are the "Organisation 2" households, so this difference too may belong to the programme area rather than the province.

Limitations

The groups are small, and the "Organisation 2" households all fall in one cell (women in province B), so a difference by sex among women's falls in food or income may partly be one of programme area, and the reverse. The respondent's sex is that of the person interviewed, not of the head of household, and the interview spoke for the household. Reach is read from links joined within each household's own account, so a household that told its story in fewer passages may show a lower step without having experienced less. The coded links come unchanged from the earlier answers; only each household's reach is derived here, from those links.

Annex 6: how this answer was reached · The questions

Question 5 of 5

Strong support for "Organisation 1"'s contribution to household wellbeing

Question How strongly do the accounts support the claim that "Organisation 1"'s work contributed to better household wellbeing, against this rubric, which the evaluator fixed before the chapter's documents were read?

- Breadth (counted): strong if at least 10 of the households whose interviews name "Organisation 1" credit it by name for some change; moderate 5 to 9; weak under 5. - Reach along the chain (counted): strong if at least 5 households carry the credit past a practice to income, food or wellbeing; moderate 2 to 4; weak 0 or 1. - Attribution not crowded out (read from quoted passages): strong where, when "Organisation 1" is credited, other causes named for the same change are minor or complementary; moderate mixed; weak other causes usually named as the main one. - Harms (counted): strong if no household credits "Organisation 1" with a change for the worse; moderate 1 household; weak 2 or more. Overall: strong if at least three criteria are strong and none weak; weak if two or more are weak; moderate otherwise. The answer builds on the earlier answers about influences on household health (8 October 2026, latest revision 13 October 2026), about paths from "Organisation 1" to income and food, about who households credit for each kind of change, and about differences by sex and province (all 13 October 2026), taking their coded links and their household-level records of how far each household's links carry credit from "Organisation 1", all as they stand. Cases are households (one interview document each). Breadth is counted out of the 15 households whose interviews name "Organisation 1"; a household credits it by name for some change where an explicit link runs from "Organisation 1" to a practice or a change. Reach counts households whose explicit links run from "Organisation 1" to better income, food or wellbeing. Harms counts households whose explicit links run from "Organisation 1" to a change for the worse. Attribution is read from the passages naming another cause for health, food, income, family relationships or wellbeing in the households that credit "Organisation 1" for the same change. Implicit passages are counted apart from explicit ones and never added to them. Answers to closed questions are context, never evidence of a cause. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks.

Against the evaluator's rubric, the accounts give strong support to the claim that "Organisation 1"'s work contributed to better household wellbeing. All four criteria are strong, so the overall verdict follows the rubric's rule: strong where at least three criteria are strong and none is weak. Every household that names "Organisation 1" credits it by name for some change, most carry that credit to better income, food or wellbeing, and none credits it with a change for the worse. The other causes named beside it are mostly complementary; only in one household is another cause clearly named as the main one. The verdict concerns contribution, as the rubric does: the households' own accounts of what changed and why, not a measured effect.

18 interviews in 2 groups · 670 passages coded · 13 October 2026 · Run 2026-10-13-eghu

  • Verification in this report:
  • 10 numbers, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI. Click any number to see who it counts.
  • 670 quotations, every one found word for word in its interview. Click an interview's ID beside a quotation to read it in place.
  • 32 findings and 5 high-level findings, every one checked against the interviews after they were coded a second time.

The counts are of households. Breadth is counted out of the whose interviews name "Organisation 1". The other name only "Organisation 2".

Breadth: strong

Every household that names "Organisation 1" credits it by name for some change (), against the rubric's threshold of ten. The change is at least a practice, such as planting in lines, saving or handwashing, and usually more.

Reach along the chain: strong

Of these households, carry the credit past a practice to better income or food () or to better wellbeing (), against the rubric's threshold of five. Of the rest, one stops at health () and one at a practice (): , whose harvest fell "Because the rains were irregular" ().

Attribution not crowded out: strong

This criterion is read from the passages, not counted. In most households that credit "Organisation 1" for a change, the other causes named for that same change are complementary. Health services and the government are named beside "Organisation 1" as giving the same advice: "I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies)" (), and "AFTER THE LECTURES GIVEN BY GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, CHANGED MENTAL CONCEPTION IN VARYING THE FOOD" (, , ). A seed company supplies the inputs for better production (, ). A side business is described as an addition: "this is another source of income" (, , ).

puts better food down to "my own business besides the farm and garden" (), an addition to the farm rather than a rival to it. Another cause is named as the main one in , whose income fell: "everything we have is due to business that my husband does and also through savings" (). is close to that line: "I can buy bicycles, I do have thanks to my informal shop" (), beside the farm income it credits to "Organisation 1"'s teaching. One clear case and one close case, against complementary causes in the rest, fit the descriptor for strong: other causes minor or complementary. The reading could reasonably be moderate instead, if the side businesses in and are taken as main causes of what those households can buy; the overall verdict is strong either way.

Some other households name a main cause of income that is not "Organisation 1", such as 's veteran's pension (). They do not credit "Organisation 1" for income, so these are not causes of the same change, and they do not bear on this criterion.

Harms: strong

No household's links run from "Organisation 1" to a change for the worse (). The falls households report are put down to rain (, ), illness (), pregnancy (), theft () and the make-up of the family ().

Limitations

The verdict rests on what households said; their accounts were not checked against any other record. Crediting a source here means naming it on a path to a change. It does not say how much of the change the source made, so the verdict supports the claim of contribution and not a size of effect. All the coding comes unchanged from the earlier answers in this chapter, so this verdict rests on the same reading of the passages and is not independent evidence for them.

  • Attribution is a judgement on the passages and could be read as moderate. On its own that would leave the overall verdict strong, but together with one household crediting "Organisation 1" with a change for the worse (1 more), it would make the overall verdict moderate.

Annex 7: how this answer was reached · The questions

Annexes

Checked for differences between the questions. Compared 122 values counted in 407 cells of 46 tables and 112 column and code definitions across 7 questions.

Read these before setting numbers from different questions side by side:

  • The columns "Cause" and "Effect" are defined in different words in the shared steps, question 1, question 2, question 3, question 4 and question 5.
  • Organisation named: Organisation 1 only is counted out of 15 households in the shared steps and question 1 but out of 18 households in the shared steps, question 1, question 2, question 3 and question 5.
  • Organisation named: Organisation 2 only is counted out of 18 households in the shared steps, question 1, question 2, question 3 and question 5 but out of 3 households in the shared steps and question 1.
  • Credits organisation 1: No and Yes are counted out of 15 households in the shared steps, out of 18 households in the shared steps and out of 3 households in the shared steps.
  • Org1 food, Org1 health and Org1 income: No and Yes are counted out of 15 households in question 1, out of 18 households in question 3 and out of 3 households in question 1.

Annex 1 of 7

Background: Influences on household health and the role of "Organisation 1's" activities

Handed over as across-the-18-household-interviews-what-influences-2026-10-13-revision-7-f5fc35b4.html.

Question Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services?

Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks.

Households say their health got better mainly through hygiene and sanitation: latrines, handwashing at tip-taps, mosquito nets, treated water and litter pits. Eating better comes second: more varied food, more meals, better infant feeding and dropping food taboos. Health care, more production or income, and general learning come far behind. A few households also name influences that made health worse. "Organisation 1" is the source households name most often for these changes. Of the households whose interviews name "Organisation 1", credit it by name in a passage about their health, and 2 more only hint at it. This counts only passages about health that themselves name "Organisation 1", so it leaves out a household such as , which names it for its farming () and joins production to health in a passage that does not name it (). Its credit here is concentrated on hygiene: it is named for hygiene in households that credit hygiene with better health, and for diet in only that credit diet. It is named in no passage for health care, for income or for any influence that made health worse. Health services are the other source named most, often in the same breath as "Organisation 1". In the three households of "Organisation 2"'s area, "Organisation 2" takes a similar place for hygiene, and less firmly for diet. The judgement is fairly firm that, in these accounts, "Organisation 1"'s hygiene teaching is the activity households credit most for better health. It is much less certain how much of the change it caused. The interviews named the programme, many hygiene passages name no source, and health services share the credit in several households. Accounts that go against an overall improvement in health are , , and the second respondent in (below).

18 interviews in 2 groups · 235 passages coded · 13 October 2026

  • Verification in this report:
  • 50 numbers, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI. Click any number to see who it counts.
  • 235 quotations, every one found word for word in its interview. Click an interview's ID beside a quotation to read it in place.
  • 92 findings and 5 high-level findings, every one checked against the interviews after they were coded a second time.

What households credit for changes in their health

Every household answered “Improved” when asked how the health of their family had changed (), and in their own accounts all give at least one influence that made health better. households also name something that made it worse. Four accounts describe the respondent's own health as poor or worse this year: "This year things are getting worst, we often get sicker" (); "I got more sick this year as in comparison to the other years" (); "now I get more sick than usual" (); and “I am always sick” (, second respondent).

  • Hygiene and sanitation is the most common influence: households credit it with better health, and 3 more hint at it. In those that only hint, the passage puts hygiene beside health or gives health only as its purpose (, , ). Accounts run from the practice to less sickness: "I no longer get as sick as I used to because I now have good hygienic practices" (); "we do not get sick as much in comparison to last year as I now have good practices in hygiene and health" ().
  • Diet and nutrition comes next: households credit it with better health, with 4 more only hinting at it. Many of these accounts concern children and babies, some of whom used to fall ill: "the children would easily get sick this is because they never had nutrition" (); "we did not have a good diet and as a result my household members easily got sick" (). Others link it to infant feeding and to dropping food taboos (, , ).
  • Health care comes up less often: households credit treatment or the hospital with better health, and 1 more hint at it. Examples are follow-up on a prescription (), or going to the hospital rather than traditional doctors ().

The chart shows, for each influence, how many households credit it with making health better or worse.

BetterWorse
Hygiene sanitation
Diet nutrition
Health care
Production income0
Climate weather0
General learning0
Other0
Religion beliefs0
Households in each group. Each number is out of 18 households. Paler, and + beside a count: those that say it only implicitly, which the count leaves out. Click a count for its passages.
  • Production, income or savings, joined directly to health without naming food, appears in households, with 2 more only hinting at it: "More production and this promotes good health" (); "With these changes I can keep my family in good health" ().
  • Lessons or help in general, with no practice named, is credited in household, where knowledge from unnamed “NGO's” is said to have made physical health better (). 1 more hints at it ().

The part played by "Organisation 1"

"Organisation 1" is named in interviews and "Organisation 2" in . No interview names both (). In the passages about health, households, out of all the households, credit "Organisation 1" by name, and 2 more only hint at it ( and ). All of them are in its own area, so the same households are of those whose interviews name it. Within that area, the exception is . That household credits the hospital and unnamed “learning” for its health, and names "Organisation 1" only for storing its harvest ().

Its part differs by influence. The chart shows, for each influence, how many households credit it in a passage that names "Organisation 1" and how many in a passage that does not.

Credits organisation 1 for this reason Raised, not tied to that
Hygiene sanitation10 +312 +2
Diet nutrition5 +28 +6
Health care04 +1
Production income02 +2
Climate weather01
General learning0 +11
Other01
Religion beliefs01
Households in each group. Each number is out of 18 households. Paler, and + beside a count: those that say it only implicitly, which the count leaves out. Click a bar for the passages behind it.
  • Hygiene and sanitation. households, out of all the households, credit "Organisation 1" by name for the hygiene changes behind their better health, and 3 more hint at it. That is households that credit hygiene explicitly. The accounts are specific and in the respondents' own words: "With the arrival of Organisation 1 we have good hygienic and health practices in which we use latrines, we wash our hands after using the bathrooms, we use mosquito nets" (); "with the arrival of Organisation 1, we were taught a lot that has been useful in our household" and "I rarely get sick as I did before" (); "Training from Organisation 1 was on improved latrines, washing hands after toilet use, Making Tip Taps (technique) to wash hands and also bathing more often" (). Passages that credit hygiene without naming "Organisation 1" come from households, with 2 more hinting. Most of these households name it in another hygiene passage. In , and the passage names "Organisation 2" or no one (). In its own area, the households that credit hygiene firmly but never name "Organisation 1" for it are and , and only hints at it (, , ).
  • Diet and nutrition. households, out of all the households, credit "Organisation 1" by name for the dietary changes behind better health, and 2 more hint at it. That is households that credit diet explicitly. Diet passages that do not name it come from households, with 6 more hinting; these include 's lack of food, which made health worse. Where it is named, it is often for teaching on infant feeding, shared with the hospital or health centre: "I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies)" (, ). Elsewhere it is credited for meals and dropped taboos (, ). The gap between hygiene and diet would survive one household being read the other way, but it would narrow.
  • Health care, production and income. No passage credits "Organisation 1" for health care () or for production or income as a direct route to health (). Several of these households do credit "Organisation 1" for farming elsewhere in the interview (, ). Respondents themselves sometimes join production to better food and then to health: "With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals" (, ). So this route probably runs partly through "Organisation 1"'s farming work. The health passages credit it there only through diet, so the counts here do not include that indirect credit.

So, compared with the other influences, "Organisation 1"'s activities sit behind the influence households credit most, hygiene and sanitation, and behind part of the second, diet. They are not credited for the health care that some households also rely on, nor for any of the negative influences. § What households credit for changes in their health

The map draws these routes together: on the left, the sources households credit for each influence; on the right, household health. Opposites are combined, so a passage about an influence that made health worse sits on the same arrow as one about the influence making it better, with the flipped ends marked: the arrow from diet to household health holds better food bringing better health and, in , too little food keeping health poor (). The map shows only links that at least two households make, counting both poles together. So the arrow from health care holds both care that helped and care that did not, in households (, ). Every arrow from a source comes from a passage that also says how health changed, so a route such as "Organisation 1" to hygiene to household health is one respondents tell, not one joined up from separate statements.

Drawing the map with Graphviz, which loads from the internet the first time a report is opened.

Each arrow is a causal link; its number is how many sources mention it. A factor and its opposite share one box, so “Good health” also covers poor health. Colour says which way round: where an arrow’s tail is blue, the factor as labelled was the cause; where it is red, its opposite was the cause. The arrowhead says the same about the effect, and shades in between mean a mix. Box borders are coloured the same way. Click an arrow or a box to read its passages.

holds the documents’ full text

Other organisations and health services

Health services are the main other source named. They are credited for hygiene in households (2 more hinting), for diet in (2 more hinting), and for treatment itself, for better or worse, in (1 more hinting). In "Organisation 1"'s area they are credited for some influence in , , , , and , with and only hinting. That is fewer households than credit "Organisation 1", a difference that would survive one household being read the other way. § The part played by "Organisation 1" Several accounts share the credit between "Organisation 1" and the health services: "thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well" (); "LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER" (); "WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1" (). So in those households, "Organisation 1"'s part is one of two named sources and cannot be separated from the government's.

In the households naming "Organisation 2", that organisation takes a similar place to the one "Organisation 1" holds elsewhere. It is credited for hygiene in households, with 1 more hinting (). It is credited for diet in , with 1 more hinting. One example: "With the lectures that we had regarding personal hygiene and regarding our yards with the exemplary mother's group from Organisation 2, we now become less sick" (, , ). All three of these households credit the hospital or health centre for treatment ('s for the worse) (, , ). In "Organisation 1"'s area only does, and hints at it. That difference holds in these documents but rests on three households. On diet, health services are credited in and ( hinting) against and ( hinting) elsewhere; with this few documents, that difference is unclear (, ). The same hygiene-and-diet pattern under a different organisation suggests the route to better health reflects this kind of programme, not anything particular to "Organisation 1". § The part played by "Organisation 1" But that comparison rests on households.

Influences that made health worse

Health got worse, or did not improve, in households (, and ). No passage connects these influences to "Organisation 1". Each comes from a single household, except health care, which also hints at. The map shows them with opposites combined: every arrow ends at household health, flipped because health got worse or stayed poor, and the arrows from hygiene, diet and health care are flipped at their start as well, because the passage tells of the lack of that influence rather than its presence:

Drawing the map with Graphviz, which loads from the internet the first time a report is opened.

Each arrow is a causal link; its number is how many sources mention it. A factor and its opposite share one box, so “Good health” also covers poor health. Colour says which way round: where an arrow’s tail is blue, the factor as labelled was the cause; where it is red, its opposite was the cause. The arrowhead says the same about the effect, and shades in between mean a mix. Box borders are coloured the same way. Click an arrow or a box to read its passages.

holds the documents’ full text

  • religious rules against the hospital: "Our churches prohibited us from visiting the hospital and as a result five of my children are dead" ();
  • not having enough food ();
  • climate and weather bringing flu and malaria ();
  • medication at the hospital that the respondent felt made things worse (), and, as a hint, hospital pills that brought no change ();
  • malaria from sleeping without mosquito nets "as we have not received them in a while" ();
  • age ().

These households still answered “Improved” to the closed question, like every other household (). That includes , where the respondent says "This year things are getting worst, we often get sicker" (). In the hinted credit to "Organisation 1" for hygiene () sits beside continuing illness: "We try to change but we still do get sick even though we make use of mosquito nets" ().

Limitations

  • The counts are of households in a small sample that was not drawn at random. They say how many of these households said something, not how common it is in the wider population.
  • The interviews do not appear to have been blindfolded. "Organisation 1" is named throughout its area's interviews, and each interview ends with an “Important link to” list of organisations. Respondents may have credited it more readily because they knew what the interview was about.
  • Credit to "Organisation 1" is counted only where the passage names it. Unnamed “lectures”, “the mothers group” or “a promoter” are not counted, and no list of the programme's activities was available to recognise them. So the counts of credit to "Organisation 1" are a floor.
  • Every household rated its health “Improved”, so there is no group whose health did not improve to compare with.
  • The interviews for and each hold two respondents' accounts. Each document is counted as one household.

How this report was written

What was read. Rubicon read all 18 documents in full. The counts below are of households, one document each.

Coding. It then read each document as a whole and recorded which of the two programme organisations the interview names anywhere in the document. It also marked every passage that bears on the question and recorded the influence the respondent names as acting on household health in this passage and whether, in the passage, the influence made health better or worse over the period the interview asks about, with three yes-or-no codes besides, each defined in the codebook. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors.

Second coding and check. The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here. The two codings differed in 33 places. A reader ruled on each against the text: 19 for the first coding, 14 for the second. It tightened 2 definitions as a result, and corrected the coding to match. It searched the documents each count leaves out for passages both coders had missed, and added them. It also checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, so the coding and the answer in this report are the corrected ones, counted again after the check.

Counting. Households were then counted in 9 tables, compared by these codings, and drawn in two causal maps. The annex below gives each.

Writing and checks. Rubicon wrote the answer from these counts, citing for each finding the passages it rests on. Every number in the answer, 50 in all, was computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI, and all 235 quotations were found word for word in their documents.

Revisions. The report was revised 7 times after it was first drawn, and counted and checked again each time; the changes are listed at the end of this annex.

The workflow x-ray beside Step by step, below, draws the same procedure, a box for each stage and what it made.

Step by step

The analysis was written down as a workflow before it was counted: what to look for, how to code it, what to count. It was then counted directly from the coded passages rather than by the AI, so anyone can check a number, and another coder can follow the same definitions and code the interviews afresh.

What was read

All 18 documents, read in full: 11 20-45 years, 7 46+ years.

Coding: Programme org

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

The instruction a second coder would follow
Read the whole interview and record which programme organisation the household's account names anywhere, including the interviewer's closing notes and the 'Important link to' lines.
Organisation named

Which of the two programme organisations the interview names anywhere in the document. Quote the first passage that names it. Weak: never; the name either appears or it does not.

CodeMeansCountsDoes not count
Organisation 1 onlyThe interview names "Organisation 1" and does not name "Organisation 2".Any mention of "Organisation 1" by name, by the respondent or in the interviewer's notes.Unnamed groups, lectures or 'the project' with no name.
Organisation 2 onlyThe interview names "Organisation 2" and does not name "Organisation 1".Any mention of "Organisation 2" by name.Other numbered organisations alone (place by which of the two is named).
BothThe interview names both "Organisation 1" and "Organisation 2".Both names appear.One name only.
NeitherThe interview names neither organisation.No mention of either name.Any mention of either name.
The coded passages 18 rows
Organisation 1 only 15 passages
  • We changed our behaviours because we learned from Organisation 1 that the way one behaves contributes to a health status.
  • this was how we were taught to do things (Organisation 1)
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 we have good hygienic and health practices
  • thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1, we were taught a lot that has been useful in our household
  • which was implemented by Organisation 1
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, ever since I participated in the lectures
  • I now plant in lines and I harvest well because we learn with Organisation 1.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 I participate in the a lot of lectures
  • BUT WITH THE BASIS OF THE TEACHING OF GOOD PRACTICES from Organisation 1
  • THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1
  • These we learned from Organisation 1.
  • WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1
  • we also learn from a nutrition promoter from Organisation 1.
Organisation 2 only 3 passages
  • All this was possible by the learning from Organisation 2.
  • These changes come as a result of training held by Organisation 2 started this January.
  • These was learned from Organisation 2 project.

Coding: Health map

one row for each passage that fits; 134 rows.

The instruction a second coder would follow
Restate every health_links passage as causal links, with the same quote and weak mark: one link from its influence to household health, and one link from each source the passage credits ("Organisation 1", "Organisation 2", health services) to its influence. A factor's opposite pole is its label with a leading ~: where the passage's direction is worse, the effect is ~Household health, and an influence with an opposite pole (hygiene and sanitation, diet and nutrition, health care, production and income, general learning) is coded at its ~ pole, as the lack of it; religious rules and beliefs, climate and weather and other influences are forces with no opposite pole and stay as they are. Read no passage afresh and add none.
Cause

The link's cause: a source credited with an influence, or an influence acting on health. Weak: the health_links row the link restates is weak.

CodeMeansCountsDoes not count
Organisation 1The programme organisation "Organisation 1", as a source the passage itself names.A passage that itself names "Organisation 1", 'the project (Organisation 1)', or a promoter, leader or group 'from Organisation 1', as having brought, taught or supplied the cause.Unnamed lectures, groups or promoters, even where the respondent ties them to "Organisation 1" elsewhere; the 'Important link to' lines.
Organisation 2The programme organisation "Organisation 2", as a source the passage itself names.A passage that itself names "Organisation 2", 'the project (Organisation 2)', or a promoter, leader or group 'from Organisation 2', as having brought, taught or supplied the cause.Unnamed NGOs or groups; the 'Important link to' lines.
Health servicesHospitals, health centres, health workers or the government's health services, including 'the ministry of health', as a source.A passage crediting any of these with the cause.Advice from unnamed people.
Other organisations and servicesA named organisation, company, bank, cooperative or service other than those above.Agricultural companies supplying seed, banks, named savings schemes, other numbered organisations.Unnamed groups (Other influence); "Organisation 1"'s own groups where the passage names "Organisation 1".
GovernmentThe government, state or authorities other than health services.Government payments, the police or the law, state programmes.Health services (Health services); a village or community leader (Community and neighbours).
Own effortThe respondent's or the household's own work, choice, decision or business, made during the period and named as what brought the change, with no outside source.Opening an informal shop, small works for pay, deciding to diversify crops or to spend savings on a house.A practice the passage says was learnt from a named source (code the source to the practice); a named other member of the family (Family members); an intention or hope for the future, which is not coded at all.
Family membersA member of the household or wider family, or the way the family is made up, named as the cause.A husband's business, a spouse's decision, a polygamous household's conflicts, a relative's help.Relationships between members as a state (Family relationships).
Community and neighboursNeighbours, the community or a community leader, as the source.Neighbours giving food; a leader stopping violence.Named organisations (code them).
Weather and marketsRain, drought, storms, prices, demand or sales conditions acting on production, income or food. No opposite pole.Irregular rain cutting production; a lack of buyers.Weather said to bring illness (Climate and weather); the household's own selling (Production and income).
Climate and weatherWeather or climate said to bring illness. No opposite pole.Heat, cold, rain or climate change named as a cause of sickness.Weather that hurt the harvest (Weather and markets).
Religious rules and beliefsA religious or cultural rule or belief. No opposite pole.A church forbidding hospital visits; a husband's taboo forbidding something.Food taboos being dropped (Diet and nutrition).
Land and soilThe land a household farms: its fertility and where its plots lie.Soil fertility or a plot's location named as what helped or harmed production.Rain itself (Weather and markets); farming practices on the land (Farming practices).
~Land and soilLand that has lost its fertility, or plots whose location harms production (such as a flooded plain).The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Farming practicesWays of farming, keeping livestock and storing the harvest: planting in lines, spacing, manure, fertiliser, improved seed, vaccinating animals, bagging and storing grain.A practice the passage says was taken up or changed.Producing more as such (Production and income).
~Farming practicesFarming practices lacking or abandoned.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Savings and financial managementSaving, keeping accounts, controlling spending, joining a savings group or opening a bank account.A financial practice taken up or changed.Earning more as such (Production and income).
~Savings and financial managementBeing unable to save or manage money.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
General learningLessons, knowledge or help named without saying which practice changed.'The lectures', 'knowledge' or 'help' credited with a change in general.Lessons on a named practice (code the practice).
~General learningA lack of learning or help.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Hygiene and sanitationHygiene and sanitation practices or equipment: latrines, handwashing and tip-taps, mosquito nets, treated water, litter pits, bathing, washing food, a clean house and yard.Using or lacking any of these.What people eat (Diet and nutrition); treatment at a clinic (Health care).
~Hygiene and sanitationHygiene or sanitation lacking or not practised (e.g. sleeping without mosquito nets).The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Health careHealth services and treatment: going to the hospital or health centre, follow-up and medication, check-ups, or choosing the hospital over traditional healers.Treatment or use of health services.Advice from health staff on hygiene or diet (code the practice, with Health services as its source).
~Health careTreatment or care that was lacking, did not help or made things worse.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Household healthThe health of household members: illness, getting sick less or more, children's health and healthy growth.A change in household members' health.Diet or hygiene themselves (code those).
~Household healthHealth got worse or stayed poor: more illness, a death from illness.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Production and incomeWhat the household produces, earns, sells or can buy: harvests, livestock, sales, earnings, savings drawn on, purchasing power.A change in production, earnings, sales or what the household can buy.Food eaten (Diet and nutrition); saving as a practice (Savings and financial management).
~Production and incomeToo little production or income, or purchasing power fell.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Diet and nutritionWhat and how much household members eat: quantity, variety, meals, food through the hungry season, child and infant feeding, dropping food taboos.A change in food eaten or stored for eating.Food grown for sale (Production and income).
~Diet and nutritionNot enough food, less variety or a poor diet.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Family relationshipsRelationships within the family: between spouses and co-wives (communication, decisions, violence, sharing work and money) and between generations (care of children, parents and elders).A change in how household members treat, talk with or decide with each other.Relations with neighbours or the community (Community and neighbours if a cause, otherwise not coded).
~Family relationshipsRelationships worse, in conflict, or held back.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Household wellbeingThe household's overall wellbeing, happiness or being 'well off', named as such.A passage naming overall wellbeing, happiness or life in general as what changed.A change in one domain alone (code that domain).
~Household wellbeingWellbeing fell or stayed poor.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Other influenceAny other cause the respondent names, such as age, pregnancy or theft.A stated cause that fits none of the values above.Anything that fits a value above.
Effect

The link's effect: an influence a source brought, or household health or its opposite pole, ~Household health. Weak: as for cause.

CodeMeansCountsDoes not count
Organisation 1The programme organisation "Organisation 1", as a source the passage itself names.A passage that itself names "Organisation 1", 'the project (Organisation 1)', or a promoter, leader or group 'from Organisation 1', as having brought, taught or supplied the cause.Unnamed lectures, groups or promoters, even where the respondent ties them to "Organisation 1" elsewhere; the 'Important link to' lines.
Organisation 2The programme organisation "Organisation 2", as a source the passage itself names.A passage that itself names "Organisation 2", 'the project (Organisation 2)', or a promoter, leader or group 'from Organisation 2', as having brought, taught or supplied the cause.Unnamed NGOs or groups; the 'Important link to' lines.
Health servicesHospitals, health centres, health workers or the government's health services, including 'the ministry of health', as a source.A passage crediting any of these with the cause.Advice from unnamed people.
Other organisations and servicesA named organisation, company, bank, cooperative or service other than those above.Agricultural companies supplying seed, banks, named savings schemes, other numbered organisations.Unnamed groups (Other influence); "Organisation 1"'s own groups where the passage names "Organisation 1".
GovernmentThe government, state or authorities other than health services.Government payments, the police or the law, state programmes.Health services (Health services); a village or community leader (Community and neighbours).
Own effortThe respondent's or the household's own work, choice, decision or business, made during the period and named as what brought the change, with no outside source.Opening an informal shop, small works for pay, deciding to diversify crops or to spend savings on a house.A practice the passage says was learnt from a named source (code the source to the practice); a named other member of the family (Family members); an intention or hope for the future, which is not coded at all.
Family membersA member of the household or wider family, or the way the family is made up, named as the cause.A husband's business, a spouse's decision, a polygamous household's conflicts, a relative's help.Relationships between members as a state (Family relationships).
Community and neighboursNeighbours, the community or a community leader, as the source.Neighbours giving food; a leader stopping violence.Named organisations (code them).
Weather and marketsRain, drought, storms, prices, demand or sales conditions acting on production, income or food. No opposite pole.Irregular rain cutting production; a lack of buyers.Weather said to bring illness (Climate and weather); the household's own selling (Production and income).
Climate and weatherWeather or climate said to bring illness. No opposite pole.Heat, cold, rain or climate change named as a cause of sickness.Weather that hurt the harvest (Weather and markets).
Religious rules and beliefsA religious or cultural rule or belief. No opposite pole.A church forbidding hospital visits; a husband's taboo forbidding something.Food taboos being dropped (Diet and nutrition).
Land and soilThe land a household farms: its fertility and where its plots lie.Soil fertility or a plot's location named as what helped or harmed production.Rain itself (Weather and markets); farming practices on the land (Farming practices).
~Land and soilLand that has lost its fertility, or plots whose location harms production (such as a flooded plain).The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Farming practicesWays of farming, keeping livestock and storing the harvest: planting in lines, spacing, manure, fertiliser, improved seed, vaccinating animals, bagging and storing grain.A practice the passage says was taken up or changed.Producing more as such (Production and income).
~Farming practicesFarming practices lacking or abandoned.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Savings and financial managementSaving, keeping accounts, controlling spending, joining a savings group or opening a bank account.A financial practice taken up or changed.Earning more as such (Production and income).
~Savings and financial managementBeing unable to save or manage money.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
General learningLessons, knowledge or help named without saying which practice changed.'The lectures', 'knowledge' or 'help' credited with a change in general.Lessons on a named practice (code the practice).
~General learningA lack of learning or help.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Hygiene and sanitationHygiene and sanitation practices or equipment: latrines, handwashing and tip-taps, mosquito nets, treated water, litter pits, bathing, washing food, a clean house and yard.Using or lacking any of these.What people eat (Diet and nutrition); treatment at a clinic (Health care).
~Hygiene and sanitationHygiene or sanitation lacking or not practised (e.g. sleeping without mosquito nets).The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Health careHealth services and treatment: going to the hospital or health centre, follow-up and medication, check-ups, or choosing the hospital over traditional healers.Treatment or use of health services.Advice from health staff on hygiene or diet (code the practice, with Health services as its source).
~Health careTreatment or care that was lacking, did not help or made things worse.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Household healthThe health of household members: illness, getting sick less or more, children's health and healthy growth.A change in household members' health.Diet or hygiene themselves (code those).
~Household healthHealth got worse or stayed poor: more illness, a death from illness.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Production and incomeWhat the household produces, earns, sells or can buy: harvests, livestock, sales, earnings, savings drawn on, purchasing power.A change in production, earnings, sales or what the household can buy.Food eaten (Diet and nutrition); saving as a practice (Savings and financial management).
~Production and incomeToo little production or income, or purchasing power fell.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Diet and nutritionWhat and how much household members eat: quantity, variety, meals, food through the hungry season, child and infant feeding, dropping food taboos.A change in food eaten or stored for eating.Food grown for sale (Production and income).
~Diet and nutritionNot enough food, less variety or a poor diet.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Family relationshipsRelationships within the family: between spouses and co-wives (communication, decisions, violence, sharing work and money) and between generations (care of children, parents and elders).A change in how household members treat, talk with or decide with each other.Relations with neighbours or the community (Community and neighbours if a cause, otherwise not coded).
~Family relationshipsRelationships worse, in conflict, or held back.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Household wellbeingThe household's overall wellbeing, happiness or being 'well off', named as such.A passage naming overall wellbeing, happiness or life in general as what changed.A change in one domain alone (code that domain).
~Household wellbeingWellbeing fell or stayed poor.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Other influenceAny other cause the respondent names, such as age, pregnancy or theft.A stated cause that fits none of the values above.Anything that fits a value above.
The coded passages 134 rows
Organisation 1 22 passages
  • We previously took a bath per day, and we would go to the bushes to alleviate our selves. We changed our behaviours because we learned from Organisation 1 that the way one behaves contributes to a health status.
  • They cannot eat anything else because breast milk is good for them to grow healthy, for babies, and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies)
  • we learn various good things that are happening with the help of the project (Organisation 1) that take place here leading to our well being. For example; Having access to latrines/toilets, mosquito nets, Tip Taps (Water-Taps), digging of holes to throw litter into.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better this is because I now make use of better latrines, mosquito nets, I now wash my hands after using the toilet using the TIPTAPs, I drink treated water
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 we have good hygienic and health practices in which we use latrines, we wash our hands after using the bathrooms, we use mosquito nets, we drink treated water, we wash our hands before cooking, I leave trash in the appropriate place (holes). Yes, we do not get sick as much in comparison to last year as I now have good practices in hygiene and health.
  • we did not have a good diet and as a result my household members easily got sick. With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • as time passed I learn more about health thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well. Things have gotten better with these new practices, for example: the use of improve latrines, the use of TIP TAPs to wash our hands after using the bath room, the use of mosquito nets, we also was our hands before cooking, I now dump trash in the right place in holes. I no longer get a sick as I now use the good hygiene standards I was taught.
  • The main reason for the changes was how I changed the use of good practices pf hygiene and health (learned from Organisation 1).
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1, we were taught a lot that has been useful in our household, we now use improved latrines, we now use Tip Taps to wash our hands, I now drink treated water, I use mosquito nets and put litter in the appropriate place. I rarely get sick as I did before as I now have good hygiene practices and good health practices.
  • We wash our hands post toilet use, using the tip tap which has been placed along the wash room exit, which was implemented by Organisation 1.
  • My wife did not eat eggs when she was pregnant and she would have sick babies. Along with the help of Organisation 1 regardless of the fact that I had no little kids but I had a lot, my daughter in law did not have these problems.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, ever since I participated in the lectures which have helped me a lot and also in my household. We now make use of improved latrines/toilets. We use TIPTAPs to wash our hands. I now drink treated water, I also use mosquito nets and put litter into dug holes ever since the arrival of Organisation 1. I no longer get as sick as I used to because I now have good hygienic practices.
  • We suffered malnutrition and as a result we were not as healthy as we should have been. With the arrival of Organisation 1, along with the various changes regarding nutrition, nowadays, thank God with production and the money we earn we now have a diversity of food.
  • The mother's milk contains all proteins necessary for healthy growth. For all my sons they only had maternal milk, but after 6months they introduced other meals. He has three or more meals per day with life's improvement they eat well. This was different with the previous babies, we never had the lessons but now we are aware since Organisation 1 came about.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 I participate in the a lot of lectures in which we learnt how to use latrines and we now have Tip Taps to wash our hands, we now drink treated water, we use mosquito nets and we make use of mosquito nets, and I dump litter in the right place (holes). I no longer get sick as much and I do have better hygienic practices and healthy habits.
  • BECAUSE THERE WAS CHANGES IN THE LEARNING OF NEW PRACTICES IN HEALTH CARE (HEALTH AND HYGIENE) IN THE HOUSEHOLD IN WHICH CONSERVES HEALTH OF THE FAMILY. Training from Organisation 1 was on improved latrines, washing hands after toilet use, Making Tip Taps (technique) to wash hands and also bathing more often.
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • THE MAIN REASON IS GOOD HEALTH AND BODY DEVELOPMENT IS BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN VARIETY OF FOOD. I believe yes because they have eaten 3 meals a day as learned from Organisation 1 . Therefore my children are growing very well with good body muscles
  • WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, I HAD PARTICIPATED IN SOME LECTURES IN WHICH IT HELPED ME TO IMPROVE MY HEALTH AND HYGIENE OF MY FAMILY overall. I HAVE NOT BEEN ILL AS I HAVE PASSED TO APPLY THE NEW HYGIENE AND HEALTH RULES USING THE MOSQUITO NET, IMPROVED TOILETS,
  • MY FAMILY HAS INCREASED ECONOMICALLY IN THE HEALTH AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING OF THE FAMILY WITH THE COMMUNITY IN GENERAL. THE LECTURES GIVEN BY THE Organisation 1 TROUCE AN OPEN SPACE
  • My family have improve hygiene wise. We now take more baths, we constructed latrines that are better, we also wash our hands after using the toilets, we also learn from a nutrition promoter from Organisation 1.
Organisation 2 9 passages
  • After the learning, myself and my household we stopped living without hygiene adhering to a hygienic and clean environment. All this was possible by the learning from Organisation 2.
  • With the lectures that we had regarding personal hygiene and regarding our yards with the exemplary mother's group from Organisation 2, we now become less sick as in comparison to previously.
  • I gave these children porridge that I mix with peanuts and drumsticks which I learnt from the groups of Organisation 2. We now look to provide three meals, as we only had two meals per day and we did not look god food with good vitamins, ever since the lessons we now see the importance. We no longer have taboos in my family we eat everything for example: Pregnant women did not eat eggs or otherwise our children would grow without hair which was undesirable and as a result we never ate. We now know that we were losing out on vitamins for a babies healthy growth. These changes are good because we are able to have healthy babies.
  • In the case of hygiene, I have changed; now I use the toilet especially washing hands (previous I did not wash my hands), clean my yard, and wash the bathroom. These changes come as a result of training held by Organisation 2 started this January. We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera.
  • We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera. For all these practices of eating healthy food and doing improved latrines we had with support of health technician as well with staff from Organisation 2.
  • I eat different food such as orange sweet potato, soya porridge, porridge mixed with peanuts and eggs because for my health it was necessary. Also I would work a beat more sort of exercises and have food with little oil to avoid other diseases. These was learned from Organisation 2 project.
  • As per hygiene practice this had changed quite a lot, now we pay more attention to details such as washing hands after toilet use, we clean our yard and inside the house, we place trash on pits and those are full we close it and open new pit. We use soap and ash after using the toilet. We appreciate all of this from the hygiene and sanitation promotors form Organisation 2 and health technician (government). Since we learned we have not stopped doing what we learned and this is not different with other members from my household as we looking for wellbeing.
  • Due to our health and maintain healthier we eat balanced food and adopted hygiene practices like washing hands with soap. This was learned by through the Organisation 2 Project that helped us a lot.
  • This type of dietary helps maintain healthier child that facilitates the growing process of a child, these we learned from health (government) and Organisation 2 technician.
Health services 20 passages
  • They cannot eat anything else because breast milk is good for them to grow healthy, for babies, and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies)
  • as time passed I learn more about health thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well. Things have gotten better with these new practices, for example: the use of improve latrines, the use of TIP TAPs to wash our hands after using the bath room, the use of mosquito nets, we also was our hands before cooking, I now dump trash in the right place in holes. I no longer get a sick as I now use the good hygiene standards I was taught.
  • We like to visit tradition healers instead of going to the hospital, we now visit the hospital whenever we feel a need to.
  • We no longer have Taboo's, because the government's intervention, in health NGO's in our locations. Women are free to eat what they want, Taboo's no longer exist. Only in the old times. These changes are good because women go through their pregnancy without problems.
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • Yes, there has been changes because I control my health at the hospital and my personal hygiene has improved a lot.
  • I have to say that the hospital had always informed us on taking care of hygiene but we would refuse thinking that the traditional doctors would be take care of us. We were complete wrong today we see that.
  • we stopped using the traditional doctors as we did before because we have seen that they were not able to give medication to some disease such as malaria, diarrhoea those need hospital.
  • WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, I HAD PARTICIPATED IN SOME LECTURES IN WHICH IT HELPED ME TO IMPROVE MY HEALTH AND HYGIENE OF MY FAMILY overall. I HAVE NOT BEEN ILL AS I HAVE PASSED TO APPLY THE NEW HYGIENE AND HEALTH RULES USING THE MOSQUITO NET, IMPROVED TOILETS,
  • And my health gets worse for the fact that I am taking medication that I'm not even sure what are there for. The hospital do not have the attention of explaining it.
  • These changed after the training held on mothers group and some explanation from the hospital. We are now eating properly and we have broken the taboo that says women breastfeeding cannot eat an egg. These changes are good as we can see healthier and beautiful babies.
  • For such things, we have attended the health centre services to avoid getting worst.
  • Also to avoid diseases, we eat many fruits such as oranges that contain vitamins, we knew about it before yet we did not practice just because of lack of habit, yet now with reinforcement from the staff at the health centre we have started adopting these practices.
  • We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera. For all these practices of eating healthy food and doing improved latrines we had with support of health technician as well with staff from Organisation 2.
  • Changing feeding habits because of the reinforced messages received from the health centre staff and because climate changes we are not sure what next could come to us therefore we act in a more appropriate way avoid possible diseases. Changing the hygiene of the household and be more careful washing food products. These avoid and minimize the risk of being exposed to diseases.
  • I have gone to the hospital but they have nothing to say as they only give us pills. There has been no changes in regards to my sickness
  • Yet this year I do not get much sick due to the follow up on the prescription given at the hospital.
  • As per hygiene practice this had changed quite a lot, now we pay more attention to details such as washing hands after toilet use, we clean our yard and inside the house, we place trash on pits and those are full we close it and open new pit. We use soap and ash after using the toilet. We appreciate all of this from the hygiene and sanitation promotors form Organisation 2 and health technician (government). Since we learned we have not stopped doing what we learned and this is not different with other members from my household as we looking for wellbeing.
  • This type of dietary helps maintain healthier child that facilitates the growing process of a child, these we learned from health (government) and Organisation 2 technician.
Climate and weather 1 passages
  • Yet we get a bit sick theses days because of climate changes (a day gets very hot and the following day get cold or rains) that usually bring flu, malaria, headache and anaemia to the all household.
Religious rules and beliefs 1 passages
  • Our churches prohibited us from visiting the hospital and as a result five of my children are dead.
General learning 2 passages
  • our lives are changing for the better with the help from NGO's that transmit knowledge to us and as a result everything is changing for the better. In mental health, physical, emotional, and spiritual health everything is well and this changes for the better for us.
  • MY FAMILY HAS INCREASED ECONOMICALLY IN THE HEALTH AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING OF THE FAMILY WITH THE COMMUNITY IN GENERAL. THE LECTURES GIVEN BY THE Organisation 1 TROUCE AN OPEN SPACE
Hygiene and sanitation 39 passages
  • We previously took a bath per day, and we would go to the bushes to alleviate our selves. We changed our behaviours because we learned from Organisation 1 that the way one behaves contributes to a health status.
  • We also make use of mosquito net and we are well.
  • we learn various good things that are happening with the help of the project (Organisation 1) that take place here leading to our well being. For example; Having access to latrines/toilets, mosquito nets, Tip Taps (Water-Taps), digging of holes to throw litter into.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better this is because I now make use of better latrines, mosquito nets, I now wash my hands after using the toilet using the TIPTAPs, I drink treated water
  • The main motive for this change was the use of good practices of hygiene and health in my family in my household.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 we have good hygienic and health practices in which we use latrines, we wash our hands after using the bathrooms, we use mosquito nets, we drink treated water, we wash our hands before cooking, I leave trash in the appropriate place (holes). Yes, we do not get sick as much in comparison to last year as I now have good practices in hygiene and health.
  • The motive for this change is good practices in health and hygiene.
  • as time passed I learn more about health thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well. Things have gotten better with these new practices, for example: the use of improve latrines, the use of TIP TAPs to wash our hands after using the bath room, the use of mosquito nets, we also was our hands before cooking, I now dump trash in the right place in holes. I no longer get a sick as I now use the good hygiene standards I was taught.
  • The main reason for the changes was how I changed the use of good practices pf hygiene and health (learned from Organisation 1).
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1, we were taught a lot that has been useful in our household, we now use improved latrines, we now use Tip Taps to wash our hands, I now drink treated water, I use mosquito nets and put litter in the appropriate place. I rarely get sick as I did before as I now have good hygiene practices and good health practices.
  • The reason is good hygiene practices and good health and also for having stuck to the good manners in my household.
  • We wash our hands post toilet use, using the tip tap which has been placed along the wash room exit, which was implemented by Organisation 1.
  • It has improved a lot because we no longer abide by the old manners that we had, and as a result my family rarely gets sick as in comparison to before.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, ever since I participated in the lectures which have helped me a lot and also in my household. We now make use of improved latrines/toilets. We use TIPTAPs to wash our hands. I now drink treated water, I also use mosquito nets and put litter into dug holes ever since the arrival of Organisation 1. I no longer get as sick as I used to because I now have good hygienic practices.
  • The main cause for this change is a result of the teachings of good practices and the use of good manners and good hygiene and health.
  • We no longer get sick as we are more careful about our health and hygiene.
  • There has been improvement because I am learning how to live well with my family, and how to take care our hygiene, how many times we take showers during the day we do dig holes to put litter into.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 I participate in the a lot of lectures in which we learnt how to use latrines and we now have Tip Taps to wash our hands, we now drink treated water, we use mosquito nets and we make use of mosquito nets, and I dump litter in the right place (holes). I no longer get sick as much and I do have better hygienic practices and healthy habits.
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THIS CHANGE WAS ON FORMING GOOD PRACTICES FOR USE OF GOOD HYGIENE AND PRACTICE PRACTICES.
  • BECAUSE THERE WAS CHANGES IN THE LEARNING OF NEW PRACTICES IN HEALTH CARE (HEALTH AND HYGIENE) IN THE HOUSEHOLD IN WHICH CONSERVES HEALTH OF THE FAMILY. Training from Organisation 1 was on improved latrines, washing hands after toilet use, Making Tip Taps (technique) to wash hands and also bathing more often.
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • Yes, there has been changes because I control my health at the hospital and my personal hygiene has improved a lot.
  • We did these because based on the learned held on the importance of using mosquito net, improve latrines and wash hands we assume that since in the past we did not do it perhaps this could be the reason why we would be sick in my house.
  • I have to say that the hospital had always informed us on taking care of hygiene but we would refuse thinking that the traditional doctors would be take care of us. We were complete wrong today we see that.
  • WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, I HAD PARTICIPATED IN SOME LECTURES IN WHICH IT HELPED ME TO IMPROVE MY HEALTH AND HYGIENE OF MY FAMILY overall. I HAVE NOT BEEN ILL AS I HAVE PASSED TO APPLY THE NEW HYGIENE AND HEALTH RULES USING THE MOSQUITO NET, IMPROVED TOILETS,
  • USE OF NEW RULES IN THE TREATMENT OF HEALTH AND HYGIENE, WHICH CAUSES POSITIVE RESULTS IN THE FAMILY overall
  • Yes, our lives have changed as we use mosquito nets protect us from malaria
  • My family have improve hygiene wise. We now take more baths, we constructed latrines that are better, we also wash our hands after using the toilets, we also learn from a nutrition promoter from Organisation 1.
  • After the learning, myself and my household we stopped living without hygiene adhering to a hygienic and clean environment. All this was possible by the learning from Organisation 2.
  • Today we have healthier kids, I don't take them much to the hospital, I increased my production and live based on adopting hygiene practice that contributes much to the well being of my household.
  • With the lectures that we had regarding personal hygiene and regarding our yards with the exemplary mother's group from Organisation 2, we now become less sick as in comparison to previously.
  • As a result of the lessons we had as for example: Toilet construction, use of TIPTAPs, sweeping the yard and digging litter into holes and also through washing foods before consumption. These lectures we all had in the community with the exemplary mother's group.
  • For example nowadays, I do not get sick as much as before, thanks to the lectures that I had on hygiene.
  • In the case of hygiene, I have changed; now I use the toilet especially washing hands (previous I did not wash my hands), clean my yard, and wash the bathroom. These changes come as a result of training held by Organisation 2 started this January. We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera.
  • We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera. For all these practices of eating healthy food and doing improved latrines we had with support of health technician as well with staff from Organisation 2.
  • Changing feeding habits because of the reinforced messages received from the health centre staff and because climate changes we are not sure what next could come to us therefore we act in a more appropriate way avoid possible diseases. Changing the hygiene of the household and be more careful washing food products. These avoid and minimize the risk of being exposed to diseases.
  • This change is all over my family, because we have benefited a lot in terms of keeping good health. I have changed a lot, thanks to the teachings that I had in the group of exemplary mothers.
  • As per hygiene practice this had changed quite a lot, now we pay more attention to details such as washing hands after toilet use, we clean our yard and inside the house, we place trash on pits and those are full we close it and open new pit. We use soap and ash after using the toilet. We appreciate all of this from the hygiene and sanitation promotors form Organisation 2 and health technician (government). Since we learned we have not stopped doing what we learned and this is not different with other members from my household as we looking for wellbeing.
  • Due to our health and maintain healthier we eat balanced food and adopted hygiene practices like washing hands with soap. This was learned by through the Organisation 2 Project that helped us a lot.
~Hygiene and sanitation 1 passages
  • At the hospital they said that my feet problems were as a result of age and malaria as a result of mosquitoes. The children slept without mosquito nets as we have not received them in a while.
Health care 5 passages
  • We like to visit tradition healers instead of going to the hospital, we now visit the hospital whenever we feel a need to.
  • Yes, there has been changes because I control my health at the hospital and my personal hygiene has improved a lot.
  • we stopped using the traditional doctors as we did before because we have seen that they were not able to give medication to some disease such as malaria, diarrhoea those need hospital.
  • For such things, we have attended the health centre services to avoid getting worst.
  • Yet this year I do not get much sick due to the follow up on the prescription given at the hospital.
~Health care 2 passages
  • And my health gets worse for the fact that I am taking medication that I'm not even sure what are there for. The hospital do not have the attention of explaining it.
  • I have gone to the hospital but they have nothing to say as they only give us pills. There has been no changes in regards to my sickness
Production and income 4 passages
  • More production and this promotes good health.
  • With these changes I can keep my family in good health and I can have what to eat to improve my families life.
  • We did loan some money to attend to some matter of health, and with the savings we are able to solve a lot, financially.
  • I save money at the mothers group with aim of helping me in this issue of my health
Diet and nutrition 26 passages
  • Taboo's as such are now obsolete, my religion allows for us to eat everything. I think this is good indeed, because this way we grow healthier.
  • They cannot eat anything else because breast milk is good for them to grow healthy, for babies, and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies)
  • During this season the children and women in my household eat well, which was not the case some time back, the children would easily get sick this is because they never had nutrition.
  • we did not have a good diet and as a result my household members easily got sick. With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • it is recommended that I eat to avoid Anaemia. I follow the recommendations to keep healthy.
  • Yes, I eat meat, chicken, butter milk, because I can now afford to eat what I want, all to improve my family's health.
  • My wife did not eat eggs when she was pregnant and she would have sick babies. Along with the help of Organisation 1 regardless of the fact that I had no little kids but I had a lot, my daughter in law did not have these problems.
  • We suffered malnutrition and as a result we were not as healthy as we should have been. With the arrival of Organisation 1, along with the various changes regarding nutrition, nowadays, thank God with production and the money we earn we now have a diversity of food.
  • before giving birth my wife participated in the program for giving birth where she received good training on how to take care of the baby
  • The mother's milk contains all proteins necessary for healthy growth. For all my sons they only had maternal milk, but after 6months they introduced other meals. He has three or more meals per day with life's improvement they eat well. This was different with the previous babies, we never had the lessons but now we are aware since Organisation 1 came about.
  • We no longer have Taboo's, because the government's intervention, in health NGO's in our locations. Women are free to eat what they want, Taboo's no longer exist. Only in the old times. These changes are good because women go through their pregnancy without problems.
  • Some from my garden and it is the reason I am healthy.
  • the children and women of my house ate well, which didn't happen before when they would easily get sick because of lack of nutrition.
  • AFTER, THE GOOD WAYS OF CONSERVATION OF FOOD AND VARIETIES IN FOODS HELPED A GOOD RESULT IN THE HEALTH OF THE FAMILY.
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • I HAVE AS THE MAIN REASON OF THIS CHANGES GOOD NUTRITION AND THE WELFARE OF THE HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY.
  • THE MAIN REASON IS GOOD HEALTH AND BODY DEVELOPMENT IS BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN VARIETY OF FOOD. I believe yes because they have eaten 3 meals a day as learned from Organisation 1 . Therefore my children are growing very well with good body muscles
  • There has been changes because we now buy better food, like fruits, soya Porridge, millet porridge anyways they growth up healthy
  • IT CHANGED BECAUSE THE HEALTH OF CHILDREN HAS BEEN HEALTHY WITH A GOOD PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL GROWTH.
  • These changed after the training held on mothers group and some explanation from the hospital. We are now eating properly and we have broken the taboo that says women breastfeeding cannot eat an egg. These changes are good as we can see healthier and beautiful babies.
  • I gave these children porridge that I mix with peanuts and drumsticks which I learnt from the groups of Organisation 2. We now look to provide three meals, as we only had two meals per day and we did not look god food with good vitamins, ever since the lessons we now see the importance. We no longer have taboos in my family we eat everything for example: Pregnant women did not eat eggs or otherwise our children would grow without hair which was undesirable and as a result we never ate. We now know that we were losing out on vitamins for a babies healthy growth. These changes are good because we are able to have healthy babies.
  • Also to avoid diseases, we eat many fruits such as oranges that contain vitamins, we knew about it before yet we did not practice just because of lack of habit, yet now with reinforcement from the staff at the health centre we have started adopting these practices.
  • Changing feeding habits because of the reinforced messages received from the health centre staff and because climate changes we are not sure what next could come to us therefore we act in a more appropriate way avoid possible diseases. Changing the hygiene of the household and be more careful washing food products. These avoid and minimize the risk of being exposed to diseases.
  • They health has improved as we always have a variety of foods and we live with the bound of hygiene.
  • I eat different food such as orange sweet potato, soya porridge, porridge mixed with peanuts and eggs because for my health it was necessary. Also I would work a beat more sort of exercises and have food with little oil to avoid other diseases. These was learned from Organisation 2 project.
  • This type of dietary helps maintain healthier child that facilitates the growing process of a child, these we learned from health (government) and Organisation 2 technician.
~Diet and nutrition 1 passages
  • No change has taken place because for us to be well off, we need enough food which we do not have. Health wise we are not okay
Other influence 1 passages
  • At the hospital they said that my feet problems were as a result of age

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Closed

Households by overall, how has the health of your family changed over the past year?

The table 1 cells
Overall, how has the health of your family changed over the past year?Households
Improved of 18

Counting: Households

Households by organisation named

The table 4 cells
Organisation namedHouseholds
Organisation 1 only of 18
Organisation 2 only of 18
Both of 18
Neither of 18

Counting: Any

Households by direction

The table 2 cells
DirectionHouseholds
Better of 18
Worse of 18

Counting: Influence

Households by influence and direction

The table 16 cells
InfluenceDirectionHouseholds
Hygiene sanitationBetter of 18 +3 implicit
Diet nutritionBetter of 18 +4 implicit
Health careBetter of 18 +1 implicit
Production incomeBetter of 18 +2 implicit
Climate weatherWorse of 18
Diet nutritionWorse of 18
General learningBetter of 18 +1 implicit
Health careWorse of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene sanitationWorse of 18
OtherWorse of 18
Religion beliefsWorse of 18
Climate weatherBetter of 18
General learningWorse of 18
OtherBetter of 18
Production incomeWorse of 18
Religion beliefsBetter of 18

Counting: Org1

Households by credits organisation 1

The table 2 cells
Credits organisation 1Households
No of 18 +1 implicit
Yes of 18 +2 implicit

Counting: Infl org1

Households by influence and credits organisation 1

The table 16 cells
InfluenceCredits organisation 1Households
Hygiene sanitationNo of 18 +2 implicit
Hygiene sanitationYes of 18 +3 implicit
Diet nutritionNo of 18 +6 implicit
Diet nutritionYes of 18 +2 implicit
Health careNo of 18 +1 implicit
Production incomeNo of 18 +2 implicit
Climate weatherNo of 18
General learningNo of 18
OtherNo of 18
Religion beliefsNo of 18
Climate weatherYes of 18
General learningYes of 18 +1 implicit
Health careYes of 18
OtherYes of 18
Production incomeYes of 18
Religion beliefsYes of 18

Counting: Infl other

Households by influence and credits other organisation

The table 16 cells
InfluenceCredits other organisationHouseholds
Hygiene sanitationNo of 18 +2 implicit
Diet nutritionNo of 18 +3 implicit
Health careNo of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene sanitationYes of 18 +1 implicit
Production incomeNo of 18 +2 implicit
Climate weatherNo of 18
Diet nutritionYes of 18 +1 implicit
General learningNo of 18 +1 implicit
OtherNo of 18
Religion beliefsNo of 18
Climate weatherYes of 18
General learningYes of 18
Health careYes of 18
OtherYes of 18
Production incomeYes of 18
Religion beliefsYes of 18

Counting: Infl hs

Households by influence and credits health services

The table 16 cells
InfluenceCredits health servicesHouseholds
Hygiene sanitationNo of 18 +3 implicit
Diet nutritionNo of 18 +5 implicit
Diet nutritionYes of 18 +2 implicit
Health careYes of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene sanitationYes of 18 +2 implicit
Production incomeNo of 18 +2 implicit
Climate weatherNo of 18
General learningNo of 18 +1 implicit
OtherNo of 18
Religion beliefsNo of 18
Climate weatherYes of 18
General learningYes of 18
Health careNo of 18
OtherYes of 18
Production incomeYes of 18
Religion beliefsYes of 18

Counting: Area org1

Households by organisation named and credits organisation 1

The table 4 cells
Organisation namedCredits organisation 1Households
Organisation 1 onlyNo of 15 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 onlyYes of 15 +2 implicit
Organisation 2 onlyNo of 3
Organisation 2 onlyYes of 3

Counting: Main

Households by cause and effect

The table 12 cells
CauseEffectHouseholds
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold health of 18 +3 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold health of 18 +4 implicit
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitation of 18 +3 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutrition of 18 +2 implicit
Health careHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Health servicesDiet and nutrition of 18 +2 implicit
Health servicesHealth care of 18 +1 implicit
Health servicesHygiene and sanitation of 18 +2 implicit
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitation of 18 +1 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold health of 18 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Diet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Worse

Households by cause and effect

The table 6 cells
CauseEffectHouseholds
Climate and weatherHousehold health of 18
Diet and nutritionHousehold health of 18
Health careHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold health of 18
Other influenceHousehold health of 18
Religious rules and beliefsHousehold health of 18

holds the documents’ full text

Writing: Answer

The instruction the answer was written to
Open with the heading '# Influences on household health and the role of "Organisation 1's" activities'. State the conclusions first: which influences households credit for changes in their health, and how often, counted by household; then how often the passages credit "Organisation 1" for those influences, against other organisations, health services and influences credited to no one. Report negative influences. Write every numbered organisation's name in quotation marks. End with what limits how far the answer can be relied on.

The checks that were run

  • 235 of 235 quotations found word for word in their document.
  • 50 numbers in the answer, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI; 0 written by the AI without a count behind them.
  • 0 citations to passages that do not exist; 0 quotations not in the passage they cite.

Second coding

The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here.

The second coder's rows
  • Health links: 107 rows
  • Programme org: 18 rows

In the run's zip, under check/coded/.

The check

A reader ruled on every place the two codings differed, and checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, correcting the coding and the answer where they were wrong. The answer above is the corrected one, recounted after the check.

The check's record check.md
Counts
  • Disagreements in recode/disagreements.md: 33. Ruled for the rows (first coder): 19. Ruled for the second coder: 14. Unsettled: 0.
  • Definitions tightened in workflow.json: 2. Both are in health_links. The prompt now says a reason line counts as a health passage only under the health question, or where it names health itself. The direction column now counts a before-and-after passage as one 'better' row, and 'worse' only for health that got worse or stayed poor during the period. All 18 documents were re-read against both; the rows below are the result.
  • Rows changed in coded/health_links.json: 27. Of these, 6 were edited (nzzp4, yethw (now fe4ke), r28pn, 6kdqt, vjvy8, 8bfjz) and 21 added. coded/programme_org.json was unchanged.
  • Sentences in answer.md changed or added: about 25 (listed below). One was cut, "The pattern is clear and consistent across accounts"; a judgement stating its certainty replaces it.
  • recount.py now reports no faults: no unknown ids, no bare numbers, no citations to no row, and no quotations that are missing or not in what they cite.
Rulings on the disagreements

1. health_links.influence = health_care, MNY-1. First coder, kept weak (d9hx4). "We like to visit tradition healers instead of going to the hospital, we now visit the hospital whenever we feel a need to." This sits beside "Healthwise my family is doing well" but does not say the hospital made health better. That is the influence column's own weakness. 2. influence = diet_nutrition, MSY-1. First coder, kept weak (wj7xs). "IT CHANGED BECAUSE THE HEALTH OF CHILDREN HAS BEEN HEALTHY" is the reason given for the children's diet question. It puts diet beside children's health without saying one brought the other. 3. influence = general_learning, MSY-1. First coder, kept weak (m4hhg). The lectures "TROUCE AN OPEN SPACE" for ideas. Health is mentioned beside them in the wellbeing answer, not as their result. 4. influence = diet_nutrition, MNX-5. First coder, no row. "The change is due to the varieties in foods..." and "The motive for this change is in the diet control..." are the reasons for the children's and women's diet questions (index columns "diet of your children" and "your ... diet"). They do not mention health. This led to the tightened prompt. 5. influence = health_care, MNY-2. First coder, no row. "The main motive behind this change is as a result of the follow up before children are born..." answers the women's diet question, not the health one. 6. influence = production_income, TWX-1. Second coder's passage, added as weak (jyzvv). "I save money at the mothers group with aim of helping me in this issue of my health" gives health only as a purpose, which is the column's named weakness. 7. influence = hygiene_sanitation, MNX-2. Second coder: nzzp4 marked weak. "We also make use of mosquito net and we are well" puts the nets beside being well without saying they caused it. The other MNX-2 hygiene passage speaks of "well being" (already weak). 8. influence = general_learning, MNY-1. Second coder: firm. "with the help from NGO's that transmit knowledge to us and as a result everything is changing for the better. In mental health, physical, emotional, and spiritual health everything is well and this changes for the better for us." The "as a result" carries over to physical health. The row's quote was extended to the end of the sentence, so its id changed from yethw to fe4ke. 9. influence = production_income, MNY-3. First coder: firm (8srxm). "With these changes I can keep my family in good health" (savings) states the effect, not a hope. 10. influence = hygiene_sanitation, MSX-4. Second coder: firm. r28pn ("we assume ... perhaps this could be the reason why we would be sick") says that lacking the practices caused sickness. Hedging is not a weakness the definition names. The health reason sentence "there has been changes because I control my health at the hospital and my personal hygiene has improved a lot" also names hygiene, so a hygiene row was added on it (wgbuh-2) beside the health-care row. 11. influence = hygiene_sanitation, TWX-3. Second coder: weak. "Due to our health and maintain healthier we eat balanced food and adopted hygiene practices" gives health as the purpose (6kdqt marked weak). The second coder's other passage ("...as we looking for wellbeing", crediting "Organisation 2" and the government health technician) was added as weak (gf25e). 12–17. direction = worse, MNX-3, MNX-4, MNY-1, MNY-2, MNY-5, MSX-4. First coder in all six, so no 'worse' rows. Each passage tells of sickness before a change the same passage credits: "the children would easily get sick this is because they never had nutrition" (MNX-3), "we did not have a good diet and as a result my household members easily got sick. With the help of Organisation 1..." (MNX-4), "My wife did not eat eggs ... Along with the help of Organisation 1 ... my daughter in law did not have these problems" (MNY-1), "We suffered malnutrition ... With the arrival of Organisation 1..." (MNY-2), "which didn't happen before when they would easily get sick because of lack of nutrition" (MNY-5), "in the past we did not do it perhaps this could be the reason why we would be sick" (MSX-4). The old definition ("health not improving because of the influence or its lack") did not settle this, so the direction column was tightened. 18. direction = better, MNX-1. Second coder: firm row added (gug5t). "Taboo's as such are now obsolete, my religion allows for us to eat everything. I think this is good indeed, because this way we grow healthier." The respondent is speaking of her own household ("we"). The hygiene row nydsg stays weak. 19. credits_organisation_1 = no, MNX-5. First coder. The second coder's passages are the diet reasons ruled out in 4. 20. credits_organisation_1 = no, MNX-6. Second coder: row added (6nk7r). The health reason "The reason is good hygiene practices and good health and also for having stuck to the good manners in my household" names no organisation. 21. credits_organisation_1 = yes, MNY-1. First coder: prtbk is firm. The passage names "Organisation 1" and a change in health (no more "sick babies"). 22. credits_organisation_1 = no, MNY-2. Second coder: row added (zc2gh). The health reason "The main cause for this change is a result of the teachings of good practices ... good hygiene and health" names no one. 23. credits_organisation_1 = yes, MNY-3. First coder: bd7xc stays weak. "The mother's milk contains all proteins necessary for healthy growth" states a general fact; it does not say the children's health changed. 24. credits_organisation_1 = no, MSY-1. Second coder: row added (hyd24). "USE OF NEW RULES IN THE TREATMENT OF HEALTH AND HYGIENE, WHICH CAUSES POSITIVE RESULTS IN THE FAMILY overall" is the health reason and names no organisation. 25. credits_organisation_1 = no, MSY-2. Second coder: row added (6ux37). "Yes, our lives have changed as we use mosquito nets protect us from malaria" is a firm hygiene link with no organisation named. 26. credits_other_organisation = yes, TWX-2. First coder: 7gvbu is firm. "These changes come as a result of training held by Organisation 2 ... at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera" states the change against past sickness, and the respondent opens by saying "I did not get sick much compared to the last years". 27. credits_health_services = yes, MNY-1. First coder, the same weak row as 1. 28. credits_health_services = no, MNX-5. Second coder: row added (tr24g). "The main reason for the changes was how I changed the use of good practices pf hygiene and health (learned from Organisation 1)" credits "Organisation 1" alone. 29. credits_health_services = yes, MNY-2. First coder, as in 5. 30. credits_health_services = yes, MSX-1. First coder: f4d3f stays weak. "HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY" names nutrition, not health. The nearby "3 MEALS A DAY TO HELP GOOD HEALTH" gives health as a purpose. 31. credits_health_services = no, MSX-4. Second coder: there are firm hygiene rows with no health-service credit (r28pn, wgbuh-2). 32. credits_health_services = no, MSY-1. Second coder, from the row added in 24. 33. credits_health_services = no, TWX-3. Second coder: vjvy8 marked weak. "because for my health it was necessary ... to avoid other diseases" gives health as a purpose. 6kdqt is weak as in 11.

Omissions found

Each of these was found by searching the documents a count or sentence left out, against the column's definition.

  • Hygiene credited without naming "Organisation 1" (t_infl_org1, hygiene/no), and the tightened prompt. Health reason lines that both coders had skipped were added as firm hygiene rows naming no one: MNX-3 "The main motive for this change was the use of good practices of hygiene and health in my family in my household." (s5k4b); MNX-4 "The motive for this change is good practices in health and hygiene." (58jbr); MNY-3 "There has been improvement because I am learning how to live well with my family, and how to take care our hygiene..." (34vgd); MNY-5 "THE MAIN REASON FOR THIS CHANGE WAS ON FORMING GOOD PRACTICES FOR USE OF GOOD HYGIENE AND PRACTICE PRACTICES." (79vhp); TWX-1 "As a result of the lessons we had as for example: Toilet construction, use of TIPTAPs..." (hcwds) and "For example nowadays, I do not get sick as much as before, thanks to the lectures that I had on hygiene." (gdw7w); TWX-2 "Changing feeding habits because of the reinforced messages received from the health centre staff ... These avoid and minimize the risk of being exposed to diseases." (9dtdw diet, credits health services; 9dtdw-2 hygiene). With the ruled rows, the answer's old claim that hygiene was credited "without naming any source" in a set of households was wrong. Many of those passages name "Organisation 2", and most of those households name "Organisation 1" in another passage. The claim is corrected.
  • Health services credited for hygiene (t_infl_hs, hygiene/yes; was MNX-5, MSX-2, MSY-1). TWX-2: "For all these practices of eating healthy food and doing improved latrines we had with support of health technician as well with staff from Organisation 2." This is joined to the past sickness, so it was added firm (tgj25). MSX-4: "the hospital had always informed us on taking care of hygiene ... We were complete wrong today we see that." This was added weak (q8hqe): beside health, not said to cause it.
  • Diet (t_influence, diet/better). MSX-4: "we now buy better food, like fruits, soya Porridge, millet porridge anyways they growth up healthy". This was added weak (qk98f): diet beside children's health.
  • Production or income (t_influence, production/better). TWX-1 was added weak (jyzvv, ruling 6).
  • "Each of these influences comes from a single household" (worse). TWX-2 second respondent: "I have gone to the hospital but they have nothing to say as they only give us pills. There has been no changes in regards to my sickness". This was added as health care, worse, weak (kdm9d): treatment beside no change. The sentence now says health care is the exception.
  • "Lessons or help in general ... is only ever hinted at". This was contradicted by MNY-1 (ruling 8). The sentence was corrected to one firm and one hint.
  • Searched with nothing to add: credit to "Organisation 1" for health care or income (none in any document); any interview naming both organisations (none); "Organisation 1" credited for a negative influence (none); further 'worse' influences (MSX-4's "I got more sick this year ... I do not know why" gives no cause, so it is not coded but is named in the answer as an account against).
Rows changed for the report check
  • TWX-3 8bfjz marked weak. "This type of dietary helps maintain healthier child..." is a general statement. The household has no children of that age ("As per babies 6 months to 2 years old also don't have it"), so it does not state that household members' health changed. With vjvy8 also weak, TWX-3's diet credit, including its credit to "Organisation 2" and to health services for diet, is now a hint.
Sentences changed in answer.md
  • Opening: the answer is put first. Counts were added for diet. General learning was added. "The three households ... give 'Organisation 2' the same role" became "a similar place for hygiene, and less firmly for diet" (TWX-3's credit is now weak). "The pattern is clear and consistent across accounts" became a judgement with its certainty. The accounts that go against it were named (MNX-1, MSX-4, TWX-1, TWX-2).
  • "{t_any.c1} households ... with {t_any.c1.weak} more only hinting" became "all {t_any.c1}" after ruling 18. A sentence was added quoting the four respondents whose own health was poor or worse.
  • Hygiene bullet: the hinting households and why they only hint were added.
  • Diet bullet: "Most often the link is children who used to fall ill" was overstated. Only MNX-3, MNY-5 and MNY-1 say children fell ill. It became "Many of these accounts concern children and babies, some of whom used to fall ill". MNX-1's taboo row was cited.
  • Production bullet: MNY-3's quotation was added.
  • General learning bullet: corrected from "only ever hinted at" (ruling 8).
  • Org1 section: the hinting households (MNX-1, MNY-3) were named. MSX-4 "names Organisation 1 for farming" was made exact: "only for storing its harvest" (programme_org.7nzge). "differs sharply" became "differs". Hygiene versus diet is now said to survive one household read the other way, but to narrow.
  • Hygiene bullet: "hygiene is credited without naming any source in the passage" was wrong. The cell counts passages not naming "Organisation 1", and in the TWX households these name "Organisation 2". It is corrected, and the households that never name "Organisation 1" for hygiene are listed (MNY-3, MSX-4; MNY-1 hinting).
  • Diet bullet: the comparison with households that "credit diet without naming it" was reworded. That cell includes MNX-1's lack of food, which made health worse.
  • Health care and income bullet: "[programme_org.6gnbd]" was cited for farm credit, but that row quotes MNX-4's hygiene passage. It was replaced by programme_org.shtz5. "Many" became "Several". MNY-2's row was cited beside MNX-4's.
  • Health services paragraph: counts were recomputed, and treatment was marked "for better or worse" (it includes TWX-1's worsening). A comparison was added: health services against "Organisation 1" in its area, with documents named.
  • "Organisation 2" paragraph: "takes the place" became "takes a similar place". The claim that these households "credit the health centre more often for diet and treatment" was split. Treatment holds in these documents but rests on three households. Diet (TWX-1, TWX-2 against MNX-2, MNY-3) is unclear with this few documents.
  • Worse section: the households were named. "for reasons unconnected to 'Organisation 1'" became "No passage connects these influences to 'Organisation 1'". "Each ... from a single household" now excepts health care (TWX-2 hint).
  • MNX-1 quotations: "We try to change but we still do get sick even though we make use of mosquito nets" was cited to health_links.nydsg, which does not hold it. It is now attributed to the document (MNX-1), and nydsg is cited for the hinted credit only. "This year things are getting worst, we often get sicker" now carries its id (MNX-1).
  • Limits: "'Organisation 1' is named throughout" became "throughout its area's interviews" (the TWX interviews never name it). "The coding was done by one analyst" was wrong: there were two coders, and the rulings and tightened definitions are described.

The record

This report was drawn directly from the run's zip, across-the-18-household-interviews-what-influences-2026-10-13-revision-7-f5fc35b4.zip, with Rubicon 0.1.0+26c37889970e. The zip's fingerprint is f5fc35b48b690ca11bc85fc92df504840ecb95edfdf267db4927e4eefd5370ee. It is the SHA-256 of the zip's SHA256SUMS file, which lists the SHA-256 of every other file in the zip, so changing any file breaks the match. To check that the zip is the one this report was drawn from, unzip it, run sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS, then sha256sum SHA256SUMS, and compare the result with the fingerprint above. Rubicon's own code, which is public, checks the rest: python verify.py <report> <zip> recounts every number from the coded passages in the zip, draws the report again from the zip and says whether it matches this one exactly.

Revisions

Changes made after the first report, each recounted and checked before this version was drawn. Earlier versions keep their own files.

  • 9 October 2026: The evaluator asked for causal maps of the paths the answer reports, and for the title to read "the role of "Organisation 1's" activities". Workflow: added the code step health_map, which restates each checked health_links passage as causal links (source to influence, influence to better or worse health) with the same quote and weak mark, by script (work/derive_health_map.py), so no passage was read or judged afresh; added two map tabulations, m_main (links made in at least two households) and m_worse (links into worse health); changed the heading in the write step's instructions. Answer: new heading; one paragraph and the m_main map added after the summary of "Organisation 1"'s part; the m_worse map added to the section on influences that made health worse. Recounted the whole workflow; no earlier count or row moved. The second reading was not run again, because no passage was coded afresh.
  • 9 October 2026: The evaluator asked for the causal maps to be drawn again with opposites combined. Workflow: in health_map, "Better health" and "Worse health" became "Household health" and "~Household health", and ~ poles were added for hygiene and sanitation, diet and nutrition, health care, production and income and general learning; the derivation script codes an influence at its ~ pole in a passage where health got worse or stayed poor, leaving religious rules, climate and other influences as they are; m_main and m_worse now set the combine-opposites filter. Coding: the seven worse-health passages recoded to their poles, read again by a second coder, who agreed on all seven. Answer: the paragraphs introducing both maps rewritten; the main map now carries an arrow from health care to household health holding both care that helped and care that did not. Recounted the whole workflow; no count outside the two maps moved.
  • 10 October 2026: Each table now says what it counts: every count names its unit, households, beside the number it is out of. Workflow: every tabulate step names its unit, and those that counted documents (t_closed, t_households, t_any, t_influence, t_org1, t_infl_org1, t_infl_other, t_infl_hs, t_area_org1, m_main, m_worse) count cases, which here is the same count, since each document is one household. Coding and answer unchanged. Recounted the whole workflow; no count moved.
  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked for one factor list shared by every causal coding of these interviews, so that health_map can be combined with the later income, food, relationships and wellbeing coding (change_map) into one table, which requires both to define cause and effect alike. Workflow: health_map's cause and effect columns now take the shared list (34 factors, written once in shared_factors.json beside the documents): its own labels, with definitions worded for any coding, and the factors the later coding added, such as Farming practices, Family relationships and Household wellbeing. Coding: no passage read again and no row changed. Answer unchanged. Recounted the whole workflow; no count or row moved.
  • 13 October 2026: The plugin was rebuilt so that a path, chain or loop counts a household as explicit only where explicit links alone make it, and so that reports say "explicit" and "implicit" where they said firm and weak. Workflow, coding and answer unchanged. Recounted the whole workflow; no count or row moved. Redrawn so the report uses the new wording.
  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked that every answer in the chapter take who credits "Organisation 1" for which change from the shared household-level step org1_reach, keeping a count of its own only where it counts something different and saying what each counts, and that every count say what it is out of without switching base for the same households unannounced. Workflow: added the code step org1_reach, taken as rows from the answer on who households credit for each kind of change (run 2026-10-13-q9tg, revision 1, 3df57ac7), and the tabulation t_reach_health, households whose explicit links run from "Organisation 1" to better health, by the programme organisation each interview names. Coding unchanged. Answer: the opening keeps its own count of households that credit "Organisation 1" in a passage about health, and adds a sentence giving the org1_reach count, saying that it counts every explicit path across the interview and naming the one household it adds, MNY-3; credit for diet, which the opening counted out of all the households beside hygiene counted out of the households crediting hygiene, is now counted out of the households crediting diet; the paragraph on the part played by "Organisation 1" and the hygiene and diet bullets now say what each count is out of. Recounted the whole workflow; no existing count or row moved.
  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked that this answer, which the chapter's questions build on, take nothing from any question's run and report only its own counts. Workflow: removed the code step org1_reach, taken from the answer on who households credit for each kind of change, and its tabulation t_reach_health; cells are now named by their coordinates, and the answer cites them that way. Coding unchanged. Answer: the sentence in the opening that quoted the other answer's count of households crediting "Organisation 1" for better health now says only what this answer's count leaves out, with MNY-3 as the example. Recounted the whole workflow; no count moved.

Every interview at a glance

Each row is one interview, each column a reason as the coding defines it. Click a mark to read the passages.

Credits organisation 1 for this reason Raised, not tied to that Only implicitly, so left out of the counts
Hygiene sanitationDiet nutritionHealth careProduction incomeGeneral learningReligion beliefsClimate weatherOther
20-45 years
46+ years

Annex 2 of 7

Steps the questions share

Handed over as shared-steps-for-the-organisation-1-chapter-2026-10-13-3b8c20a0.html.

How this report was written

What was read. Rubicon read all 18 documents in full.

Coding. It then read each document as a whole and recorded which of the two programme organisations the interview names anywhere in the document. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. It also put the passages coded in health_map and change_map together into one table, each keeping its own quotation and the coding it came from. It also read each document as a whole and recorded what the question asks, with 11 yes-or-no codes besides, each defined in the codebook.

Writing and checks. Every number in the answer, 0 in all, was computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI, and all 786 quotations were found word for word in their documents.

The workflow x-ray beside Step by step, below, draws the same procedure, a box for each stage and what it made.

Step by step

The method is the same as in Annex 1.

What was read

The same 18 documents, read in full, as in Annex 1.

Coding: Programme org

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 1.

Coding: Health map

one row for each passage that fits; 134 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 1.

Coding: Change map

one row for each passage that fits; 241 rows.

The instruction a second coder would follow
Read the interview for every passage in which the respondent says that something brought about, protected or held back a change in the household's production or income, its food and diet, relationships within the family, or its overall wellbeing. Record each such statement as causal links: one from the cause to the change, and, where the passage names who or what brought, taught or supplied the cause, one from that source to the cause. A factor's opposite pole is its label with a leading ~: code a change for the worse, a lack, or a state that stayed poor at the ~ pole. Where one passage tells several links as one chain (lectures, so better planting, so more production, so more varied food), each link is a row and the rows share a 'sequence' and their order as 'step'. Each topic of the interview is followed by a one-word answer to a closed question and then a line giving its reason ('The main motive for this change...'); the one-word answer is context and never a cause or a change in itself, while the reason line is the respondent's own statement and is coded where it names a cause. Code no link whose effect is household health: those passages were coded in the earlier health run. Code only causes the respondent states; do not infer a cause. Leave out the interviewer's notes and the 'Important link to' lines. Code a link once per household: a passage that repeats a link already coded in the same document is left out.
Cause

The link's cause: a source credited with a change, a practice, or a condition. Weak: the passage puts the cause beside the change without saying one brought about the other, or names the change only as a purpose or hope.

CodeMeansCountsDoes not count
Organisation 1The programme organisation "Organisation 1", as a source the passage itself names.A passage that itself names "Organisation 1", 'the project (Organisation 1)', or a promoter, leader or group 'from Organisation 1', as having brought, taught or supplied the cause.Unnamed lectures, groups or promoters, even where the respondent ties them to "Organisation 1" elsewhere; the 'Important link to' lines.
Organisation 2The programme organisation "Organisation 2", as a source the passage itself names.A passage that itself names "Organisation 2", 'the project (Organisation 2)', or a promoter, leader or group 'from Organisation 2', as having brought, taught or supplied the cause.Unnamed NGOs or groups; the 'Important link to' lines.
Health servicesHospitals, health centres, health workers or the government's health services, including 'the ministry of health', as a source.A passage crediting any of these with the cause.Advice from unnamed people.
Other organisations and servicesA named organisation, company, bank, cooperative or service other than those above.Agricultural companies supplying seed, banks, named savings schemes, other numbered organisations.Unnamed groups (Other influence); "Organisation 1"'s own groups where the passage names "Organisation 1".
GovernmentThe government, state or authorities other than health services.Government payments, the police or the law, state programmes.Health services (Health services); a village or community leader (Community and neighbours).
Own effortThe respondent's or the household's own work, choice, decision or business, made during the period and named as what brought the change, with no outside source.Opening an informal shop, small works for pay, deciding to diversify crops or to spend savings on a house.A practice the passage says was learnt from a named source (code the source to the practice); a named other member of the family (Family members); an intention or hope for the future, which is not coded at all.
Family membersA member of the household or wider family, or the way the family is made up, named as the cause.A husband's business, a spouse's decision, a polygamous household's conflicts, a relative's help.Relationships between members as a state (Family relationships).
Community and neighboursNeighbours, the community or a community leader, as the source.Neighbours giving food; a leader stopping violence.Named organisations (code them).
Weather and marketsRain, drought, storms, prices, demand or sales conditions acting on production, income or food. No opposite pole.Irregular rain cutting production; a lack of buyers.Weather said to bring illness (Climate and weather); the household's own selling (Production and income).
Climate and weatherWeather or climate said to bring illness. No opposite pole.Heat, cold, rain or climate change named as a cause of sickness.Weather that hurt the harvest (Weather and markets).
Religious rules and beliefsA religious or cultural rule or belief. No opposite pole.A church forbidding hospital visits; a husband's taboo forbidding something.Food taboos being dropped (Diet and nutrition).
Land and soilThe land a household farms: its fertility and where its plots lie.Soil fertility or a plot's location named as what helped or harmed production.Rain itself (Weather and markets); farming practices on the land (Farming practices).
~Land and soilLand that has lost its fertility, or plots whose location harms production (such as a flooded plain).The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Farming practicesWays of farming, keeping livestock and storing the harvest: planting in lines, spacing, manure, fertiliser, improved seed, vaccinating animals, bagging and storing grain.A practice the passage says was taken up or changed.Producing more as such (Production and income).
~Farming practicesFarming practices lacking or abandoned.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Savings and financial managementSaving, keeping accounts, controlling spending, joining a savings group or opening a bank account.A financial practice taken up or changed.Earning more as such (Production and income).
~Savings and financial managementBeing unable to save or manage money.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
General learningLessons, knowledge or help named without saying which practice changed.'The lectures', 'knowledge' or 'help' credited with a change in general.Lessons on a named practice (code the practice).
~General learningA lack of learning or help.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Hygiene and sanitationHygiene and sanitation practices or equipment: latrines, handwashing and tip-taps, mosquito nets, treated water, litter pits, bathing, washing food, a clean house and yard.Using or lacking any of these.What people eat (Diet and nutrition); treatment at a clinic (Health care).
~Hygiene and sanitationHygiene or sanitation lacking or not practised (e.g. sleeping without mosquito nets).The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Health careHealth services and treatment: going to the hospital or health centre, follow-up and medication, check-ups, or choosing the hospital over traditional healers.Treatment or use of health services.Advice from health staff on hygiene or diet (code the practice, with Health services as its source).
~Health careTreatment or care that was lacking, did not help or made things worse.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Household healthThe health of household members: illness, getting sick less or more, children's health and healthy growth.A change in household members' health.Diet or hygiene themselves (code those).
~Household healthHealth got worse or stayed poor: more illness, a death from illness.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Production and incomeWhat the household produces, earns, sells or can buy: harvests, livestock, sales, earnings, savings drawn on, purchasing power.A change in production, earnings, sales or what the household can buy.Food eaten (Diet and nutrition); saving as a practice (Savings and financial management).
~Production and incomeToo little production or income, or purchasing power fell.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Diet and nutritionWhat and how much household members eat: quantity, variety, meals, food through the hungry season, child and infant feeding, dropping food taboos.A change in food eaten or stored for eating.Food grown for sale (Production and income).
~Diet and nutritionNot enough food, less variety or a poor diet.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Family relationshipsRelationships within the family: between spouses and co-wives (communication, decisions, violence, sharing work and money) and between generations (care of children, parents and elders).A change in how household members treat, talk with or decide with each other.Relations with neighbours or the community (Community and neighbours if a cause, otherwise not coded).
~Family relationshipsRelationships worse, in conflict, or held back.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Household wellbeingThe household's overall wellbeing, happiness or being 'well off', named as such.A passage naming overall wellbeing, happiness or life in general as what changed.A change in one domain alone (code that domain).
~Household wellbeingWellbeing fell or stayed poor.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Other influenceAny other cause the respondent names, such as age, pregnancy or theft.A stated cause that fits none of the values above.Anything that fits a value above.
Effect

The link's effect: a practice a source brought, or a change in production and income, diet and nutrition, family relationships or household wellbeing, at its ~ pole where it got worse. Never Household health. Weak: as for cause.

CodeMeansCountsDoes not count
Organisation 1The programme organisation "Organisation 1", as a source the passage itself names.A passage that itself names "Organisation 1", 'the project (Organisation 1)', or a promoter, leader or group 'from Organisation 1', as having brought, taught or supplied the cause.Unnamed lectures, groups or promoters, even where the respondent ties them to "Organisation 1" elsewhere; the 'Important link to' lines.
Organisation 2The programme organisation "Organisation 2", as a source the passage itself names.A passage that itself names "Organisation 2", 'the project (Organisation 2)', or a promoter, leader or group 'from Organisation 2', as having brought, taught or supplied the cause.Unnamed NGOs or groups; the 'Important link to' lines.
Health servicesHospitals, health centres, health workers or the government's health services, including 'the ministry of health', as a source.A passage crediting any of these with the cause.Advice from unnamed people.
Other organisations and servicesA named organisation, company, bank, cooperative or service other than those above.Agricultural companies supplying seed, banks, named savings schemes, other numbered organisations.Unnamed groups (Other influence); "Organisation 1"'s own groups where the passage names "Organisation 1".
GovernmentThe government, state or authorities other than health services.Government payments, the police or the law, state programmes.Health services (Health services); a village or community leader (Community and neighbours).
Own effortThe respondent's or the household's own work, choice, decision or business, made during the period and named as what brought the change, with no outside source.Opening an informal shop, small works for pay, deciding to diversify crops or to spend savings on a house.A practice the passage says was learnt from a named source (code the source to the practice); a named other member of the family (Family members); an intention or hope for the future, which is not coded at all.
Family membersA member of the household or wider family, or the way the family is made up, named as the cause.A husband's business, a spouse's decision, a polygamous household's conflicts, a relative's help.Relationships between members as a state (Family relationships).
Community and neighboursNeighbours, the community or a community leader, as the source.Neighbours giving food; a leader stopping violence.Named organisations (code them).
Weather and marketsRain, drought, storms, prices, demand or sales conditions acting on production, income or food. No opposite pole.Irregular rain cutting production; a lack of buyers.Weather said to bring illness (Climate and weather); the household's own selling (Production and income).
Climate and weatherWeather or climate said to bring illness. No opposite pole.Heat, cold, rain or climate change named as a cause of sickness.Weather that hurt the harvest (Weather and markets).
Religious rules and beliefsA religious or cultural rule or belief. No opposite pole.A church forbidding hospital visits; a husband's taboo forbidding something.Food taboos being dropped (Diet and nutrition).
Land and soilThe land a household farms: its fertility and where its plots lie.Soil fertility or a plot's location named as what helped or harmed production.Rain itself (Weather and markets); farming practices on the land (Farming practices).
~Land and soilLand that has lost its fertility, or plots whose location harms production (such as a flooded plain).The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Farming practicesWays of farming, keeping livestock and storing the harvest: planting in lines, spacing, manure, fertiliser, improved seed, vaccinating animals, bagging and storing grain.A practice the passage says was taken up or changed.Producing more as such (Production and income).
~Farming practicesFarming practices lacking or abandoned.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Savings and financial managementSaving, keeping accounts, controlling spending, joining a savings group or opening a bank account.A financial practice taken up or changed.Earning more as such (Production and income).
~Savings and financial managementBeing unable to save or manage money.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
General learningLessons, knowledge or help named without saying which practice changed.'The lectures', 'knowledge' or 'help' credited with a change in general.Lessons on a named practice (code the practice).
~General learningA lack of learning or help.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Hygiene and sanitationHygiene and sanitation practices or equipment: latrines, handwashing and tip-taps, mosquito nets, treated water, litter pits, bathing, washing food, a clean house and yard.Using or lacking any of these.What people eat (Diet and nutrition); treatment at a clinic (Health care).
~Hygiene and sanitationHygiene or sanitation lacking or not practised (e.g. sleeping without mosquito nets).The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Health careHealth services and treatment: going to the hospital or health centre, follow-up and medication, check-ups, or choosing the hospital over traditional healers.Treatment or use of health services.Advice from health staff on hygiene or diet (code the practice, with Health services as its source).
~Health careTreatment or care that was lacking, did not help or made things worse.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Household healthThe health of household members: illness, getting sick less or more, children's health and healthy growth.A change in household members' health.Diet or hygiene themselves (code those).
~Household healthHealth got worse or stayed poor: more illness, a death from illness.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Production and incomeWhat the household produces, earns, sells or can buy: harvests, livestock, sales, earnings, savings drawn on, purchasing power.A change in production, earnings, sales or what the household can buy.Food eaten (Diet and nutrition); saving as a practice (Savings and financial management).
~Production and incomeToo little production or income, or purchasing power fell.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Diet and nutritionWhat and how much household members eat: quantity, variety, meals, food through the hungry season, child and infant feeding, dropping food taboos.A change in food eaten or stored for eating.Food grown for sale (Production and income).
~Diet and nutritionNot enough food, less variety or a poor diet.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Family relationshipsRelationships within the family: between spouses and co-wives (communication, decisions, violence, sharing work and money) and between generations (care of children, parents and elders).A change in how household members treat, talk with or decide with each other.Relations with neighbours or the community (Community and neighbours if a cause, otherwise not coded).
~Family relationshipsRelationships worse, in conflict, or held back.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Household wellbeingThe household's overall wellbeing, happiness or being 'well off', named as such.A passage naming overall wellbeing, happiness or life in general as what changed.A change in one domain alone (code that domain).
~Household wellbeingWellbeing fell or stayed poor.The same factor where the passage says it got worse, was lacking or stayed poor during the period.A passage where it improved (code the positive pole).
Other influenceAny other cause the respondent names, such as age, pregnancy or theft.A stated cause that fits none of the values above.Anything that fits a value above.
The coded passages 241 rows
Organisation 1 53 passages
  • Organisation 1 taught us how to plant and how to harvest in the best manner.
  • They taught us how to save money.
  • Because my husband no longer beats us, because our leader and Organisation 1 incriminated my husband so he does not beat women any more
  • Yes I plant vegetables in lines and I have a pump to assist in irrigation because this was how we were taught to do things (Organisation 1) according to Agriculturel practices.
  • and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies) that kids should only be fed breast milk in the age ranging from 0-6 months
  • nowadays I spend less because I learn more regarding savings, no spending recklessly and making planned purchases learned from Organisation 1.
  • we learn various good things that are happening with the help of the project (Organisation 1) that take place here leading to our well being.
  • After my dedication in good practices in agriculture (learnt from Organisation 1) I now earn more money because my production has increased.
  • yet with time I learned how to spend money thanks to the learning held by Organisation 1.
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1 we have learn better planting techniques, which are, to plant in line and while leaving some space (holes).
  • thank god for the arrival of Organisation 1 which helped me to get money through agriculture
  • With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • but with the arrival of Organisation 1 things got better.
  • but since we attended the speeches given by Organisation 1 our lives are changing, we now have dialogues in decision making in our houses when we refer to agriculture, food and finance.
  • but with the arrival of Organisation 1, things have changed gradually and I started doing things differently.
  • with the lessons learnt from Organisation 1 I now produce more and I now have a good income
  • Thanks to Organisation 1's project in 2017 which brought a lot of differences and this is because I now toss the seeds in lines, I use fertilizers and I protect my farm to avoid animals entering the farm.
  • with the lessons from Organisation 1 I now produce a lot and I have a good income from my products
  • Organisation 1 teaches us how to get along with women in our homes.
  • Many changes as a result of the teachings from Organisation 1 we have learnt that regardless of your gender you can do anything, we also learnt about good eating habits.
  • Here many things have changed with help from Organisation 1, which has created many positive changes here as the Savings groups, Mothers group
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better. I participated in the lectures on how to plant in lines
  • with the arrival of the lectures related to finance from Organisation 1, our minds have been open on how to earn money
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, along with the various changes regarding nutrition, nowadays, thank God with production and the money we earn we now have a diversity of food.
  • With the lectures from Organisation 1, which has helped me in having more control on how we spend and how we store.
  • we participate in speeches that Organisation 1 gave, which changed the way communicate in our house
  • Thank God for the arrival of Organisation 1 which brought a lot of improvements in well being of our households
  • I now plant in lines and I harvest well because we learn with Organisation 1.
  • There been an increase in my farm and in my garden that Organisation 1 encouraged us to do, we produce more things in varieties of goods.
  • This was different with the previous babies, we never had the lessons but now we are aware since Organisation 1 came about.
  • since Organisation 1 has taught us to save and this has encouraged us to save in the group savings.
  • Organisation 1 Group taught us to respect our wives and family in general.
  • Organisation 1 along with the Government have helped us be happy, emotionally, teaching us how to be all we are today.
  • I had no rules as on how to plant and take care of my farm with the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better.
  • In comparison to last year our spending habit has changed, and the way we save. Thanks to the speeches from Organisation 1.
  • AFTER THE TALKS BRANCHED BY Organisation 1, taught not to burn trees, and how to do lines and compass.
  • THE POST FORMATION GIVEN BY Organisation 1, THERE WERE CHANGES IN THE PRODUCTION OF FOOD QUANTITIES AND ALSO A HIGH SALE OF FOOD AND VERY GOOD PRACTICE IN PRODUCTION AND THAT PRODUCED A LOT OF INCOME
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • AFTER THE LECTURE AND THE FINANCIAL-RELATED TEACHING from Organisation 1. I AND THE FAMILY WENT TO SAVE MONEY WITH THE BANKING USE (Bank D).
  • WE APPLIED THE COURSES GIVEN BY Organisation 1, AND THAT LEFT A GOOD IMAGE OF WELL BEING IN THE OVERALL FAMILY
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • BUT AFTER SOME ENCOUNTERS GIVEN BY Organisation 1 THE THINGS IMPROVED A LOT USING THE METHOD ON LINE THAT I DID NOT DO IN THE PAST YEAR.
  • MANY DIFFICULTIES I PASSED BECAUSE I HAD NO GOOD INCOME IN MY FARMS,BY GOD'S GRACE Organisation 1 MOVES MANY CHANGES.
  • I believe yes because they have eaten 3 meals a day as learned from Organisation 1
  • THE MAIN REASON WAS THE WAY OF HOW TO MANAGE THE MONEY (SAVINGS) from Organisation 1
  • We started putting corns in bags tend keep in the house to avoid pests that rise in the storage room. These we learned from Organisation 1.
  • GRACE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS GIVEN BY Organisation 1 CULMINATED IN MORE PRODUCTION AND MORE INCOME IN THE HOUSEHOLD FAMILY.
  • now after the training on storing/conservation held by Organisation 1 we are able to store food or even seeds for next agriculture season.
  • AFTER THE LECTURES GIVEN BY GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, CHANGED MENTAL CONCEPTION IN VARYING THE FOOD.
  • THROUGH THE LECTURES GIVEN BY Organisation 1, JOIN THE COMMUNITY TO CREATE A GROUP OF SAVINGS
  • ALONG THE LAST YEAR THE RELATIONSHIP IN THE FAMILY AGE HAS CHANGED VERY MUCH BECAUSE I AND MY WOMAN PARTICIPATE IN THE LECTURES AND INTERVIEWS (GENDER EQUALITY) GIVEN BY Organisation 1.
  • THE LECTURES GIVEN BY THE Organisation 1 TROUCE AN OPEN SPACE WHERE EACH FAMILY overall FEEL FREE IN EXPOSING ITS IDEAS AND CONTRIBUTIONS WHERE IT IS HELPING THE EACH FAMILY IN THE SOCIETY.
Organisation 2 10 passages
  • After the learning, myself and my household we stopped living without hygiene adhering to a hygienic and clean environment. All this was possible by the learning from Organisation 2.
  • I expanded areas of my plots and also increased crops (orange sweet potato) because I learned from the mothers group of Organisation 2 Project to introduce sweet potato.
  • I gave these children porridge that I mix with peanuts and drumsticks which I learnt from the groups of Organisation 2.
  • As per last year, here in the house it has changed because besides kids eating only food for adults they now eat specially food for kids such as enriched porridge that is prepared with soya and peanuts (The Organisation 2 project by group of mothers taught them the importance of and how to prepare enriched porridge).
  • As well I do community savings organized by the mothers group and learned from Organisation 2.
  • Dialogue changed because of openness between involved parties which is a result of counselling held by Organisation 2.
  • There was rains, we planted seeds early as we learnt from the Organisation 2 project how to plant seeds.
  • This technique was learned from agriculture extension officer from Organisation 2 project.
  • Due to the counselling held by health technician and Organisation 2 staff on how to eat and maintain health and how to produce variety of crops such as orange sweet potato, soya, and beans.
  • As per who decides on speeding money is my husband this changed today we share ideas and experiences also today he accepts my opinion this was thanks to there training on counselling held by Organisation 2 through mothers group.
Health services 9 passages
  • and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies) that kids should only be fed breast milk in the age ranging from 0-6 months
  • There are no taboo's because of my participation in the sanitary unit in the hospital before and after birth.
  • The social workers of the health unit has advised a mother what it should eat or not eat.
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • IN THE COMMUNITY THIS BECAUSE SOME SAY THAT DIFFERENT THINGS WITH THE INFORMATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER.
  • We feed babies from the age range of 0-6months only breast milk as we were taught by the groups and on the lectures we had from the hospital.
  • we eat many fruits such as oranges that contain vitamins, we knew about it before yet we did not practice just because of lack of habit, yet now with reinforcement from the staff at the health centre we have started adopting these practices.
  • Due to the counselling held by health technician and Organisation 2 staff on how to eat and maintain health and how to produce variety of crops such as orange sweet potato, soya, and beans.
Other organisations and services 7 passages
  • also my water pump helped me to grow in my garden as a result of purchasing seeds from Agriculturel Company A.
  • The main motive for this is due to the good practices and with the mass production, irrigation systems with water pumps and purchases of improved seeds from Agriculturel Company A.
  • and all this thanks to the good seeds sourced by Agriculturel Company A
  • Yes, I borrowed some money in the previous year from the Bank B because I had to pay tractor rental, to improve living standards, and adding more plants to the farm.
  • buying better seeds supplied by Agriculturel Company A
  • I purchase seeds from Agriculturel Company A
  • I also started using the highest barn as I was taught by the group of the exemplary mothers and Organisation 7
Government 7 passages
  • Pregnant mothers are not susceptible to taboos because the Government have advised that women should eat.
  • I earn money because I am a war veteran and I have a right to some income from the government
  • We no longer have Taboo's, because the government's intervention, in health NGO's in our locations.
  • Organisation 1 along with the Government have helped us be happy, emotionally, teaching us how to be all we are today.
  • AFTER THE LECTURES GIVEN BY GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, CHANGED MENTAL CONCEPTION IN VARYING THE FOOD.
  • We are now well fed regardless of the fact that Agriculturel season has not been the best this year around. But with the savings, and product sales, and the pension I am entitled to by the government for being visually deficient things do get better.
  • It changed a lot we manged to have money with savings done by saving group. And we managed to purchase chicken, also receive pension that support in other needs of the household.
Own effort 10 passages
  • Yes, spaghetti, rice, fish, meat, and chicken because I have my own business besides the farm and garden.
  • I was obliged to open an informal shop so as I am not only dependent on my farm or my chicken creation and this is another source of income.
  • Yes the quantity and quality of goods purchased by my family has changed as besides through production I have another means of earning income as through the sale of clothes.
  • Yes, it has changed for the better because I now plant more which is enough to sell and plant crops which earns me money to get by.
  • Yes there been changes now, I can buy bicycles, I do have thanks to my informal shop.
  • I AM ALSO GAINING MONEY THROUGH OTHER SOURCES WITH SMALL WORKS DONE AND ALSO IN SELLING SOME SPECIES FOR THE SUPPORT OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY.
  • I have two wives who get along very well, and I as the husband do everything in my position so that the atmosphere within our home is always good, so as my kids live in harmony.
  • I have changed crops because I felt the need to diversify Agriculturel production.
  • Because we no longer sell our foods and end up hungry afterwards.
  • Last year we spend less and saved more money while this year we spend more and save less to focus at the building of our house.
Family members 10 passages
  • everything we have is due to business that my husband does and also through savings
  • Yes there has been some change as we now purchase more, and we buy good things because I have kids who also sustain me
  • my husband does not allow for me to part take in the savings
  • He has 4 wives and this makes it hard to have good relations in the family.
  • The reason is the loss of my husband which has complicated a lot in the way I manage money it has all become haphazard.
  • but with the passing of my husband things have changed, we used to share ideas when it had to do with agriculture, money and other home related issues.
  • Yes, there has been changes as now we fight in pursue for a better life and good relations, with the help and advice from my wife and had in the Men/Women's group.
  • BY MY SEPARATION EVERYTHING PASSED TO MY CONTROL
  • we are 4 women, in one household, and we are not getting along well because of conflicts in the house
  • Because I increased my production and also we have money that my husband sends every month.
Community and neighbours 6 passages
  • with the neighbours help with giving food and the community we do eat a bit
  • Because my husband no longer beats us, because our leader and Organisation 1 incriminated my husband so he does not beat women any more
  • The motive is in the change in unity in households due to the creation of the groups created to solve the problems in the society.
  • THROUGH THIS GROUP OF FARMERS, BENEFITS CERTAIN FAMILY ADDED IN EDUCATION, IN HEALTH AND ALSO IN THE GENERAL WELL-BEING OF EACH HOUSEHOLD
  • The main motive behind this changes is: we work in groups and together for the better, we exchanges ideas, and now the work is in mass likewise for the results that we can obtain overall the satisfaction of cultivation will be better.
  • People are not afraid of eating eggs because they learned, with time they starting seeing other people who were eating eggs but did not get sick or give birth to babies without hair therefore they realized that it was lying caused by people.
Weather and markets 11 passages
  • since the beginning of the year I lost almost all crops caused by raining and cyclone
  • in the previous year I produced a lot and not this year. Because the rains were irregular, sometimes the rain would not pour at all.
  • Due to the lower area that I am exploring now and also rain helped me quite much to obtain good production.
  • I did not benefit quite as much in the farm as my production levels were low due to the lack of rain. I also had problems with bugs that found their way into my farm.
  • it has become difficult to vary the meals as a result of low production levels, and not only because of low production but as a result of production going bad because of bugs and lack of rain.
  • this season/year we produced little and had less productivity which was caused by raining that damaged and destroyed our production.
  • having increased the crops such as sweet potatoes (because sweet potatoes are tolerant to any climate change)
  • today I am eating little due to the raining that destroyed all crops.
  • Last year I produce less, but this year I produced more as I had 5 wagons. There was rains,
  • Last year I produced while this year I did not produce due to excessive rain that affected the plots and because our plots is located in a plane zone/area did not help much.
  • We are not eating new food and one of the reasons is the distance to the market, and some times lack of money to purchase.
Land and soil 3 passages
  • With production of horticultures like tomatoes, onions we were able to increase production because we sowed those in lower areas were crops grow faster
  • Due to the lower area that I am exploring now and also rain helped me quite much to obtain good production.
  • As a result of the teachings we had on agriculture, also as a result of the location in which my farm is found (low ground) permits for mass production, contributing to good production.
~Land and soil 2 passages
  • Yes, there has been changes as last year was better in relation to this year. We were more productive because the farm was new, it had not been used as the sand was more fertile.
  • Last year I produced while this year I did not produce due to excessive rain that affected the plots and because our plots is located in a plane zone/area did not help much.
Farming practices 29 passages
  • I have lamb, chicken for sell just to increase on my income.
  • We started using pesticides to avoid insects that are destroying our crops and storing to have more food as well to maintain for a longer period.
  • After my dedication in good practices in agriculture (learnt from Organisation 1) I now earn more money because my production has increased.
  • things have changed as I now conserve more food to guarantee we can overcome this period
  • planting seeds in line, has helped my production
  • Yes, during food shortage period there have been changes because I conserved for tomorrow and this is after: I chaff and place into bags and store in doors.
  • The motive for this change is due to good practices in the way I plant and this has changed production and earns us a lot of money.
  • with the good practices on how I should plant in my farm, things have changed a lot.
  • The reason for change is all in the good practices and the way to plant which adds production levels which earn us more income.
  • Yes consumption during periods of food shortage has changed as I store a lot to get me through this time.
  • It has increase as I have various methods of farming, I now use tractors, fertilizers, and pumps to irrigate and this has resulted in a change in my life.
  • Yes I altered the quantities and production as I now know good practices of planting which allow for me to produce more.
  • Yes, it has changed for the better as we now plant with rules and we now produce more and to eat and sell.
  • Because with the arrival of Organisation 1 that taught us how to have Savings groups and how to harvest corn, threshing and putting into bags to keep and selling this way I can have food to eat whenever I am hungry.
  • I got dedicated to these good practices in agriculture (learned from Organisation 1) and I now earn more money as my production has increased.
  • The motive is due to the growth in productivity and sales and the process of chaffing and conserving the food quantity and also in the chicken, pig livestock for this season and with this my household has had more varieties of meals.
  • WE HAVE GROWTH IN THE PRODUCE USING THE METHOD ON LINE.
  • Increased from the introduction production of horticulture such as tomatoes, onions these enabled more food.
  • I ALTERED THE QUANTITY OF PRODUCTION WITH THE USE OF PLANT IN LINE WHICH HELPED A LOT IN THE QUANTITY OF PRODUCTION.
  • Organisation 1 brought the learning now we Have variety of production this contributed to have variety of food.
  • WHY WE DID NOT APPLY THE METHOD OF PLANTING ON LINE, EVERY WAY WAS ANYWAY. CULTIVATED PRODUCTION CHANGED FOR THE BEST.
  • With production of horticultures like tomatoes, onions we were able to increase production because we sowed those in lower areas were crops grow faster and these resulted in diversified food eaten.
  • Because plating in line and compass avoids competition of nutrition within plants/ crops therefore we adopted to this practice and now we see more productivity.
  • Manner in which we plant, irrigation and the way we harvest
  • new techniques of doing lines and also increased the size of production area this in agriculture sector. Those contributed to good growing of production (fertilizers) and increase productivity.
  • We have food stored for consumption at all seasons or say for the all year, this is due to the training held in the mothers group it was possible to sell less and store more.
  • Due to more productivity and improved cultivation practice.
  • Increase sowing and production of new and different types of crops.
  • we changed to storing food because we have learned how to store food in the silos that last longer to ensure we have sufficient food over longer period.
~Farming practices 2 passages
  • I used to mix everything in the same place. Corn, and various other vegetables and this is the reason as to why I never had good production
  • Lack of sales, lack of rain, lack of different variety of goods to plant.
Savings and financial management 10 passages
  • My family earns money only because of the savings that Organisation 1 has provided for us.
  • The main reason for change was I started having control over my expenses.
  • The motive for the changes are the speeches given by Organisation 1, gender equality, savings group.
  • Yes, the amount of things that my family buys has changed because I now know how to save money.
  • Yes the quantity has change now, we now buy and eat more diverse and different foods, which are good and healthy.
  • Also the saving group enables one to make a loan for investment
  • IN THE PERIOD OF HUNGER WE PRESERVE THE FOODS AND ALSO WE MANAGE THE MONEY WITH THE USE OF THE SAVEINGS THAT TO SUSTAIN THIS DEFECTIVE PERIOD (HUNGER)
  • I save into the Savings and I earn the money with interest. a lot has changed as a majority of necessities are attended to even without a good Agriculturel earning.
  • We are now well fed regardless of the fact that Agriculturel season has not been the best this year around. But with the savings, and product sales, and the pension I am entitled to by the government for being visually deficient things do get better.
  • for this reason I save to be able to get as much money to buy other important things (animals, plow(s), and a water pump)
General learning 16 passages
  • My self and my husband we attended training on gender equity where we started having ideas on sharing decisions together.
  • The motive for the changes is in the spending management, which are taught in the meetings and speeches regarding gender equality
  • our lives are changing for the better with the help from NGO's that transmit knowledge to us and as a result everything is changing for the better.
  • Yes, there has been changes in a huge way because the lessons we have had on how to save money, we can now make plans on how to spend or what to purchase with our money.
  • This is due to the gender equality lessons and know how to listen, this way ideas are shared and we share a lot on what we buy.
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THAT CHANGE IN THE WELL-BEING OF MY LIFE WASTHE WAY I WAS EMPLOYED THE TEACHINGS IN THE PARTICIPATION OF SEVERAL LECTURES AND ADVICE
  • The motive behind the change is the fact that before, I thought that because I am a man I am in charge, and I should decide everything alone. I have now learnt that I should get along well with my wives
  • After the learning held with mothers group I started producing more in bigger areas and theses contributed to have more food for consumption as well commercialization.
  • The way of eating changed significantly due to the training held by mothers group on the importance of diversifying food that we are following strictly.
  • Because now I have knowledge from the mothers group on how to save money
  • Due to the learning that I share with people at home and results seeing. We listen more and big solutions raise from any challenge faced.
  • I say that there will be changes because of the fact that, I now possess more knowledge in the agriculture area, health, nutrition and savings. With all these instruments, there is a probability of me progressing in the next 5 years is a bit higher.
  • There has been some changes after the lectures that we had in the groups. We are now well fed
  • I now part take in savings because the group came to teach us how and why we should save
  • I now take better care of the babies and children, all these things I mentioned is thanks to exemplary moms group who go from home to home and teach these lessons promoting change within the community.
  • Learned new things from the mother's group like how to do things in the home, how to cultivate the land. Especially my relationship with my husband is much better and we are much happier.
Hygiene and sanitation 1 passages
  • I increased my production and live based on adopting hygiene practice that contributes much to the well being of my household.
Household health 5 passages
  • The motive for this is the state in which my children are found, healthy and they have good health.
  • The motive for this is due to the changed in the varieties and the types of goods we purchase and with good health and nutrition.
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THESE CHANGES IN THE VARIETY OF THE DIFFERENT FOOD I HAVE GOOD HEALTH (HEALTHLY NUTRITION)
  • THE MAIN REASON OF THAT CHANGE, IS GOOD HEALTH IN THE HOUSEHOLD FAMILY AND GOOD PHYSICAL AND MENTAL GROWTH.
  • Yes, there has been changes as we are now well off Healthwise, a lot of good has happened, the use of mosquito nets, happiness has increased with all these good things taking place.
~Household health 5 passages
  • It has decreased because in my family we do get sick, my husband and I likewise for my husbands other wives. We all get sick and when this happened everything is affected and put on hold.
  • The main motive is due to our health problems and lack of money.
  • No change has taken place because for us to be well off, we need enough food which we do not have. Health wise we are not okay
  • No because with the health problem that we have been through in the last days it has not been possible to save.
  • Because of health issues that had to change my diet and was counselled by health technicians/nursey's
Production and income 23 passages
  • Yes, there is some change because when I do have some money I buy some food for my kids to eat as well.
  • I produce more to have a better life in the future.
  • I can buy other meals because I produce more and sell more.
  • With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • Within due time things have changed in my household as we now have a variety of foods, as I now have money to buy other foods.
  • I can now purchase meals as I produce more and sell more.
  • With this money I purchased a pump.
  • Getting more money out of sales has made me happy.
  • Yes I am now able to have three meals per day like; bread, milk for my kids who go to school without difficulties because I earn some money.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, along with the various changes regarding nutrition, nowadays, thank God with production and the money we earn we now have a diversity of food.
  • we now have technique on how to produce more and with this we get more product, we change meals and my families diet and we have a variety of foods for sale and this has changed for the better.
  • After sometime things changed I now have a variety of meals I can buy more as I produce more and with the other means of income I am now eating more foods like: bread, fish, rice, potato and cassava, spaghetti, tea, milk, juice.
  • WITH THAT WE PASSED TO HAVE MORE PRODUCTIVITY AND MORE SALE, WITH THOSE GAINS WE GOT TO ORGANIZE AND IMPROVE OUR LIFE
  • SO THAT THROUGH THE PRODUCTIVITY AND SALE I HAVE SAID ANOTHER OPTION IN THE MARKET WHEN BUYING OTHER TYPES OF FEEDS.
  • WE EARN MORE WITH THE PRODUCTION AND ALSO CAN SAVE MORE, THAT TO GUARANTEE IN DIFFICULT TIMES
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THAT CHANGE, MORE PRODUCTIVITY AND MORE GAIN IN INCOME THAT HAS MORE OPTION IN THE VARIANCE OF FOODS
  • THE MAIN REASON OF THIS CHANGE, I PRODUCED MORE AND MADE MORE AND ALSO WITH HELP FROM THE OTHER SOURCES IT GAVE A GOOD SUSTAINABLE YIELD WITH THAT I HAVE MORE VARIETY OF FOOD CONSUMPTION
  • I can now earn money through selling product and with this I buy more product to feed myself and my family, this way I eat chicken.
  • After the learning held with mothers group I started producing more in bigger areas and theses contributed to have more food for consumption as well commercialization.
  • today I spend less because I am personally producing other products.
  • It saved more money because we had more food from our plots.
  • I had production in large quantities, as a result I had enough for personal consumption.
  • last year we did not starve because we produced a lot and we had enough for feeding but this year it changed as we eat more or less because we have to buy other food from the market.
~Production and income 7 passages
  • The main motive is due to our health problems and lack of money.
  • We are eating normally, because our income for this year was not good.
  • Due to low production
  • Because we do not have this sufficiently, this contributes so as our control is more.
  • this year I sold more animals such as meats of pork, cattle and goat this helped in the household expenses and I did this business due to the lower production/productivity.
  • Because I have no means of obtaining other products, that is why I base my self in a few varieties.
  • We are not eating new food and one of the reasons is the distance to the market, and some times lack of money to purchase.
Diet and nutrition 1 passages
  • If the family / household has good relationship and good feeding I don't see the reason of things not going well.
~Diet and nutrition 1 passages
  • No change has taken place because for us to be well off, we need enough food which we do not have. Health wise we are not okay
Family relationships 4 passages
  • The motive for the changes is in good relations in the household and in the community.
  • The reason for change is because there is now unity at home, where ideas are shared and this brought certain changes in my life in my household in particular
  • If the family / household has good relationship and good feeding I don't see the reason of things not going well.
  • Especially my relationship with my husband is much better and we are much happier.
~Family relationships 3 passages
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THIS (NO CHANGE IN PURCHASING) IS LACK OF DIALOGUE, WE DO NOT SHARE THE SAME IDEAS AND THIS DOES NOT HELP FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE FAMILY HOUSEHOLD
  • The reason for this is because we do not have dialogue and ideas are not shared and he does not have time for me as he has many wives.
  • In my life and in my family the things that do not extend happiness to us, are that we are not given an ear.
Other influence 6 passages
  • We have nothing, the chicken we had all died due to sickness.
  • this year we did not produce as much because I was not able to irrigate because I was pregnant
  • because we made huge losses when we kept it all in the barn as people would steal.
  • before giving birth my wife participated in the program for giving birth where she received good training on how to take care of the baby, what she should feed the baby was flower and millet
  • We were taught good manners on how to behave, Healthwise in happiness and we learn all this from the community promoter.
  • my household saves with other women created by mothers group where each of them buys shares for investment

holds the documents’ full text

Coding: Chain map

The passages coded in health_map and change_map put together, each keeping its own identity and the coding it came from: 375 rows (134 from health_map, 241 from change_map).

Cause

The link's cause: a source credited with an influence, or an influence acting on health. Weak: the health_links row the link restates is weak.

The codebook is the same as in Annex 1.

Effect

The link's effect: an influence a source brought, or household health or its opposite pole, ~Household health. Weak: as for cause.

The codebook is the same as in Annex 1.

Its passages are those of Coding: Health map and Coding: Change map, listed under those steps.

Coding: Org1 reach

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

The instruction a second coder would follow
For each household, record for each kind of change whether the household's own coded links (the health links and the links into income, food, family relationships and wellbeing) make a path from "Organisation 1" to a change for the better of that kind, directly or through practices, joined within the household only. Quote the household's first passage that names "Organisation 1" as a source. This reads the coded links, not the text afresh.
Org1 health

Yes where the household's own links make a path from "Organisation 1" to Household health (the better pole), counting explicit links only; no otherwise, including households that name only "Organisation 2". Weak: never; a path is either there in the explicit links or not.

Org1 food

Yes where the household's own links make a path from "Organisation 1" to Diet and nutrition (the better pole), counting explicit links only; no otherwise, including households that name only "Organisation 2". Weak: never; a path is either there in the explicit links or not.

Org1 income

Yes where the household's own links make a path from "Organisation 1" to Production and income (the better pole), counting explicit links only; no otherwise, including households that name only "Organisation 2". Weak: never; a path is either there in the explicit links or not.

Org1 relationships

Yes where the household's own links make a path from "Organisation 1" to Family relationships (the better pole), counting explicit links only; no otherwise, including households that name only "Organisation 2". Weak: never; a path is either there in the explicit links or not.

Org1 wellbeing

Yes where the household's own links make a path from "Organisation 1" to Household wellbeing (the better pole), counting explicit links only; no otherwise, including households that name only "Organisation 2". Weak: never; a path is either there in the explicit links or not.

Also health

Yes where org1_health is yes and the household's own explicit links also make a path to Household health (the better pole) from a source other than "Organisation 1": another organisation or service, government, own effort, family members, the community, weather and markets, land, religious rules or another influence; no otherwise. Weak: never.

Also food

Yes where org1_food is yes and the household's own explicit links also make a path to Diet and nutrition (the better pole) from a source other than "Organisation 1": another organisation or service, government, own effort, family members, the community, weather and markets, land, religious rules or another influence; no otherwise. Weak: never.

Also income

Yes where org1_income is yes and the household's own explicit links also make a path to Production and income (the better pole) from a source other than "Organisation 1": another organisation or service, government, own effort, family members, the community, weather and markets, land, religious rules or another influence; no otherwise. Weak: never.

Also relationships

Yes where org1_relationships is yes and the household's own explicit links also make a path to Family relationships (the better pole) from a source other than "Organisation 1": another organisation or service, government, own effort, family members, the community, weather and markets, land, religious rules or another influence; no otherwise. Weak: never.

Also wellbeing

Yes where org1_wellbeing is yes and the household's own explicit links also make a path to Household wellbeing (the better pole) from a source other than "Organisation 1": another organisation or service, government, own effort, family members, the community, weather and markets, land, religious rules or another influence; no otherwise. Weak: never.

Org1 worse

Yes where the household's own explicit links make a path from "Organisation 1" to a change for the worse in health, food, income, family relationships or wellbeing (the ~ pole of any of them); no otherwise. Weak: never.

The coded passages 18 rows
  • We changed our behaviours because we learned from Organisation 1 that the way one behaves contributes to a health status.
  • this was how we were taught to do things (Organisation 1)
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 we have good hygienic and health practices
  • thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1, we were taught a lot that has been useful in our household
  • which was implemented by Organisation 1
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, ever since I participated in the lectures
  • I now plant in lines and I harvest well because we learn with Organisation 1.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 I participate in the a lot of lectures
  • BUT WITH THE BASIS OF THE TEACHING OF GOOD PRACTICES from Organisation 1
  • THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1
  • These we learned from Organisation 1.
  • WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1
  • we also learn from a nutrition promoter from Organisation 1.
  • All this was possible by the learning from Organisation 2.
  • These changes come as a result of training held by Organisation 2 started this January.
  • These was learned from Organisation 2 project.

Earlier runs this one builds on

  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: programme org.
  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: health map.

Passages taken from an earlier run were coded and checked in that run and are not checked again here. Where this answer agrees with an earlier one on passages taken from it, the two do not corroborate each other, because one coding lies under both.

The checks that were run

  • 786 of 786 quotations found word for word in their document.
  • 0 numbers in the answer, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI; 0 written by the AI without a count behind them.
  • 0 citations to passages that do not exist; 0 quotations not in the passage they cite.

The record

This is run 2026-10-13-krvc. Its ID stays the same through every revision, and the zip's fingerprint, below, names this version of it. This report was drawn directly from the run's zip, shared-steps-for-the-organisation-1-chapter-2026-10-13-3b8c20a0.zip, with Rubicon 0.1.0+26c37889970e. The zip's fingerprint is 3b8c20a0600a9e8c3caab72fbec19e4130952f8dd8a6dbde66fe75b670f8b6cb.

How that fingerprint is made, and how to check the zip against it and the report against the zip, is told under The record in Annex 1.

Every interview at a glance

Each row is one interview, each column a reason as the coding defines it. Click a mark to read the passages.

Only implicitly, so left out of the counts
Hygiene and sanitationFarming practicesProduction and incomeDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1Health servicesGeneral learningOwn effortSavings and financial managementFamily membersOther influenceOther organisations and servicesGovernmentCommunity and neighboursWeather and marketsHousehold health~Production and incomeHealth careFamily relationshipsOrganisation 2Land and soil~Household health~Land and soil~Farming practices~Health care~Family relationshipsClimate and weatherReligious rules and beliefs~Hygiene and sanitation~Diet and nutrition~Savings and financial management~General learningHousehold wellbeing~Household wellbeing
20-45 years
46+ years

Annex 3 of 7

Paths from "Organisation 1" to household income and food

Handed over as by-what-paths-do-households-say-organisation-1-s-2026-10-13-revision-5-8b42fcd7.html.

How this report was written

What was read. Rubicon read all 18 documents in full. The counts below are of households, one document each.

Coding. It then read each document as a whole and recorded which of the two programme organisations the interview names anywhere in the document. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also marked every passage that bears on the question and recorded the influence the respondent names as acting on household health in this passage and whether, in the passage, the influence made health better or worse over the period the interview asks about, with three yes-or-no codes besides, each defined in the codebook. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also read each document as a whole and recorded what the question asks, with 11 yes-or-no codes besides, each defined in the codebook. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

Second coding and check. The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here. The two codings differed in 142 places. A reader ruled on each against the text. It searched the documents each count leaves out for passages both coders had missed, and added them. It also checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, so the coding and the answer in this report are the corrected ones, counted again after the check.

Counting. Households were then counted in 6 tables, compared by these codings, and drawn in five causal maps. The annex below gives each.

Writing and checks. Rubicon wrote the answer from these counts, citing for each finding the passages it rests on. Every number in the answer, 20 in all, was computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI, and all 869 quotations were found word for word in their documents.

Revisions. The report was revised 5 times after it was first drawn, and counted and checked again each time; the changes are listed at the end of this annex.

The workflow x-ray beside Step by step, below, draws the same procedure, a box for each stage and what it made.

Step by step

The method is the same as in Annex 1.

What was read

The same 18 documents, read in full, as in Annex 1.

Coding: Programme org

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 1.

Coding: Health map

one row for each passage that fits; 134 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 1.

Coding: Change map

one row for each passage that fits; 241 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 2.

Coding: Chain map

one row for each passage that fits; 375 rows.

The instruction a second coder would follow

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

Cause

The link's cause: a source credited with an influence, or an influence acting on health. Weak: the health_links row the link restates is weak.

The codebook is the same as in Annex 1.

Effect

The link's effect: an influence a source brought, or household health or its opposite pole, ~Household health. Weak: as for cause.

The codebook is the same as in Annex 1.

The coded passages 375 rows
Organisation 1 75 passages
  • We previously took a bath per day, and we would go to the bushes to alleviate our selves. We changed our behaviours because we learned from Organisation 1 that the way one behaves contributes to a health status.
  • Organisation 1 taught us how to plant and how to harvest in the best manner.
  • They taught us how to save money.
  • Because my husband no longer beats us, because our leader and Organisation 1 incriminated my husband so he does not beat women any more
  • Yes I plant vegetables in lines and I have a pump to assist in irrigation because this was how we were taught to do things (Organisation 1) according to Agriculturel practices.
  • They cannot eat anything else because breast milk is good for them to grow healthy, for babies, and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies)
  • and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies) that kids should only be fed breast milk in the age ranging from 0-6 months
  • nowadays I spend less because I learn more regarding savings, no spending recklessly and making planned purchases learned from Organisation 1.
  • we learn various good things that are happening with the help of the project (Organisation 1) that take place here leading to our well being. For example; Having access to latrines/toilets, mosquito nets, Tip Taps (Water-Taps), digging of holes to throw litter into.
  • we learn various good things that are happening with the help of the project (Organisation 1) that take place here leading to our well being.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better this is because I now make use of better latrines, mosquito nets, I now wash my hands after using the toilet using the TIPTAPs, I drink treated water
  • After my dedication in good practices in agriculture (learnt from Organisation 1) I now earn more money because my production has increased.
  • yet with time I learned how to spend money thanks to the learning held by Organisation 1.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 we have good hygienic and health practices in which we use latrines, we wash our hands after using the bathrooms, we use mosquito nets, we drink treated water, we wash our hands before cooking, I leave trash in the appropriate place (holes). Yes, we do not get sick as much in comparison to last year as I now have good practices in hygiene and health.
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1 we have learn better planting techniques, which are, to plant in line and while leaving some space (holes).
  • thank god for the arrival of Organisation 1 which helped me to get money through agriculture
  • we did not have a good diet and as a result my household members easily got sick. With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • but with the arrival of Organisation 1 things got better.
  • but since we attended the speeches given by Organisation 1 our lives are changing, we now have dialogues in decision making in our houses when we refer to agriculture, food and finance.
  • as time passed I learn more about health thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well. Things have gotten better with these new practices, for example: the use of improve latrines, the use of TIP TAPs to wash our hands after using the bath room, the use of mosquito nets, we also was our hands before cooking, I now dump trash in the right place in holes. I no longer get a sick as I now use the good hygiene standards I was taught.
  • The main reason for the changes was how I changed the use of good practices pf hygiene and health (learned from Organisation 1).
  • but with the arrival of Organisation 1, things have changed gradually and I started doing things differently.
  • with the lessons learnt from Organisation 1 I now produce more and I now have a good income
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1, we were taught a lot that has been useful in our household, we now use improved latrines, we now use Tip Taps to wash our hands, I now drink treated water, I use mosquito nets and put litter in the appropriate place. I rarely get sick as I did before as I now have good hygiene practices and good health practices.
  • Thanks to Organisation 1's project in 2017 which brought a lot of differences and this is because I now toss the seeds in lines, I use fertilizers and I protect my farm to avoid animals entering the farm.
  • with the lessons from Organisation 1 I now produce a lot and I have a good income from my products
  • We wash our hands post toilet use, using the tip tap which has been placed along the wash room exit, which was implemented by Organisation 1.
  • My wife did not eat eggs when she was pregnant and she would have sick babies. Along with the help of Organisation 1 regardless of the fact that I had no little kids but I had a lot, my daughter in law did not have these problems.
  • Organisation 1 teaches us how to get along with women in our homes.
  • Many changes as a result of the teachings from Organisation 1 we have learnt that regardless of your gender you can do anything, we also learnt about good eating habits.
  • Here many things have changed with help from Organisation 1, which has created many positive changes here as the Savings groups, Mothers group
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, ever since I participated in the lectures which have helped me a lot and also in my household. We now make use of improved latrines/toilets. We use TIPTAPs to wash our hands. I now drink treated water, I also use mosquito nets and put litter into dug holes ever since the arrival of Organisation 1. I no longer get as sick as I used to because I now have good hygienic practices.
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better. I participated in the lectures on how to plant in lines
  • with the arrival of the lectures related to finance from Organisation 1, our minds have been open on how to earn money
  • We suffered malnutrition and as a result we were not as healthy as we should have been. With the arrival of Organisation 1, along with the various changes regarding nutrition, nowadays, thank God with production and the money we earn we now have a diversity of food.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, along with the various changes regarding nutrition, nowadays, thank God with production and the money we earn we now have a diversity of food.
  • With the lectures from Organisation 1, which has helped me in having more control on how we spend and how we store.
  • we participate in speeches that Organisation 1 gave, which changed the way communicate in our house
  • Thank God for the arrival of Organisation 1 which brought a lot of improvements in well being of our households
  • I now plant in lines and I harvest well because we learn with Organisation 1.
  • There been an increase in my farm and in my garden that Organisation 1 encouraged us to do, we produce more things in varieties of goods.
  • The mother's milk contains all proteins necessary for healthy growth. For all my sons they only had maternal milk, but after 6months they introduced other meals. He has three or more meals per day with life's improvement they eat well. This was different with the previous babies, we never had the lessons but now we are aware since Organisation 1 came about.
  • This was different with the previous babies, we never had the lessons but now we are aware since Organisation 1 came about.
  • since Organisation 1 has taught us to save and this has encouraged us to save in the group savings.
  • Organisation 1 Group taught us to respect our wives and family in general.
  • Organisation 1 along with the Government have helped us be happy, emotionally, teaching us how to be all we are today.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 I participate in the a lot of lectures in which we learnt how to use latrines and we now have Tip Taps to wash our hands, we now drink treated water, we use mosquito nets and we make use of mosquito nets, and I dump litter in the right place (holes). I no longer get sick as much and I do have better hygienic practices and healthy habits.
  • I had no rules as on how to plant and take care of my farm with the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better.
  • In comparison to last year our spending habit has changed, and the way we save. Thanks to the speeches from Organisation 1.
  • BECAUSE THERE WAS CHANGES IN THE LEARNING OF NEW PRACTICES IN HEALTH CARE (HEALTH AND HYGIENE) IN THE HOUSEHOLD IN WHICH CONSERVES HEALTH OF THE FAMILY. Training from Organisation 1 was on improved latrines, washing hands after toilet use, Making Tip Taps (technique) to wash hands and also bathing more often.
  • AFTER THE TALKS BRANCHED BY Organisation 1, taught not to burn trees, and how to do lines and compass.
  • THE POST FORMATION GIVEN BY Organisation 1, THERE WERE CHANGES IN THE PRODUCTION OF FOOD QUANTITIES AND ALSO A HIGH SALE OF FOOD AND VERY GOOD PRACTICE IN PRODUCTION AND THAT PRODUCED A LOT OF INCOME
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • AFTER THE LECTURE AND THE FINANCIAL-RELATED TEACHING from Organisation 1. I AND THE FAMILY WENT TO SAVE MONEY WITH THE BANKING USE (Bank D).
  • WE APPLIED THE COURSES GIVEN BY Organisation 1, AND THAT LEFT A GOOD IMAGE OF WELL BEING IN THE OVERALL FAMILY
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • BUT AFTER SOME ENCOUNTERS GIVEN BY Organisation 1 THE THINGS IMPROVED A LOT USING THE METHOD ON LINE THAT I DID NOT DO IN THE PAST YEAR.
  • MANY DIFFICULTIES I PASSED BECAUSE I HAD NO GOOD INCOME IN MY FARMS,BY GOD'S GRACE Organisation 1 MOVES MANY CHANGES.
  • THE MAIN REASON IS GOOD HEALTH AND BODY DEVELOPMENT IS BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN VARIETY OF FOOD. I believe yes because they have eaten 3 meals a day as learned from Organisation 1 . Therefore my children are growing very well with good body muscles
  • I believe yes because they have eaten 3 meals a day as learned from Organisation 1
  • THE MAIN REASON WAS THE WAY OF HOW TO MANAGE THE MONEY (SAVINGS) from Organisation 1
  • We started putting corns in bags tend keep in the house to avoid pests that rise in the storage room. These we learned from Organisation 1.
  • WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, I HAD PARTICIPATED IN SOME LECTURES IN WHICH IT HELPED ME TO IMPROVE MY HEALTH AND HYGIENE OF MY FAMILY overall. I HAVE NOT BEEN ILL AS I HAVE PASSED TO APPLY THE NEW HYGIENE AND HEALTH RULES USING THE MOSQUITO NET, IMPROVED TOILETS,
  • GRACE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS GIVEN BY Organisation 1 CULMINATED IN MORE PRODUCTION AND MORE INCOME IN THE HOUSEHOLD FAMILY.
  • now after the training on storing/conservation held by Organisation 1 we are able to store food or even seeds for next agriculture season.
  • AFTER THE LECTURES GIVEN BY GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, CHANGED MENTAL CONCEPTION IN VARYING THE FOOD.
  • THROUGH THE LECTURES GIVEN BY Organisation 1, JOIN THE COMMUNITY TO CREATE A GROUP OF SAVINGS
  • ALONG THE LAST YEAR THE RELATIONSHIP IN THE FAMILY AGE HAS CHANGED VERY MUCH BECAUSE I AND MY WOMAN PARTICIPATE IN THE LECTURES AND INTERVIEWS (GENDER EQUALITY) GIVEN BY Organisation 1.
  • MY FAMILY HAS INCREASED ECONOMICALLY IN THE HEALTH AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING OF THE FAMILY WITH THE COMMUNITY IN GENERAL. THE LECTURES GIVEN BY THE Organisation 1 TROUCE AN OPEN SPACE
  • THE LECTURES GIVEN BY THE Organisation 1 TROUCE AN OPEN SPACE WHERE EACH FAMILY overall FEEL FREE IN EXPOSING ITS IDEAS AND CONTRIBUTIONS WHERE IT IS HELPING THE EACH FAMILY IN THE SOCIETY.
  • My family have improve hygiene wise. We now take more baths, we constructed latrines that are better, we also wash our hands after using the toilets, we also learn from a nutrition promoter from Organisation 1.
Organisation 2 19 passages
  • After the learning, myself and my household we stopped living without hygiene adhering to a hygienic and clean environment. All this was possible by the learning from Organisation 2.
  • After the learning, myself and my household we stopped living without hygiene adhering to a hygienic and clean environment. All this was possible by the learning from Organisation 2.
  • I expanded areas of my plots and also increased crops (orange sweet potato) because I learned from the mothers group of Organisation 2 Project to introduce sweet potato.
  • With the lectures that we had regarding personal hygiene and regarding our yards with the exemplary mother's group from Organisation 2, we now become less sick as in comparison to previously.
  • I gave these children porridge that I mix with peanuts and drumsticks which I learnt from the groups of Organisation 2. We now look to provide three meals, as we only had two meals per day and we did not look god food with good vitamins, ever since the lessons we now see the importance. We no longer have taboos in my family we eat everything for example: Pregnant women did not eat eggs or otherwise our children would grow without hair which was undesirable and as a result we never ate. We now know that we were losing out on vitamins for a babies healthy growth. These changes are good because we are able to have healthy babies.
  • I gave these children porridge that I mix with peanuts and drumsticks which I learnt from the groups of Organisation 2.
  • In the case of hygiene, I have changed; now I use the toilet especially washing hands (previous I did not wash my hands), clean my yard, and wash the bathroom. These changes come as a result of training held by Organisation 2 started this January. We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera.
  • We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera. For all these practices of eating healthy food and doing improved latrines we had with support of health technician as well with staff from Organisation 2.
  • As per last year, here in the house it has changed because besides kids eating only food for adults they now eat specially food for kids such as enriched porridge that is prepared with soya and peanuts (The Organisation 2 project by group of mothers taught them the importance of and how to prepare enriched porridge).
  • As well I do community savings organized by the mothers group and learned from Organisation 2.
  • Dialogue changed because of openness between involved parties which is a result of counselling held by Organisation 2.
  • There was rains, we planted seeds early as we learnt from the Organisation 2 project how to plant seeds.
  • I eat different food such as orange sweet potato, soya porridge, porridge mixed with peanuts and eggs because for my health it was necessary. Also I would work a beat more sort of exercises and have food with little oil to avoid other diseases. These was learned from Organisation 2 project.
  • As per hygiene practice this had changed quite a lot, now we pay more attention to details such as washing hands after toilet use, we clean our yard and inside the house, we place trash on pits and those are full we close it and open new pit. We use soap and ash after using the toilet. We appreciate all of this from the hygiene and sanitation promotors form Organisation 2 and health technician (government). Since we learned we have not stopped doing what we learned and this is not different with other members from my household as we looking for wellbeing.
  • Due to our health and maintain healthier we eat balanced food and adopted hygiene practices like washing hands with soap. This was learned by through the Organisation 2 Project that helped us a lot.
  • This technique was learned from agriculture extension officer from Organisation 2 project.
  • Due to the counselling held by health technician and Organisation 2 staff on how to eat and maintain health and how to produce variety of crops such as orange sweet potato, soya, and beans.
  • This type of dietary helps maintain healthier child that facilitates the growing process of a child, these we learned from health (government) and Organisation 2 technician.
  • As per who decides on speeding money is my husband this changed today we share ideas and experiences also today he accepts my opinion this was thanks to there training on counselling held by Organisation 2 through mothers group.
Health services 29 passages
  • They cannot eat anything else because breast milk is good for them to grow healthy, for babies, and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies)
  • and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies) that kids should only be fed breast milk in the age ranging from 0-6 months
  • as time passed I learn more about health thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well. Things have gotten better with these new practices, for example: the use of improve latrines, the use of TIP TAPs to wash our hands after using the bath room, the use of mosquito nets, we also was our hands before cooking, I now dump trash in the right place in holes. I no longer get a sick as I now use the good hygiene standards I was taught.
  • There are no taboo's because of my participation in the sanitary unit in the hospital before and after birth.
  • We like to visit tradition healers instead of going to the hospital, we now visit the hospital whenever we feel a need to.
  • We no longer have Taboo's, because the government's intervention, in health NGO's in our locations. Women are free to eat what they want, Taboo's no longer exist. Only in the old times. These changes are good because women go through their pregnancy without problems.
  • The social workers of the health unit has advised a mother what it should eat or not eat.
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • Yes, there has been changes because I control my health at the hospital and my personal hygiene has improved a lot.
  • I have to say that the hospital had always informed us on taking care of hygiene but we would refuse thinking that the traditional doctors would be take care of us. We were complete wrong today we see that.
  • we stopped using the traditional doctors as we did before because we have seen that they were not able to give medication to some disease such as malaria, diarrhoea those need hospital.
  • WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, I HAD PARTICIPATED IN SOME LECTURES IN WHICH IT HELPED ME TO IMPROVE MY HEALTH AND HYGIENE OF MY FAMILY overall. I HAVE NOT BEEN ILL AS I HAVE PASSED TO APPLY THE NEW HYGIENE AND HEALTH RULES USING THE MOSQUITO NET, IMPROVED TOILETS,
  • IN THE COMMUNITY THIS BECAUSE SOME SAY THAT DIFFERENT THINGS WITH THE INFORMATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER.
  • And my health gets worse for the fact that I am taking medication that I'm not even sure what are there for. The hospital do not have the attention of explaining it.
  • These changed after the training held on mothers group and some explanation from the hospital. We are now eating properly and we have broken the taboo that says women breastfeeding cannot eat an egg. These changes are good as we can see healthier and beautiful babies.
  • We feed babies from the age range of 0-6months only breast milk as we were taught by the groups and on the lectures we had from the hospital.
  • For such things, we have attended the health centre services to avoid getting worst.
  • Also to avoid diseases, we eat many fruits such as oranges that contain vitamins, we knew about it before yet we did not practice just because of lack of habit, yet now with reinforcement from the staff at the health centre we have started adopting these practices.
  • we eat many fruits such as oranges that contain vitamins, we knew about it before yet we did not practice just because of lack of habit, yet now with reinforcement from the staff at the health centre we have started adopting these practices.
  • We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera. For all these practices of eating healthy food and doing improved latrines we had with support of health technician as well with staff from Organisation 2.
  • Changing feeding habits because of the reinforced messages received from the health centre staff and because climate changes we are not sure what next could come to us therefore we act in a more appropriate way avoid possible diseases. Changing the hygiene of the household and be more careful washing food products. These avoid and minimize the risk of being exposed to diseases.
  • I have gone to the hospital but they have nothing to say as they only give us pills. There has been no changes in regards to my sickness
  • Yet this year I do not get much sick due to the follow up on the prescription given at the hospital.
  • As per hygiene practice this had changed quite a lot, now we pay more attention to details such as washing hands after toilet use, we clean our yard and inside the house, we place trash on pits and those are full we close it and open new pit. We use soap and ash after using the toilet. We appreciate all of this from the hygiene and sanitation promotors form Organisation 2 and health technician (government). Since we learned we have not stopped doing what we learned and this is not different with other members from my household as we looking for wellbeing.
  • Due to the counselling held by health technician and Organisation 2 staff on how to eat and maintain health and how to produce variety of crops such as orange sweet potato, soya, and beans.
  • This type of dietary helps maintain healthier child that facilitates the growing process of a child, these we learned from health (government) and Organisation 2 technician.
Other organisations and services 7 passages
  • also my water pump helped me to grow in my garden as a result of purchasing seeds from Agriculturel Company A.
  • The main motive for this is due to the good practices and with the mass production, irrigation systems with water pumps and purchases of improved seeds from Agriculturel Company A.
  • and all this thanks to the good seeds sourced by Agriculturel Company A
  • Yes, I borrowed some money in the previous year from the Bank B because I had to pay tractor rental, to improve living standards, and adding more plants to the farm.
  • buying better seeds supplied by Agriculturel Company A
  • I purchase seeds from Agriculturel Company A
  • I also started using the highest barn as I was taught by the group of the exemplary mothers and Organisation 7
Government 7 passages
  • Pregnant mothers are not susceptible to taboos because the Government have advised that women should eat.
  • I earn money because I am a war veteran and I have a right to some income from the government
  • We no longer have Taboo's, because the government's intervention, in health NGO's in our locations.
  • Organisation 1 along with the Government have helped us be happy, emotionally, teaching us how to be all we are today.
  • AFTER THE LECTURES GIVEN BY GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, CHANGED MENTAL CONCEPTION IN VARYING THE FOOD.
  • We are now well fed regardless of the fact that Agriculturel season has not been the best this year around. But with the savings, and product sales, and the pension I am entitled to by the government for being visually deficient things do get better.
  • It changed a lot we manged to have money with savings done by saving group. And we managed to purchase chicken, also receive pension that support in other needs of the household.
Own effort 10 passages
  • Yes, spaghetti, rice, fish, meat, and chicken because I have my own business besides the farm and garden.
  • I was obliged to open an informal shop so as I am not only dependent on my farm or my chicken creation and this is another source of income.
  • Yes the quantity and quality of goods purchased by my family has changed as besides through production I have another means of earning income as through the sale of clothes.
  • Yes, it has changed for the better because I now plant more which is enough to sell and plant crops which earns me money to get by.
  • Yes there been changes now, I can buy bicycles, I do have thanks to my informal shop.
  • I AM ALSO GAINING MONEY THROUGH OTHER SOURCES WITH SMALL WORKS DONE AND ALSO IN SELLING SOME SPECIES FOR THE SUPPORT OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY.
  • I have two wives who get along very well, and I as the husband do everything in my position so that the atmosphere within our home is always good, so as my kids live in harmony.
  • I have changed crops because I felt the need to diversify Agriculturel production.
  • Because we no longer sell our foods and end up hungry afterwards.
  • Last year we spend less and saved more money while this year we spend more and save less to focus at the building of our house.
Family members 10 passages
  • everything we have is due to business that my husband does and also through savings
  • Yes there has been some change as we now purchase more, and we buy good things because I have kids who also sustain me
  • my husband does not allow for me to part take in the savings
  • He has 4 wives and this makes it hard to have good relations in the family.
  • The reason is the loss of my husband which has complicated a lot in the way I manage money it has all become haphazard.
  • but with the passing of my husband things have changed, we used to share ideas when it had to do with agriculture, money and other home related issues.
  • Yes, there has been changes as now we fight in pursue for a better life and good relations, with the help and advice from my wife and had in the Men/Women's group.
  • BY MY SEPARATION EVERYTHING PASSED TO MY CONTROL
  • we are 4 women, in one household, and we are not getting along well because of conflicts in the house
  • Because I increased my production and also we have money that my husband sends every month.
Community and neighbours 6 passages
  • with the neighbours help with giving food and the community we do eat a bit
  • Because my husband no longer beats us, because our leader and Organisation 1 incriminated my husband so he does not beat women any more
  • The motive is in the change in unity in households due to the creation of the groups created to solve the problems in the society.
  • THROUGH THIS GROUP OF FARMERS, BENEFITS CERTAIN FAMILY ADDED IN EDUCATION, IN HEALTH AND ALSO IN THE GENERAL WELL-BEING OF EACH HOUSEHOLD
  • The main motive behind this changes is: we work in groups and together for the better, we exchanges ideas, and now the work is in mass likewise for the results that we can obtain overall the satisfaction of cultivation will be better.
  • People are not afraid of eating eggs because they learned, with time they starting seeing other people who were eating eggs but did not get sick or give birth to babies without hair therefore they realized that it was lying caused by people.
Weather and markets 11 passages
  • since the beginning of the year I lost almost all crops caused by raining and cyclone
  • in the previous year I produced a lot and not this year. Because the rains were irregular, sometimes the rain would not pour at all.
  • Due to the lower area that I am exploring now and also rain helped me quite much to obtain good production.
  • I did not benefit quite as much in the farm as my production levels were low due to the lack of rain. I also had problems with bugs that found their way into my farm.
  • it has become difficult to vary the meals as a result of low production levels, and not only because of low production but as a result of production going bad because of bugs and lack of rain.
  • this season/year we produced little and had less productivity which was caused by raining that damaged and destroyed our production.
  • having increased the crops such as sweet potatoes (because sweet potatoes are tolerant to any climate change)
  • today I am eating little due to the raining that destroyed all crops.
  • Last year I produce less, but this year I produced more as I had 5 wagons. There was rains,
  • Last year I produced while this year I did not produce due to excessive rain that affected the plots and because our plots is located in a plane zone/area did not help much.
  • We are not eating new food and one of the reasons is the distance to the market, and some times lack of money to purchase.
Climate and weather 1 passages
  • Yet we get a bit sick theses days because of climate changes (a day gets very hot and the following day get cold or rains) that usually bring flu, malaria, headache and anaemia to the all household.
Religious rules and beliefs 1 passages
  • Our churches prohibited us from visiting the hospital and as a result five of my children are dead.
Land and soil 3 passages
  • With production of horticultures like tomatoes, onions we were able to increase production because we sowed those in lower areas were crops grow faster
  • Due to the lower area that I am exploring now and also rain helped me quite much to obtain good production.
  • As a result of the teachings we had on agriculture, also as a result of the location in which my farm is found (low ground) permits for mass production, contributing to good production.
~Land and soil 2 passages
  • Yes, there has been changes as last year was better in relation to this year. We were more productive because the farm was new, it had not been used as the sand was more fertile.
  • Last year I produced while this year I did not produce due to excessive rain that affected the plots and because our plots is located in a plane zone/area did not help much.
Farming practices 29 passages
  • I have lamb, chicken for sell just to increase on my income.
  • We started using pesticides to avoid insects that are destroying our crops and storing to have more food as well to maintain for a longer period.
  • After my dedication in good practices in agriculture (learnt from Organisation 1) I now earn more money because my production has increased.
  • things have changed as I now conserve more food to guarantee we can overcome this period
  • planting seeds in line, has helped my production
  • Yes, during food shortage period there have been changes because I conserved for tomorrow and this is after: I chaff and place into bags and store in doors.
  • The motive for this change is due to good practices in the way I plant and this has changed production and earns us a lot of money.
  • with the good practices on how I should plant in my farm, things have changed a lot.
  • The reason for change is all in the good practices and the way to plant which adds production levels which earn us more income.
  • Yes consumption during periods of food shortage has changed as I store a lot to get me through this time.
  • It has increase as I have various methods of farming, I now use tractors, fertilizers, and pumps to irrigate and this has resulted in a change in my life.
  • Yes I altered the quantities and production as I now know good practices of planting which allow for me to produce more.
  • Yes, it has changed for the better as we now plant with rules and we now produce more and to eat and sell.
  • Because with the arrival of Organisation 1 that taught us how to have Savings groups and how to harvest corn, threshing and putting into bags to keep and selling this way I can have food to eat whenever I am hungry.
  • I got dedicated to these good practices in agriculture (learned from Organisation 1) and I now earn more money as my production has increased.
  • The motive is due to the growth in productivity and sales and the process of chaffing and conserving the food quantity and also in the chicken, pig livestock for this season and with this my household has had more varieties of meals.
  • WE HAVE GROWTH IN THE PRODUCE USING THE METHOD ON LINE.
  • Increased from the introduction production of horticulture such as tomatoes, onions these enabled more food.
  • I ALTERED THE QUANTITY OF PRODUCTION WITH THE USE OF PLANT IN LINE WHICH HELPED A LOT IN THE QUANTITY OF PRODUCTION.
  • Organisation 1 brought the learning now we Have variety of production this contributed to have variety of food.
  • WHY WE DID NOT APPLY THE METHOD OF PLANTING ON LINE, EVERY WAY WAS ANYWAY. CULTIVATED PRODUCTION CHANGED FOR THE BEST.
  • With production of horticultures like tomatoes, onions we were able to increase production because we sowed those in lower areas were crops grow faster and these resulted in diversified food eaten.
  • Because plating in line and compass avoids competition of nutrition within plants/ crops therefore we adopted to this practice and now we see more productivity.
  • Manner in which we plant, irrigation and the way we harvest
  • new techniques of doing lines and also increased the size of production area this in agriculture sector. Those contributed to good growing of production (fertilizers) and increase productivity.
  • We have food stored for consumption at all seasons or say for the all year, this is due to the training held in the mothers group it was possible to sell less and store more.
  • Due to more productivity and improved cultivation practice.
  • Increase sowing and production of new and different types of crops.
  • we changed to storing food because we have learned how to store food in the silos that last longer to ensure we have sufficient food over longer period.
~Farming practices 2 passages
  • I used to mix everything in the same place. Corn, and various other vegetables and this is the reason as to why I never had good production
  • Lack of sales, lack of rain, lack of different variety of goods to plant.
Savings and financial management 10 passages
  • My family earns money only because of the savings that Organisation 1 has provided for us.
  • The main reason for change was I started having control over my expenses.
  • The motive for the changes are the speeches given by Organisation 1, gender equality, savings group.
  • Yes, the amount of things that my family buys has changed because I now know how to save money.
  • Yes the quantity has change now, we now buy and eat more diverse and different foods, which are good and healthy.
  • Also the saving group enables one to make a loan for investment
  • IN THE PERIOD OF HUNGER WE PRESERVE THE FOODS AND ALSO WE MANAGE THE MONEY WITH THE USE OF THE SAVEINGS THAT TO SUSTAIN THIS DEFECTIVE PERIOD (HUNGER)
  • I save into the Savings and I earn the money with interest. a lot has changed as a majority of necessities are attended to even without a good Agriculturel earning.
  • We are now well fed regardless of the fact that Agriculturel season has not been the best this year around. But with the savings, and product sales, and the pension I am entitled to by the government for being visually deficient things do get better.
  • for this reason I save to be able to get as much money to buy other important things (animals, plow(s), and a water pump)
General learning 18 passages
  • My self and my husband we attended training on gender equity where we started having ideas on sharing decisions together.
  • The motive for the changes is in the spending management, which are taught in the meetings and speeches regarding gender equality
  • our lives are changing for the better with the help from NGO's that transmit knowledge to us and as a result everything is changing for the better. In mental health, physical, emotional, and spiritual health everything is well and this changes for the better for us.
  • our lives are changing for the better with the help from NGO's that transmit knowledge to us and as a result everything is changing for the better.
  • Yes, there has been changes in a huge way because the lessons we have had on how to save money, we can now make plans on how to spend or what to purchase with our money.
  • This is due to the gender equality lessons and know how to listen, this way ideas are shared and we share a lot on what we buy.
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THAT CHANGE IN THE WELL-BEING OF MY LIFE WASTHE WAY I WAS EMPLOYED THE TEACHINGS IN THE PARTICIPATION OF SEVERAL LECTURES AND ADVICE
  • MY FAMILY HAS INCREASED ECONOMICALLY IN THE HEALTH AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING OF THE FAMILY WITH THE COMMUNITY IN GENERAL. THE LECTURES GIVEN BY THE Organisation 1 TROUCE AN OPEN SPACE
  • The motive behind the change is the fact that before, I thought that because I am a man I am in charge, and I should decide everything alone. I have now learnt that I should get along well with my wives
  • After the learning held with mothers group I started producing more in bigger areas and theses contributed to have more food for consumption as well commercialization.
  • The way of eating changed significantly due to the training held by mothers group on the importance of diversifying food that we are following strictly.
  • Because now I have knowledge from the mothers group on how to save money
  • Due to the learning that I share with people at home and results seeing. We listen more and big solutions raise from any challenge faced.
  • I say that there will be changes because of the fact that, I now possess more knowledge in the agriculture area, health, nutrition and savings. With all these instruments, there is a probability of me progressing in the next 5 years is a bit higher.
  • There has been some changes after the lectures that we had in the groups. We are now well fed
  • I now part take in savings because the group came to teach us how and why we should save
  • I now take better care of the babies and children, all these things I mentioned is thanks to exemplary moms group who go from home to home and teach these lessons promoting change within the community.
  • Learned new things from the mother's group like how to do things in the home, how to cultivate the land. Especially my relationship with my husband is much better and we are much happier.
Hygiene and sanitation 40 passages
  • We previously took a bath per day, and we would go to the bushes to alleviate our selves. We changed our behaviours because we learned from Organisation 1 that the way one behaves contributes to a health status.
  • We also make use of mosquito net and we are well.
  • we learn various good things that are happening with the help of the project (Organisation 1) that take place here leading to our well being. For example; Having access to latrines/toilets, mosquito nets, Tip Taps (Water-Taps), digging of holes to throw litter into.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better this is because I now make use of better latrines, mosquito nets, I now wash my hands after using the toilet using the TIPTAPs, I drink treated water
  • The main motive for this change was the use of good practices of hygiene and health in my family in my household.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 we have good hygienic and health practices in which we use latrines, we wash our hands after using the bathrooms, we use mosquito nets, we drink treated water, we wash our hands before cooking, I leave trash in the appropriate place (holes). Yes, we do not get sick as much in comparison to last year as I now have good practices in hygiene and health.
  • The motive for this change is good practices in health and hygiene.
  • as time passed I learn more about health thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well. Things have gotten better with these new practices, for example: the use of improve latrines, the use of TIP TAPs to wash our hands after using the bath room, the use of mosquito nets, we also was our hands before cooking, I now dump trash in the right place in holes. I no longer get a sick as I now use the good hygiene standards I was taught.
  • The main reason for the changes was how I changed the use of good practices pf hygiene and health (learned from Organisation 1).
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1, we were taught a lot that has been useful in our household, we now use improved latrines, we now use Tip Taps to wash our hands, I now drink treated water, I use mosquito nets and put litter in the appropriate place. I rarely get sick as I did before as I now have good hygiene practices and good health practices.
  • The reason is good hygiene practices and good health and also for having stuck to the good manners in my household.
  • We wash our hands post toilet use, using the tip tap which has been placed along the wash room exit, which was implemented by Organisation 1.
  • It has improved a lot because we no longer abide by the old manners that we had, and as a result my family rarely gets sick as in comparison to before.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, ever since I participated in the lectures which have helped me a lot and also in my household. We now make use of improved latrines/toilets. We use TIPTAPs to wash our hands. I now drink treated water, I also use mosquito nets and put litter into dug holes ever since the arrival of Organisation 1. I no longer get as sick as I used to because I now have good hygienic practices.
  • The main cause for this change is a result of the teachings of good practices and the use of good manners and good hygiene and health.
  • We no longer get sick as we are more careful about our health and hygiene.
  • There has been improvement because I am learning how to live well with my family, and how to take care our hygiene, how many times we take showers during the day we do dig holes to put litter into.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 I participate in the a lot of lectures in which we learnt how to use latrines and we now have Tip Taps to wash our hands, we now drink treated water, we use mosquito nets and we make use of mosquito nets, and I dump litter in the right place (holes). I no longer get sick as much and I do have better hygienic practices and healthy habits.
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THIS CHANGE WAS ON FORMING GOOD PRACTICES FOR USE OF GOOD HYGIENE AND PRACTICE PRACTICES.
  • BECAUSE THERE WAS CHANGES IN THE LEARNING OF NEW PRACTICES IN HEALTH CARE (HEALTH AND HYGIENE) IN THE HOUSEHOLD IN WHICH CONSERVES HEALTH OF THE FAMILY. Training from Organisation 1 was on improved latrines, washing hands after toilet use, Making Tip Taps (technique) to wash hands and also bathing more often.
  • BUT WITH A TIME WALK THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1 AND THE LOCAL HEALTH CENTER WERE TRANSFERRING MANY IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY
  • Yes, there has been changes because I control my health at the hospital and my personal hygiene has improved a lot.
  • We did these because based on the learned held on the importance of using mosquito net, improve latrines and wash hands we assume that since in the past we did not do it perhaps this could be the reason why we would be sick in my house.
  • I have to say that the hospital had always informed us on taking care of hygiene but we would refuse thinking that the traditional doctors would be take care of us. We were complete wrong today we see that.
  • WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1, I HAD PARTICIPATED IN SOME LECTURES IN WHICH IT HELPED ME TO IMPROVE MY HEALTH AND HYGIENE OF MY FAMILY overall. I HAVE NOT BEEN ILL AS I HAVE PASSED TO APPLY THE NEW HYGIENE AND HEALTH RULES USING THE MOSQUITO NET, IMPROVED TOILETS,
  • USE OF NEW RULES IN THE TREATMENT OF HEALTH AND HYGIENE, WHICH CAUSES POSITIVE RESULTS IN THE FAMILY overall
  • Yes, our lives have changed as we use mosquito nets protect us from malaria
  • My family have improve hygiene wise. We now take more baths, we constructed latrines that are better, we also wash our hands after using the toilets, we also learn from a nutrition promoter from Organisation 1.
  • After the learning, myself and my household we stopped living without hygiene adhering to a hygienic and clean environment. All this was possible by the learning from Organisation 2.
  • Today we have healthier kids, I don't take them much to the hospital, I increased my production and live based on adopting hygiene practice that contributes much to the well being of my household.
  • I increased my production and live based on adopting hygiene practice that contributes much to the well being of my household.
  • With the lectures that we had regarding personal hygiene and regarding our yards with the exemplary mother's group from Organisation 2, we now become less sick as in comparison to previously.
  • As a result of the lessons we had as for example: Toilet construction, use of TIPTAPs, sweeping the yard and digging litter into holes and also through washing foods before consumption. These lectures we all had in the community with the exemplary mother's group.
  • For example nowadays, I do not get sick as much as before, thanks to the lectures that I had on hygiene.
  • In the case of hygiene, I have changed; now I use the toilet especially washing hands (previous I did not wash my hands), clean my yard, and wash the bathroom. These changes come as a result of training held by Organisation 2 started this January. We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera.
  • We adopted to the changes because besides flu that we have because of climate changes, at the past we would constantly get sick of diarrhoea and cholera. For all these practices of eating healthy food and doing improved latrines we had with support of health technician as well with staff from Organisation 2.
  • Changing feeding habits because of the reinforced messages received from the health centre staff and because climate changes we are not sure what next could come to us therefore we act in a more appropriate way avoid possible diseases. Changing the hygiene of the household and be more careful washing food products. These avoid and minimize the risk of being exposed to diseases.
  • This change is all over my family, because we have benefited a lot in terms of keeping good health. I have changed a lot, thanks to the teachings that I had in the group of exemplary mothers.
  • As per hygiene practice this had changed quite a lot, now we pay more attention to details such as washing hands after toilet use, we clean our yard and inside the house, we place trash on pits and those are full we close it and open new pit. We use soap and ash after using the toilet. We appreciate all of this from the hygiene and sanitation promotors form Organisation 2 and health technician (government). Since we learned we have not stopped doing what we learned and this is not different with other members from my household as we looking for wellbeing.
  • Due to our health and maintain healthier we eat balanced food and adopted hygiene practices like washing hands with soap. This was learned by through the Organisation 2 Project that helped us a lot.
~Hygiene and sanitation 1 passages
  • At the hospital they said that my feet problems were as a result of age and malaria as a result of mosquitoes. The children slept without mosquito nets as we have not received them in a while.
Health care 5 passages
  • We like to visit tradition healers instead of going to the hospital, we now visit the hospital whenever we feel a need to.
  • Yes, there has been changes because I control my health at the hospital and my personal hygiene has improved a lot.
  • we stopped using the traditional doctors as we did before because we have seen that they were not able to give medication to some disease such as malaria, diarrhoea those need hospital.
  • For such things, we have attended the health centre services to avoid getting worst.
  • Yet this year I do not get much sick due to the follow up on the prescription given at the hospital.
~Health care 2 passages
  • And my health gets worse for the fact that I am taking medication that I'm not even sure what are there for. The hospital do not have the attention of explaining it.
  • I have gone to the hospital but they have nothing to say as they only give us pills. There has been no changes in regards to my sickness
Household health 5 passages
  • The motive for this is the state in which my children are found, healthy and they have good health.
  • The motive for this is due to the changed in the varieties and the types of goods we purchase and with good health and nutrition.
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THESE CHANGES IN THE VARIETY OF THE DIFFERENT FOOD I HAVE GOOD HEALTH (HEALTHLY NUTRITION)
  • THE MAIN REASON OF THAT CHANGE, IS GOOD HEALTH IN THE HOUSEHOLD FAMILY AND GOOD PHYSICAL AND MENTAL GROWTH.
  • Yes, there has been changes as we are now well off Healthwise, a lot of good has happened, the use of mosquito nets, happiness has increased with all these good things taking place.
~Household health 5 passages
  • It has decreased because in my family we do get sick, my husband and I likewise for my husbands other wives. We all get sick and when this happened everything is affected and put on hold.
  • The main motive is due to our health problems and lack of money.
  • No change has taken place because for us to be well off, we need enough food which we do not have. Health wise we are not okay
  • No because with the health problem that we have been through in the last days it has not been possible to save.
  • Because of health issues that had to change my diet and was counselled by health technicians/nursey's
Production and income 27 passages
  • Yes, there is some change because when I do have some money I buy some food for my kids to eat as well.
  • I produce more to have a better life in the future.
  • I can buy other meals because I produce more and sell more.
  • With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • More production and this promotes good health.
  • Within due time things have changed in my household as we now have a variety of foods, as I now have money to buy other foods.
  • I can now purchase meals as I produce more and sell more.
  • With this money I purchased a pump.
  • Getting more money out of sales has made me happy.
  • Yes I am now able to have three meals per day like; bread, milk for my kids who go to school without difficulties because I earn some money.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, along with the various changes regarding nutrition, nowadays, thank God with production and the money we earn we now have a diversity of food.
  • we now have technique on how to produce more and with this we get more product, we change meals and my families diet and we have a variety of foods for sale and this has changed for the better.
  • With these changes I can keep my family in good health and I can have what to eat to improve my families life.
  • After sometime things changed I now have a variety of meals I can buy more as I produce more and with the other means of income I am now eating more foods like: bread, fish, rice, potato and cassava, spaghetti, tea, milk, juice.
  • WITH THAT WE PASSED TO HAVE MORE PRODUCTIVITY AND MORE SALE, WITH THOSE GAINS WE GOT TO ORGANIZE AND IMPROVE OUR LIFE
  • SO THAT THROUGH THE PRODUCTIVITY AND SALE I HAVE SAID ANOTHER OPTION IN THE MARKET WHEN BUYING OTHER TYPES OF FEEDS.
  • WE EARN MORE WITH THE PRODUCTION AND ALSO CAN SAVE MORE, THAT TO GUARANTEE IN DIFFICULT TIMES
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THAT CHANGE, MORE PRODUCTIVITY AND MORE GAIN IN INCOME THAT HAS MORE OPTION IN THE VARIANCE OF FOODS
  • THE MAIN REASON OF THIS CHANGE, I PRODUCED MORE AND MADE MORE AND ALSO WITH HELP FROM THE OTHER SOURCES IT GAVE A GOOD SUSTAINABLE YIELD WITH THAT I HAVE MORE VARIETY OF FOOD CONSUMPTION
  • I can now earn money through selling product and with this I buy more product to feed myself and my family, this way I eat chicken.
  • We did loan some money to attend to some matter of health, and with the savings we are able to solve a lot, financially.
  • After the learning held with mothers group I started producing more in bigger areas and theses contributed to have more food for consumption as well commercialization.
  • today I spend less because I am personally producing other products.
  • I save money at the mothers group with aim of helping me in this issue of my health
  • It saved more money because we had more food from our plots.
  • I had production in large quantities, as a result I had enough for personal consumption.
  • last year we did not starve because we produced a lot and we had enough for feeding but this year it changed as we eat more or less because we have to buy other food from the market.
~Production and income 7 passages
  • The main motive is due to our health problems and lack of money.
  • We are eating normally, because our income for this year was not good.
  • Due to low production
  • Because we do not have this sufficiently, this contributes so as our control is more.
  • this year I sold more animals such as meats of pork, cattle and goat this helped in the household expenses and I did this business due to the lower production/productivity.
  • Because I have no means of obtaining other products, that is why I base my self in a few varieties.
  • We are not eating new food and one of the reasons is the distance to the market, and some times lack of money to purchase.
Diet and nutrition 27 passages
  • Taboo's as such are now obsolete, my religion allows for us to eat everything. I think this is good indeed, because this way we grow healthier.
  • They cannot eat anything else because breast milk is good for them to grow healthy, for babies, and I learnt (from hospital but this was reinforced until we understood when Organisation 1 came with learning on taking care of babies)
  • During this season the children and women in my household eat well, which was not the case some time back, the children would easily get sick this is because they never had nutrition.
  • we did not have a good diet and as a result my household members easily got sick. With the help of Organisation 1 our lives have improved a lot, nowadays through production my family eats a variety of meals.
  • it is recommended that I eat to avoid Anaemia. I follow the recommendations to keep healthy.
  • Yes, I eat meat, chicken, butter milk, because I can now afford to eat what I want, all to improve my family's health.
  • My wife did not eat eggs when she was pregnant and she would have sick babies. Along with the help of Organisation 1 regardless of the fact that I had no little kids but I had a lot, my daughter in law did not have these problems.
  • We suffered malnutrition and as a result we were not as healthy as we should have been. With the arrival of Organisation 1, along with the various changes regarding nutrition, nowadays, thank God with production and the money we earn we now have a diversity of food.
  • before giving birth my wife participated in the program for giving birth where she received good training on how to take care of the baby
  • The mother's milk contains all proteins necessary for healthy growth. For all my sons they only had maternal milk, but after 6months they introduced other meals. He has three or more meals per day with life's improvement they eat well. This was different with the previous babies, we never had the lessons but now we are aware since Organisation 1 came about.
  • We no longer have Taboo's, because the government's intervention, in health NGO's in our locations. Women are free to eat what they want, Taboo's no longer exist. Only in the old times. These changes are good because women go through their pregnancy without problems.
  • Some from my garden and it is the reason I am healthy.
  • the children and women of my house ate well, which didn't happen before when they would easily get sick because of lack of nutrition.
  • AFTER, THE GOOD WAYS OF CONSERVATION OF FOOD AND VARIETIES IN FOODS HELPED A GOOD RESULT IN THE HEALTH OF THE FAMILY.
  • THE MATERNAL MILK IN THE FIRST MONTHS HELPED IN THE NUTRITION OF THE BABY THAT WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEALTH CENTER (Organisation 1 and sometimes from the government)
  • I HAVE AS THE MAIN REASON OF THIS CHANGES GOOD NUTRITION AND THE WELFARE OF THE HEALTH OF MY HOUSEHOLD FAMILY.
  • THE MAIN REASON IS GOOD HEALTH AND BODY DEVELOPMENT IS BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN VARIETY OF FOOD. I believe yes because they have eaten 3 meals a day as learned from Organisation 1 . Therefore my children are growing very well with good body muscles
  • There has been changes because we now buy better food, like fruits, soya Porridge, millet porridge anyways they growth up healthy
  • IT CHANGED BECAUSE THE HEALTH OF CHILDREN HAS BEEN HEALTHY WITH A GOOD PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL GROWTH.
  • These changed after the training held on mothers group and some explanation from the hospital. We are now eating properly and we have broken the taboo that says women breastfeeding cannot eat an egg. These changes are good as we can see healthier and beautiful babies.
  • If the family / household has good relationship and good feeding I don't see the reason of things not going well.
  • I gave these children porridge that I mix with peanuts and drumsticks which I learnt from the groups of Organisation 2. We now look to provide three meals, as we only had two meals per day and we did not look god food with good vitamins, ever since the lessons we now see the importance. We no longer have taboos in my family we eat everything for example: Pregnant women did not eat eggs or otherwise our children would grow without hair which was undesirable and as a result we never ate. We now know that we were losing out on vitamins for a babies healthy growth. These changes are good because we are able to have healthy babies.
  • Also to avoid diseases, we eat many fruits such as oranges that contain vitamins, we knew about it before yet we did not practice just because of lack of habit, yet now with reinforcement from the staff at the health centre we have started adopting these practices.
  • Changing feeding habits because of the reinforced messages received from the health centre staff and because climate changes we are not sure what next could come to us therefore we act in a more appropriate way avoid possible diseases. Changing the hygiene of the household and be more careful washing food products. These avoid and minimize the risk of being exposed to diseases.
  • They health has improved as we always have a variety of foods and we live with the bound of hygiene.
  • I eat different food such as orange sweet potato, soya porridge, porridge mixed with peanuts and eggs because for my health it was necessary. Also I would work a beat more sort of exercises and have food with little oil to avoid other diseases. These was learned from Organisation 2 project.
  • This type of dietary helps maintain healthier child that facilitates the growing process of a child, these we learned from health (government) and Organisation 2 technician.
~Diet and nutrition 2 passages
  • No change has taken place because for us to be well off, we need enough food which we do not have. Health wise we are not okay
  • No change has taken place because for us to be well off, we need enough food which we do not have. Health wise we are not okay
Family relationships 4 passages
  • The motive for the changes is in good relations in the household and in the community.
  • The reason for change is because there is now unity at home, where ideas are shared and this brought certain changes in my life in my household in particular
  • If the family / household has good relationship and good feeding I don't see the reason of things not going well.
  • Especially my relationship with my husband is much better and we are much happier.
~Family relationships 3 passages
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THIS (NO CHANGE IN PURCHASING) IS LACK OF DIALOGUE, WE DO NOT SHARE THE SAME IDEAS AND THIS DOES NOT HELP FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE FAMILY HOUSEHOLD
  • The reason for this is because we do not have dialogue and ideas are not shared and he does not have time for me as he has many wives.
  • In my life and in my family the things that do not extend happiness to us, are that we are not given an ear.
Other influence 7 passages
  • We have nothing, the chicken we had all died due to sickness.
  • this year we did not produce as much because I was not able to irrigate because I was pregnant
  • because we made huge losses when we kept it all in the barn as people would steal.
  • before giving birth my wife participated in the program for giving birth where she received good training on how to take care of the baby, what she should feed the baby was flower and millet
  • We were taught good manners on how to behave, Healthwise in happiness and we learn all this from the community promoter.
  • At the hospital they said that my feet problems were as a result of age
  • my household saves with other women created by mothers group where each of them buys shares for investment

holds the documents’ full text

Coding: Org1 reach

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 2.

Counting: Households

Households by organisation named

The table is the same as in Annex 1.

Counting: Closed income

Households by overall, how has the amount of money/food your household earns changed in the last year?

The table 2 cells
Overall, how has the amount of money/food your household earns changed in the last year?Households
Increased of 18
Decreased of 18

Counting: Closed food

Households by overall, how has the quantity of your household's food changed in the last year?

The table 2 cells
Overall, how has the quantity of your household's food changed in the last year?Households
Increased of 18
Decreased of 18

Counting: Reach

Households by cause and effect and organisation named

A path, a chain somebody told or a loop counts as explicit for a document only where explicit links alone can make it.

The table 193 cells
CauseEffectOrganisation namedHouseholds
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +2 implicit
Organisation 1Farming practicesOrganisation 1 only of 15
Organisation 1Household healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Farming practicesProduction and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Organisation 1Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementOrganisation 1 only of 15
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +3 implicit
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationOrganisation 1 only of 15 +3 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +3 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +3 implicit
Health servicesHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Family relationshipsOrganisation 1 only of 15
Organisation 1Household wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Own effortDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
GovernmentDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Health servicesDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15 +2 implicit
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
Own effortProduction and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Own effortHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Family members~Family relationshipsOrganisation 1 only of 15
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
General learningFamily relationshipsOrganisation 1 only of 15
General learningFamily relationshipsOrganisation 2 only of 3
GovernmentHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +2 implicit
Health servicesDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Health servicesHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Diet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Organisation 2Farming practicesOrganisation 2 only of 3
Other influence~Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +4 implicit
Weather and markets~Diet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Weather and markets~Production and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
~Production and income~Diet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Community and neighboursFamily relationshipsOrganisation 1 only of 15
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Family membersProduction and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Family members~Savings and financial managementOrganisation 1 only of 15
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
Farming practicesHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15 +2 implicit
Farming practicesProduction and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
General learningDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
General learningHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
General learningHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
General learningSavings and financial managementOrganisation 1 only of 15
General learningSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
GovernmentProduction and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
Health careHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Health servicesHealth careOrganisation 2 only of 3
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Land and soilDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Land and soilHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Land and soilProduction and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
Land and soilSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
Organisation 2Family relationshipsOrganisation 2 only of 3
Organisation 2Household healthOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Household wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitationOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Production and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
Organisation 2Savings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
Production and incomeHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15 +2 implicit
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
Weather and marketsDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Weather and marketsHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Weather and marketsProduction and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
Weather and marketsSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
Weather and markets~Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Farming practices~Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Production and income~Diet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Climate and weatherDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Climate and weatherHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Climate and weather~Household healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Community and neighboursHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Family membersDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Family membersDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Family membersFamily relationshipsOrganisation 1 only of 15
Family membersHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Family membersProduction and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
Family membersSavings and financial managementOrganisation 1 only of 15
Family membersSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
Family members~Household wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementOrganisation 1 only of 15
General learningDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
General learningProduction and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
General learningProduction and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
GovernmentFarming practicesOrganisation 1 only of 15
Health careHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Health servicesHealth careOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Health services~Health careOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Health services~Household healthOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3
Land and soilDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Land and soilProduction and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other influenceDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other influenceHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other influenceHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other influenceSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
Other influence~Diet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other influence~Household healthOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other influence~Household healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Other influence~Household wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesOrganisation 2 only of 3
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
Other organisations and servicesSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
Own effortDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
Own effortFamily relationshipsOrganisation 1 only of 15
Own effortFarming practicesOrganisation 1 only of 15
Own effortFarming practicesOrganisation 2 only of 3
Own effortHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
Own effortHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
Own effortProduction and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
Own effortSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
Own effort~Savings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3
Production and incomeFarming practicesOrganisation 1 only of 15
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementOrganisation 1 only of 15
Religious rules and beliefs~Diet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
Religious rules and beliefs~Household healthOrganisation 1 only of 15
Religious rules and beliefs~Household wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
Religious rules and beliefs~Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
Weather and marketsFarming practicesOrganisation 2 only of 3
Weather and markets~Diet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Diet and nutrition~Household healthOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Diet and nutrition~Household wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Diet and nutrition~Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Family relationships~Household wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Family relationships~Savings and financial managementOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Farming practices~Diet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Health care~Household healthOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
~Household healthDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
~Household healthHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
~Household health~Diet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Household health~Household wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Household health~Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Household health~Savings and financial managementOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Hygiene and sanitation~Household healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
~Land and soil~Diet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
~Land and soil~Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Land and soil~Production and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
~Production and incomeDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3
~Production and incomeHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3
~Production and incomeProduction and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3
~Production and incomeSavings and financial managementOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
~Production and income~Household healthOrganisation 1 only of 15
~Production and income~Household wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15
Community and neighboursProduction and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Family members~Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Health servicesHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15 +4 implicit
Household healthHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1 only of 15 +4 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold healthOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Organisation 1General learningOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsHousehold wellbeingOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
~Family relationships~Production and incomeOrganisation 1 only of 15 +1 implicit
~Health careDiet and nutritionOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit
~Health careHousehold healthOrganisation 2 only of 3 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Told

Households by cause and effect

The table 18 cells
ChainHouseholds
Organisation 1 → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18 +3 implicit
Organisation 1 → Farming practices → Production and income of 18
Organisation 1 → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Health services → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18
Health services → Health care → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → Hygiene and sanitation → Health services → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18
Organisation 2 → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
General learning → Production and income → Diet and nutrition of 18
Health services → ~Health care → ~Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → Diet and nutrition → Health services → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → Farming practices → Production and income → Diet and nutrition of 18
Organisation 1 → Savings and financial management → Production and income of 18
Organisation 2 → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 2 → Hygiene and sanitation → Health services → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Health services → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → General learning → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → Savings and financial management → Diet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 2 → Diet and nutrition → Health services → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Org1 paths

Households by cause and effect

The table 14 cells
CauseEffectHouseholds
Organisation 1Farming practices of 18
Production and incomeDiet and nutrition of 18
Farming practicesDiet and nutrition of 18
Farming practicesProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Production and income of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial management of 18
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold health of 18
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitation of 18
Savings and financial managementProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
General learningHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutrition of 18 +4 implicit
Organisation 1General learning of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Org1 paths map

Households by cause and effect

The table 14 cells
CauseEffectHouseholds
Organisation 1Farming practices of 18
Production and incomeDiet and nutrition of 18
Farming practicesDiet and nutrition of 18
Farming practicesProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Production and income of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial management of 18
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold health of 18
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitation of 18
Savings and financial managementProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
General learningHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutrition of 18 +4 implicit
Organisation 1General learning of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Reach health

Households by org1 health and organisation named

The table 4 cells
Org1 healthOrganisation namedHouseholds
YesOrganisation 1 only of 15
NoOrganisation 2 only of 3
NoOrganisation 1 only of 15
YesOrganisation 2 only of 3

Counting: Reach food

Households by org1 food and organisation named

The table 4 cells
Org1 foodOrganisation namedHouseholds
YesOrganisation 1 only of 15
NoOrganisation 1 only of 15
NoOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesOrganisation 2 only of 3

Counting: Reach income

Households by org1 income and organisation named

The table 4 cells
Org1 incomeOrganisation namedHouseholds
YesOrganisation 1 only of 15
NoOrganisation 1 only of 15
NoOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesOrganisation 2 only of 3

Writing: Answer

The instruction the answer was written to
Open with a heading naming the paths from "Organisation 1" to income and food. State the conclusions first: by which paths households say "Organisation 1"'s activities changed their income and production and their food and diet, counted by household out of the 15 that name "Organisation 1", with the 18 shown; then how many of those households have such a path through better household health. Report chains told whole beside paths joined from several passages. Report changes for the worse. Write every numbered organisation's name in quotation marks. End with what limits how far the answer can be relied on.

Earlier runs this one builds on

  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: programme org.
  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: health links.
  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: health map.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: change map.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: chain map.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: org1 reach.

Passages taken from an earlier run were coded and checked in that run and are not checked again here. Where this answer agrees with an earlier one on passages taken from it, the two do not corroborate each other, because one coding lies under both.

The checks that were run

  • 869 of 869 quotations found word for word in their document.
  • 20 numbers in the answer, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI; 0 written by the AI without a count behind them.
  • 0 citations to passages that do not exist; 0 quotations not in the passage they cite.

Second coding

The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here.

The second coder's rows
  • Chain map: 356 rows
  • Change map: 222 rows

In the run's zip, under check/coded/.

The check

A reader ruled on every place the two codings differed, and checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, correcting the coding and the answer where they were wrong. The answer above is the corrected one, recounted after the check.

The check's record check.md

Counts below are of change_map disagreements listed in recode/disagreements.md (77; the chain_map entries mirror them and follow from change_map through work/union_chain_map.py).

  • Disagreements ruled for the rows (first coder kept): 50
  • Disagreements ruled for the second coder: 25
  • Neither coder (row changed another way): 1 (TWX-2 hope)
  • Unsettled: 1 (MNY-3 savings to diet, kept weak; see below)
  • Rows changed in coded/change_map.json: 27 (13 dropped, 10 added, 4 weak made firm); 244 rows became 241. Backup of the previous file: _tmp/change_map.before_check.json
  • Sentences changed in answer.md: 3 (one rewritten, one scoped, one Limitations line added)
  • workflow.json: unchanged; the definitions settled every case.
Rulings for the second coder (rows changed)

Dropped:

  • MNX-4 Government to Diet and nutrition, "Breast feeding should take place in the first 6 months, this has not changed it is the rule the Government gives.": the passage says nothing changed and nothing was protected; not a link.
  • MNX-6 Religious rules and beliefs to ~Diet and nutrition, "there has been Taboo's since my pregnancy period...": does not say the taboos changed or worsened what she eats (the first coder's own unclear.md note says it was not coded; the row contradicted it).
  • Organisation 1/2, Government, Health services or General learning to Hygiene and sanitation in MNY-1, MSX-1, MSX-2 (two rows), MSY-1 (two rows), MSY-2, TWX-2 (three rows), TWX-3 (two rows): Hygiene and sanitation is coded here only "where the passage joins it to something other than health". These passages join it to health only ("IMPROVEMENTS OF HYGIENE AND HEALTH", "IMPROVE MY HEALTH AND HYGIENE") or to nothing; health_map holds them.
  • TWX-2 Family relationships to Household wellbeing (weak), "...gives me hope that in 5 years things will get better": the wellbeing change is a hope, which is not coded (work/label_settlement.md).

Added (quoted exactly; context read):

  • MNX-1 Other influence to ~Production and income: "We have nothing, the chicken we had all died due to sickness." (production answer).
  • MNX-5 Family relationships to Household wellbeing: "The motive for the changes is in good relations in the household and in the community." (wellbeing reason line; unclear.md said it was coded but no row existed).
  • MNX-6 Family relationships to Household wellbeing: "The reason for change is because there is now unity at home, ..." (wellbeing reason line).
  • MNY-2 Other influence to Diet and nutrition: "before giving birth my wife participated in the program for giving birth where she received good training on ... what she should feed the baby was flower and millet" (unnamed programme).
  • MSX-4 ~Farming practices to ~Production and income: "Lack of sales, lack of rain, lack of different variety of goods to plant." (reason line under a fall in production).
  • MSY-1 Land and soil to Production and income: "...we sowed those in lower areas were crops grow faster".
  • MSY-2 Other influence to Household wellbeing: "We were taught good manners on how to behave, Healthwise in happiness and we learn all this from the community promoter." (promoter not named as from "Organisation 1").
  • TWX-1 Land and soil to Production and income: "Due to the lower area that I am exploring now ...".
  • TWX-3 Family relationships to Household wellbeing: "Especially my relationship with my husband is much better and we are much happier."
  • TWX-3 Other influence to Savings and financial management: "my household saves with other women created by mothers group ..." (mothers group without "Organisation 2", per unclear.md convention).

Weak made firm (the passage states the cause):

  • MSX-4 ~Family relationships to ~Household wellbeing: "the things that do not extend happiness to us, are that we are not given an ear".
  • MSY-1 Organisation 1 to Household wellbeing: "THE LECTURES GIVEN BY THE Organisation 1 TROUCE AN OPEN SPACE WHERE EACH FAMILY ... FEEL FREE ... IT IS HELPING".
  • TWX-3 Farming practices to Diet and nutrition: "we changed to storing food because we have learned how to store food in the silos ... to ensure we have sufficient food".
  • TWX-3 General learning to Family relationships: "Learned new things from the mother's group ... Especially my relationship with my husband is much better".
Rulings for the rows (first coder kept)
  • Household health to Diet and nutrition, weak, in MNX-3, MNX-6, MSX-2, MSY-1: reason lines under a diet question that name good health beside the diet change without saying which brought about which; weak by the column's own test. Second coder left them out, which would hide them; kept weak.
  • MSY-2 Household health to Household wellbeing, weak: "well off Healthwise ... happiness has increased with all these good things" puts the two side by side; kept weak.
  • MNX-3, MNX-4, MNY-3, MSX-2 savings and general-learning rows; MNX-5 Health services to Diet; MNX-6 Community and neighbours to Family relationships, Household health and Other influence (theft); MNY-1 Own effort; MNY-3 Family members, General learning, Production and income; MSX-2 Family members and savings-group loan; MNX-4 Organisation 1 to Household wellbeing; TWX-1 family members (husband's remittances) and Organisation 2 to Hygiene and sanitation (TWX-1 joins hygiene to wellbeing); TWX-2 community, production and savings rows; TWX-3 production row: each passage states the cause and fits the value coded.
  • Second-coder-only values not added because the first coder's row already codes the same passage to a fitting value: MNY-1 chickens dying ("I had a second alteration as chicken were dying", no fall in production stated); MSX-1, MSY-1, MSY-2, TWX-1, TWX-2, TWX-3 General learning or Other influence where the first coder coded the named organisation directly or used General learning; MSX-2 Government (pension) already coded; TWX-3 pork sales (sales are Production and income itself, not a cause).
  • Firm/weak: MNY-5 Health services (advice stated plainly, firm), TWX-1 Health services (firm), TWX-1 relationships and feeding to wellbeing (conditional "If ... I don't see the reason", weak) kept as coded.
Unsettled
  • MNY-3 Savings and financial management to Diet and nutrition, kept weak: saving and buying more diverse food sit in one answer, joined by "Yes the quantity has change now"; a fair reader could call it firm.
Omissions found
  • Changes for the worse: the report said falls were "put down to rain, storms and pests". Searching the falls found illness (MNX-1), chickens dying (MNX-1, added), theft (MNX-6), lack of sales and crop varieties (MSX-4, added), poor land (MSY-2, TWX-3) and, weakly, family conflict (MNX-5); no pest passage causes a fall. Sentence rewritten.
  • Savings carrying food through the hungry season: searched all documents; only MSY-1 and MSY-2. Claim stands.
  • Health as a firm cause of income or food: TWX-2 (an "Organisation 2" household) has a firm ~Household health to Diet and nutrition link; the sentence is now scoped to the "Organisation 1" households, where it holds.
  • Chains told whole from "Organisation 1" through farming and production to food: searched; only MNY-3. Claim stands.
Sentences changed in answer.md
  • "Health appears as a firm cause..." scoped to "Among these households" (TWX-2 is outside them).
  • "The falls in income and food ... rain, storms and pests" rewritten with the other causes found and their rows.
  • Limitations: one line added on the health-to-diet rows held weak.

recount.py report: clear (no bare numbers, missing rows or unmatched quotations).

Narrow judgements
  • No household's path firmly passes through better health: rests on the four Household health to Diet and nutrition rows being weak ({m_org1_paths.c13.weak}, MNX-3, MNX-6, MSX-2, MSY-1). A careful reader could read "The motive for this is ... good health" as a stated cause; that would reverse the headline. Line added under Limitations.
  • Most households have paths to income (12 of 15) and to food (12 of 15): many households each; no single row moves it below "most". Stands.
  • Food improves mostly through income (13 of 15): stands under any one reading.
  • Health as an end rather than a step: same judgement as the first; covered by the same line.

The record

This is run 2026-10-13-4nqp. Its ID stays the same through every revision, and the zip's fingerprint, below, names this version of it. This report was drawn directly from the run's zip, by-what-paths-do-households-say-organisation-1-s-2026-10-13-revision-5-8b42fcd7.zip, with Rubicon 0.1.0+26c37889970e. The zip's fingerprint is 8b42fcd75b9d1baef87b7f6204602b250d034a6372505886233ccec171f12ca8.

How that fingerprint is made, and how to check the zip against it and the report against the zip, is told under The record in Annex 1.

Revisions

Changes made after the first report, each recounted and checked before this version was drawn. Earlier versions keep their own files.

  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked for chain_map to be made by the combined code step rather than by a script. Workflow: chain_map is now a code step whose inputs are health_map and change_map, which puts their rows together as one table without coding anything. Since that step requires both codings to define cause and effect alike, change_map and health_map now take one shared factor list (shared_factors.json beside the documents): the health run was revised to take it (revision 4, fingerprint 983d6a5f, with no row changed), and the three steps taken from it now point at that revision. The script that made chain_map was removed. Coding: no passage read again and no row changed; chain_map's rows now carry their original ids from health_map and change_map. Answer unchanged. Recounted the whole workflow; no count moved.
  • 13 October 2026: The plugin was rebuilt so that a path counts a household as explicit only where explicit links alone make it, and reports say "explicit" and "implicit" where they said firm and weak. Recounted the whole workflow. Paths from "Organisation 1" to income and production fell from 12 to 11 of the 15 households naming it (MNX-2 reaches income only through an implicit link), and to savings from 11 to 9. The recount re-sorted the cells, so every cell id the answer cites was remapped to the cell with the same values (remap_cell_ids.py beside the documents). In doing so, three citations in revision 1 were found to point at the wrong cell, and they were corrected: the count for savings, and the two counts for MNX-1's illness reducing income and food, which revision 1 printed as 1 of 15 and 1 of 3 and which are each 1 of the 15. Answer: those citations, and "firmly" and "weakly" changed to "explicitly" and "implicitly" to match the report; no claim changed, since each sentence whose count moved still holds. Coding unchanged.
  • 13 October 2026: Correction to the line above. The count of households with a path from "Organisation 1" to savings did not move: it is 11 of 15 before and after the rebuild. Revision 1 cited another cell that also read 11 of 15, and remapping that citation briefly gave 9; the answer now cites the savings cell itself and reads 11 of 15. The only count the answer cites that moved is income and production, from 12 to 11. Workflow, coding and answer otherwise unchanged; recounted, and no count moved since revision 2.
  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked that every answer in the chapter take who credits "Organisation 1" for which change from the shared household-level step org1_reach, and that every count say what it is out of. Workflow: added the code step org1_reach, taken as rows from the answer on who households credit for each kind of change (run 2026-10-13-q9tg, revision 1, 3df57ac7), and three tabulations of it, t_reach_health, t_reach_food and t_reach_income, by the programme organisation each interview names. Coding unchanged. Answer: the households with a path from "Organisation 1" to better income, food and health now cite those tabulations in place of the p_reach cells, which hold the same households; the four households whose reason lines name good health are now said to be among the households naming "Organisation 1"; the limitation comparing chains told whole with chains joined across passages now says what each count is out of. Recounted the whole workflow; no existing count or row moved.
  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked that the steps the chapter's questions share be made once, in a run of their own that answers no question, and that each question take them from there and from no later run. Workflow: change_map, chain_map and org1_reach are now taken as rows from the shared run (2026-10-13-krvc), which holds this run's change_map rows unchanged, and programme_org, health_links and health_map from the health answer's revision 7, which takes nothing from any question; cells are now named by their coordinates, and the answer cites them that way. Coding unchanged: no passage read or coded again. Answer unchanged in every word and number. Recounted the whole workflow; no count moved.

Every interview at a glance

Each row is one interview, each column a reason as the coding defines it. Click a mark to read the passages.

Only implicitly, so left out of the counts
Hygiene and sanitationFarming practicesProduction and incomeDiet and nutritionOrganisation 1Health servicesGeneral learningOwn effortSavings and financial managementFamily membersOther influenceOther organisations and servicesGovernmentCommunity and neighboursWeather and marketsHousehold health~Production and incomeHealth careFamily relationshipsOrganisation 2Land and soil~Household health~Land and soil~Farming practices~Health care~Family relationshipsClimate and weatherReligious rules and beliefs~Hygiene and sanitation~Diet and nutrition~Savings and financial management~General learningHousehold wellbeing~Household wellbeing
20-45 years
46+ years

Back to question 1

Annex 4 of 7

What changed household wellbeing, and the part family relationships play

Handed over as what-do-households-say-changed-their-overall-2026-10-13-revision-2-7257c876.html.

How this report was written

What was read. Rubicon read all 18 documents in full. The counts below are of households, one document each.

Coding. It then read each document as a whole and coded organisation named (which of the two programme organisations the interview names anywhere in the document). This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also marked every passage that bears on the question and coded relationship (which relationship within the family the passage is about).

Second coding and check. The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here. The two codings differed in 27 places. A reader ruled on each against the text. It searched the documents each count leaves out for passages both coders had missed, and added them. It also checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, so the coding and the answer in this report are the corrected ones, counted again after the check.

Counting. Households were then counted in 8 tables, compared by these codings, and drawn in four causal maps. The annex below gives each.

Writing and checks. Rubicon wrote the answer from these counts, citing for each finding the passages it rests on. Every number in the answer, 29 in all, was computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI, and all 661 quotations were found word for word in their documents.

Revisions. The report was revised twice after it was first drawn, and counted and checked again each time; the changes are listed at the end of this annex.

The workflow x-ray beside Step by step, below, draws the same procedure, a box for each stage and what it made.

Step by step

The method is the same as in Annex 1.

What was read

The same 18 documents, read in full, as in Annex 1.

Coding: Programme org

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 1.

Coding: Change map

one row for each passage that fits; 241 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 2.

Coding: Chain map

one row for each passage that fits; 375 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 3.

Coding: Family kind

one row for each passage that fits; 27 rows.

The instruction a second coder would follow
Read the interview for every passage in which the respondent says that relationships within the family changed, or that they brought about or held back another change (the passages coded as Family relationships, or its opposite pole, in the income, food, relationships and wellbeing coding). For each such passage record which relationship within the family it is about. Do not code relations with neighbours or the community, and do not code the one-word answers to closed questions.
Relationship

Which relationship within the family the passage is about. Weak: the passage hints at the relationship (for instance through 'gender equality' lessons or decisions on spending) without naming who in the family it is between.

CodeMeansCountsDoes not count
Between spousesBetween husband and wife, or between co-wives.Decisions, dialogue, violence, sharing work or money between spouses; conflict or harmony among co-wives; a husband's death ending shared decisions.Care of children (between_generations).
Between generationsBetween parents and children, or between generations of the family.Care, attention or teaching of children; relations with elders or grandchildren.Relations between spouses.
BothThe passage names both a relationship between spouses or co-wives and one between generations.Wives getting along so that the children live in harmony.A passage naming only one of the two.
UnspecifiedThe passage speaks of the household or family as a whole without saying between whom.'Unity at home', 'communication in our house', 'good relations in the household'.A passage that names who the relationship is between.
The coded passages 27 rows
Between spouses 20 passages
  • Because my husband no longer beats us, because our leader and Organisation 1 incriminated my husband so he does not beat women any more
  • My self and my husband we attended training on gender equity where we started having ideas on sharing decisions together.
  • but since we attended the speeches given by Organisation 1 our lives are changing, we now have dialogues in decision making in our houses when we refer to agriculture, food and finance.
  • THE MAIN REASON FOR THIS (NO CHANGE IN PURCHASING) IS LACK OF DIALOGUE, WE DO NOT SHARE THE SAME IDEAS AND THIS DOES NOT HELP FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE FAMILY HOUSEHOLD
  • The reason for this is because we do not have dialogue and ideas are not shared and he does not have time for me as he has many wives.
  • He has 4 wives and this makes it hard to have good relations in the family.
  • but with the passing of my husband things have changed, we used to share ideas when it had to do with agriculture, money and other home related issues.
  • Organisation 1 teaches us how to get along with women in our homes.
  • Organisation 1 Group taught us to respect our wives and family in general.
  • Yes, there has been changes as now we fight in pursue for a better life and good relations, with the help and advice from my wife and had in the Men/Women's group.
  • This is due to the gender equality lessons and know how to listen, this way ideas are shared and we share a lot on what we buy.
  • we are 4 women, in one household, and we are not getting along well because of conflicts in the house
  • In my life and in my family the things that do not extend happiness to us, are that we are not given an ear.
  • ALONG THE LAST YEAR THE RELATIONSHIP IN THE FAMILY AGE HAS CHANGED VERY MUCH BECAUSE I AND MY WOMAN PARTICIPATE IN THE LECTURES AND INTERVIEWS (GENDER EQUALITY) GIVEN BY Organisation 1.
  • The motive behind the change is the fact that before, I thought that because I am a man I am in charge, and I should decide everything alone. I have now learnt that I should get along well with my wives
  • Due to the learning that I share with people at home and results seeing. We listen more and big solutions raise from any challenge faced.
  • Dialogue changed because of openness between involved parties which is a result of counselling held by Organisation 2.
  • As per who decides on speeding money is my husband this changed today we share ideas and experiences also today he accepts my opinion this was thanks to there training on counselling held by Organisation 2 through mothers group.
  • Learned new things from the mother's group like how to do things in the home, how to cultivate the land. Especially my relationship with my husband is much better and we are much happier.
  • Especially my relationship with my husband is much better and we are much happier.
Both 2 passages
  • I have two wives who get along very well, and I as the husband do everything in my position so that the atmosphere within our home is always good, so as my kids live in harmony.
  • I now take better care of the babies and children, all these things I mentioned is thanks to exemplary moms group who go from home to home and teach these lessons promoting change within the community.
Unspecified 5 passages
  • The motive for the changes is in good relations in the household and in the community.
  • The motive is in the change in unity in households due to the creation of the groups created to solve the problems in the society.
  • The reason for change is because there is now unity at home, where ideas are shared and this brought certain changes in my life in my household in particular
  • we participate in speeches that Organisation 1 gave, which changed the way communicate in our house
  • If the family / household has good relationship and good feeding I don't see the reason of things not going well.

Counting: Households

Households by organisation named

The table is the same as in Annex 1.

Counting: Closed wb

Households by how do you think the wellbeing of your household has changed during the past year and a half?

The table 3 cells
How do you think the wellbeing of your household has changed during the past year and a half?Households
Improved of 18
No change of 18
Worse of 18

Counting: Closed rel

Households by overall how have relationships between men and women in your household changed over the last year?

The table 3 cells
Overall how have relationships between men and women in your household changed over the last year?Households
Improved of 18
No change of 18
Worse of 18

Counting: Direct

Households by cause and effect

The table 10 cells
CauseEffectHouseholds
Organisation 1Household wellbeing of 18
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeing of 18
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeing of 18
Household healthHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeing of 18
Other influenceHousehold wellbeing of 18

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Any

Households by effect

The table 2 cells
EffectHouseholds
Household wellbeing of 18
~Household wellbeing of 18

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Paths

Households by cause and effect

A path, a chain somebody told or a loop counts as explicit for a document only where explicit links alone can make it.

The table 142 cells
CauseEffectHouseholds
Farming practicesDiet and nutrition of 18
Production and incomeDiet and nutrition of 18
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold health of 18 +3 implicit
Farming practicesProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Farming practices of 18
Organisation 1Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold health of 18 +4 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutrition of 18
Farming practicesHousehold health of 18 +4 implicit
Health servicesHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Production and income of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial management of 18
Production and incomeHousehold health of 18 +4 implicit
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitation of 18 +3 implicit
Health servicesDiet and nutrition of 18 +2 implicit
Own effortDiet and nutrition of 18
General learningFamily relationships of 18
Organisation 1Family relationships of 18
Organisation 1Household wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutrition of 18
Other organisations and servicesProduction and income of 18
Own effortProduction and income of 18
GovernmentDiet and nutrition of 18
Other organisations and servicesFarming practices of 18
Other organisations and servicesHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Own effortHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutrition of 18 +3 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and income of 18 +2 implicit
Weather and markets~Production and income of 18
~Production and income~Diet and nutrition of 18
General learningHousehold health of 18 +2 implicit
General learningSavings and financial management of 18
Health servicesHygiene and sanitation of 18 +2 implicit
Weather and markets~Diet and nutrition of 18
Family membersProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Family members~Family relationships of 18
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Farming practicesSavings and financial management of 18
General learningDiet and nutrition of 18 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold health of 18 +2 implicit
Health careHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Health servicesHealth care of 18 +1 implicit
Land and soilDiet and nutrition of 18
Land and soilProduction and income of 18
Organisation 2Diet and nutrition of 18
Organisation 2Farming practices of 18
Other influence~Production and income of 18
Production and incomeSavings and financial management of 18
Savings and financial managementHousehold health of 18 +5 implicit
Community and neighboursDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursFamily relationships of 18
Community and neighboursHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersSavings and financial management of 18
Family members~Savings and financial management of 18
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeing of 18 +3 implicit
General learningProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
GovernmentProduction and income of 18
Land and soilHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Land and soilSavings and financial management of 18
Organisation 2Family relationships of 18
Organisation 2Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Household wellbeing of 18
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitation of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Production and income of 18
Organisation 2Savings and financial management of 18
Other influence~Household health of 18
Own effortFarming practices of 18
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeing of 18 +3 implicit
Weather and marketsDiet and nutrition of 18
Weather and marketsHousehold health of 18
Weather and marketsProduction and income of 18
Weather and marketsSavings and financial management of 18
~Farming practices~Production and income of 18
~Land and soil~Production and income of 18
Climate and weatherDiet and nutrition of 18
Climate and weatherHousehold health of 18
Climate and weather~Household health of 18
Family membersFamily relationships of 18
Family members~Household wellbeing of 18
GovernmentFarming practices of 18
Health services~Health care of 18 +1 implicit
Health services~Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Other influenceDiet and nutrition of 18
Other influenceHousehold health of 18
Other influenceHousehold wellbeing of 18
Other influenceSavings and financial management of 18
Other influence~Diet and nutrition of 18
Other influence~Household wellbeing of 18
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesSavings and financial management of 18
Own effortFamily relationships of 18
Own effortHousehold wellbeing of 18
Own effortSavings and financial management of 18
Own effort~Savings and financial management of 18
Production and incomeFarming practices of 18
Religious rules and beliefs~Diet and nutrition of 18
Religious rules and beliefs~Household health of 18
Religious rules and beliefs~Household wellbeing of 18
Religious rules and beliefs~Production and income of 18
Weather and marketsFarming practices of 18
~Diet and nutrition~Household health of 18
~Diet and nutrition~Household wellbeing of 18
~Diet and nutrition~Production and income of 18
~Family relationships~Household wellbeing of 18
~Family relationships~Savings and financial management of 18
~Farming practices~Diet and nutrition of 18
~Health care~Household health of 18 +1 implicit
~Household healthDiet and nutrition of 18
~Household healthHousehold health of 18
~Household health~Diet and nutrition of 18
~Household health~Household wellbeing of 18
~Household health~Production and income of 18
~Household health~Savings and financial management of 18
~Hygiene and sanitation~Household health of 18
~Land and soil~Diet and nutrition of 18
~Production and incomeDiet and nutrition of 18
~Production and incomeHousehold health of 18
~Production and incomeProduction and income of 18
~Production and incomeSavings and financial management of 18 +1 implicit
~Production and income~Household health of 18
~Production and income~Household wellbeing of 18
Community and neighboursProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeing of 18 +2 implicit
Family members~Production and income of 18 +1 implicit
Health servicesHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutrition of 18 +4 implicit
Household healthHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutrition of 18 +4 implicit
Land and soilHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1General learning of 18 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
~Family relationships~Production and income of 18 +1 implicit
~Health careDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
~Health careHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Told

Households by cause and effect

The table 18 cells
ChainHouseholds
Organisation 1 → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18 +3 implicit
Organisation 1 → Farming practices → Production and income of 18
Organisation 1 → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Health services → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18
Health services → Health care → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → Hygiene and sanitation → Health services → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18
Organisation 2 → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
General learning → Production and income → Diet and nutrition of 18
Health services → ~Health care → ~Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → Diet and nutrition → Health services → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → Farming practices → Production and income → Diet and nutrition of 18
Organisation 1 → Savings and financial management → Production and income of 18
Organisation 2 → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 2 → Hygiene and sanitation → Health services → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Health services → Hygiene and sanitation → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → General learning → Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1 → Savings and financial management → Diet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 2 → Diet and nutrition → Health services → Diet and nutrition → Household health of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Map

Households by cause and effect

The table 42 cells
CauseEffectHouseholds
Organisation 1Household wellbeing of 18
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Farming practicesProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersProduction and income of 18
General learningFamily relationships of 18
General learningHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
GovernmentProduction and income of 18
Organisation 1Farming practices of 18
Other organisations and servicesFarming practices of 18
Production and incomeDiet and nutrition of 18
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursFamily relationships of 18
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeing of 18
Diet and nutritionHousehold health of 18
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersFamily relationships of 18
Farming practicesDiet and nutrition of 18
General learningDiet and nutrition of 18
General learningProduction and income of 18
GovernmentHousehold wellbeing of 18
Health servicesDiet and nutrition of 18
Household healthDiet and nutrition of 18
Household healthHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Household healthProduction and income of 18
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold health of 18
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeing of 18
Land and soilProduction and income of 18
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitation of 18
Organisation 1Production and income of 18
Organisation 2Diet and nutrition of 18
Organisation 2Family relationships of 18
Organisation 2Farming practices of 18
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitation of 18
Other influenceHousehold wellbeing of 18
Other influenceProduction and income of 18
Own effortProduction and income of 18
Production and incomeFarming practices of 18
Religious rules and beliefsHousehold health of 18
Savings and financial managementProduction and income of 18
Weather and marketsProduction and income of 18
Community and neighboursProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Fr cause on path

Households by cause

The table 24 cells
CauseHouseholds
Organisation 1 of 18
Farming practices of 18 +1 implicit
General learning of 18
Family members of 18
Family relationships of 18 +1 implicit
Government of 18
Production and income of 18 +2 implicit
Community and neighbours of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitation of 18
Organisation 2 of 18
Other influence of 18
Other organisations and services of 18
Health services of 18
Land and soil of 18
Own effort of 18
Religious rules and beliefs of 18
Savings and financial management of 18
Weather and markets of 18
~Diet and nutrition of 18
~Family relationships of 18
~Household health of 18
~Production and income of 18
Diet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Household health of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Fr effect on path

Households by effect

The table 12 cells
EffectHouseholds
Household wellbeing of 18
Production and income of 18
Farming practices of 18
Family relationships of 18
Hygiene and sanitation of 18
~Household wellbeing of 18
Diet and nutrition of 18
Household health of 18
~Diet and nutrition of 18
~Family relationships of 18
~Household health of 18
~Production and income of 18

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Fr changed

Households by effect

The table 34 cells
EffectHouseholds
Diet and nutrition of 18
Farming practices of 18
Production and income of 18
Savings and financial management of 18
Family relationships of 18
Household wellbeing of 18
~Production and income of 18
~Diet and nutrition of 18
~Savings and financial management of 18
~Family relationships of 18
Hygiene and sanitation of 18
~Household wellbeing of 18
Climate and weather of 18
Community and neighbours of 18
Family members of 18
General learning of 18
Government of 18
Health care of 18
Health services of 18
Household health of 18
Land and soil of 18
Organisation 1 of 18
Organisation 2 of 18
Other influence of 18
Other organisations and services of 18
Own effort of 18
Religious rules and beliefs of 18
Weather and markets of 18
~Farming practices of 18
~General learning of 18
~Health care of 18
~Household health of 18
~Hygiene and sanitation of 18
~Land and soil of 18

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Fr kind

Households by relationship

The table 4 cells
RelationshipHouseholds
Between spouses of 18
Unspecified of 18
Both of 18
Between generations of 18

Writing: Answer

The instruction the answer was written to
Open with a heading naming what changed household wellbeing. State the conclusions first: what households say changed their overall wellbeing and by which paths, counted by household out of all 18, with the households naming "Organisation 1" shown; then what part relationships within the family play along those paths, as a cause, as something that changed, or both, and whether between spouses or between generations. Report chains told whole beside paths joined from several passages, and changes for the worse apart. Write every numbered organisation's name in quotation marks. End with what limits how far the answer can be relied on.

Earlier runs this one builds on

  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: programme org.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: change map.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: chain map.

Passages taken from an earlier run were coded and checked in that run and are not checked again here. Where this answer agrees with an earlier one on passages taken from it, the two do not corroborate each other, because one coding lies under both.

The checks that were run

  • 661 of 661 quotations found word for word in their document.
  • 29 numbers in the answer, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI; 0 written by the AI without a count behind them.
  • 0 citations to passages that do not exist; 0 quotations not in the passage they cite.

Second coding

The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here.

The second coder's rows
  • Family kind: 87 rows

In the run's zip, under check/coded/.

The check

A reader ruled on every place the two codings differed, and checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, correcting the coding and the answer where they were wrong. The answer above is the corrected one, recounted after the check.

The check's record check.md
  • Disagreements ruled (family_kind.relationship, 27 listed): 21 for the first coding's rows, 6 for the second coder, 0 unsettled.
  • Rows changed: 7 (all in family_kind, through the READING table in `work/code_family_kind.py`, rerun).
  • Sentences changed in answer.md: 12 (4 in the opening paragraph, 1 on MSX-4, 2 on relationships that were poor or worse, 1 on relationships between generations replaced by 3, 1 on relationships playing both parts, 3 added under Limitations).
  • recount.py: clear after the changes.

Scope rule applied: a second-coder row counts only where change_map codes that passage, or one overlapping it, with Family relationships. Child-care sentences in the same answer that change_map did not code do not make a passage "both".

Rulings
  • MSX-4, unspecified (first only): "In my life and in my family the things that do not extend happiness to us, are that we are not given an ear." Neither coding stands. The passage does not say who does not listen, and it is not about the household as a whole; her next answer says "I am under my husbands orders". This is the weakness the column names (hints at the relationship without naming who). Changed to between_spouses, weak.
  • MNX-1, both (second only): passage beginning "My husband has changed, he would beat us" is not coded by change_map (its row is the reason line, "Because my husband no longer beats us…"). Outside scope; rows stand.
  • MNX-2, between generations (second only): change_map codes no family-relationship passage in MNX-2. Outside scope.
  • MNX-3, both and unspecified (second only): the relationship answer and "The motive is because we now have better communication…" are not coded by change_map (its row rxpx9 is in the savings answer). Outside scope.
  • MNX-4, between spouses (second only): the second coder's passage ("We both decide at home how we save money…") is outside scope, but the first coding's passage x5ezy, read in its answer, is about the couple: the same answer goes on "we are now a united couple who share the same ideals". Changed from unspecified to between_spouses. Ruled for the second coder's value.
  • MNX-4, both (second only): overlaps x5ezy, but the child-care sentence ("we are more involved in taking care of children") is a separate statement change_map did not code. Between_spouses, as above.
  • MNX-5, both (second only): overlaps c8bz3 ("He has 4 wives…"); the baby-care sentence is not in change_map's passage. Rows stand.
  • MNX-6, both (second only): overlaps nrzyh (husband's death); the child-care sentence is not in change_map's passage. Rows stand.
  • MNY-1, both (second only): passage beginning "We live well…" is not coded by change_map (its row is d7qpa in the savings answer). Outside scope.
  • MNY-2, both (second only): passage beginning "Yes there have been many changes in how we make decisions…" follows f7nyp but does not overlap it. Outside scope; f7nyp ("changed the way communicate in our house") names nobody, so unspecified stands.
  • MNY-3, both (second only): overlaps 4empu, which names "our wives and family in general"; "family in general" does not name a generation. Between_spouses stands.
  • MNY-5, both and unspecified (second only): the long relationship answer and the two reason lines other than gwyda are not coded by change_map. For gwyda, the preceding sentence in the same answer names the spouse ("she gives her opinions when we discuss how to spend money"), so between_spouses stands.
  • MNY-5, between spouses, firm for the second coder and weak for the first: for the same reason gwyda's relationship is named in its answer. Changed to firm. Ruled for the second coder.
  • MSX-1, between spouses and unspecified (second only): change_map codes no family-relationship passage in MSX-1. Outside scope.
  • MSX-2, between spouses (second only): change_map codes no family-relationship passage in MSX-2. Outside scope.
  • MSX-4, both (second only): overlaps kx3gg ("we are 4 women, in one household…"); "each mother takes care of their child" describes the co-wives' conflict, not a change between generations. Between_spouses stands.
  • MSY-1, both (second only): overlaps xkgrc; the child-care sentence is not in change_map's passage. Between_spouses stands. MSY-1, unspecified: the reason line is not in change_map. Outside scope.
  • TWX-1, between spouses (second only): the second coder's spending passage is outside scope, but wxbqq ("Due to the learning that I share with people at home…") is the reason line of the answer that names the husband ("It changed the communication with me and now I am also part of decision making"). Changed from unspecified to between_spouses. Ruled for the second coder's value.
  • TWX-1, both (second only): passages not coded by change_map. Outside scope.
  • TWX-2, between spouses (second only): overlaps w4gy3; the same passage begins "The couple relationship we have for one another is now with dialogue". Changed from unspecified to between_spouses. Ruled for the second coder.
  • TWX-2, both (second only): overlaps qr83s ("I now take better care of the babies and children, all these things I mentioned is thanks to exemplary moms group…"). "All these things I mentioned" takes in the joint decisions and respect between men and women earlier in the answer. Changed from between_generations to both. Ruled for the second coder.
  • TWX-3, both and unspecified (second only): passages not coded by change_map. Outside scope.
Other row changes
  • MNX-5, uv74f ("THE MAIN REASON FOR THIS (NO CHANGE IN PURCHASING) IS LACK OF DIALOGUE…"): not a listed disagreement. Its answer says "My husband makes all decisions and does not listen to my opinions". Changed from unspecified to between_spouses. fr_kind counts do not change, because MNX-5 keeps unspecified through 4778u.

Resulting fr_kind: between_spouses 14 of 18 (was 10), unspecified 4 (was 7), both 2 (was 1), between_generations 0 (was 1). The cell ids changed order: c3 is now "both", c4 "between_generations".

Omissions found
  • None within scope. Every change_map row with Family relationships or ~Family relationships at either end has a family_kind row (the script stops on any it has not read).
  • Outside scope, as a limitation: the scope leaves out passages the question needs on relationships between generations. Answers about the household that speak of care of children (MNX-3, MNX-4, MNX-5, MNX-6, MNY-1, MNY-2, MNY-3, MNY-5, MSY-1, TWX-1, TWX-3), MNX-2's "my father in law, my kids and I all get along well", and the relationship answers of MSX-1 and MSX-2 are not coded by change_map as family relationships. Added to Limitations; the step was not widened.
Sentence changes
  • Opening: "through its lectures and courses" cut; the cited households are not all crediting lectures.
  • Opening: "credits better relationships ({w_direct.c2})" overstated: the cell holds MSX-4, whose link is from poor relationships to poor wellbeing. Now names MNX-5, MNX-6 and TWX-3 as better and MSX-4 as poor.
  • Opening: "the step through which wellbeing changed ({fr_effect_on_path.c4})" cited the count of households where relationships both changed and lie on a path. That cell counts TWX-1 firmly although its link from relationships to wellbeing (jfaj3) is weak. Now cites {w_paths.c46} for relationships as a cause, and names MNX-6 and TWX-3 as firm and TWX-1 as weak for both parts.
  • Opening: fr_kind sentence rewritten to the corrected rows ("only 2 of 18 household speaks of … generations, and 0 of 18 of both" after the recount), and limited to the passages coded as family relationships.
  • MSX-4: "a passage read as weak because it does not say who does not listen" was false of change_map's row cjka9, which is firm. Now says the passage does not name who, with her next answer.
  • "{fr_changed.c10} report them getting worse" and "The relationships that got worse": ~Family relationships includes MNX-5, where relations did not change and were poor ("No change" in her closed answer). Now "poor or getting worse".
  • "Relationships between generations appear firmly in only one household, TWX-2": replaced, after the TWX-2 ruling, by the finding that children appear only beside spouses (TWX-2 qr83s, MSY-2 na9s3).
  • "Relationships play both parts in {fr_effect_on_path.c4}": same overstatement as in the opening; now names MNX-6 and TWX-3 firmly and TWX-1 weakly.
  • Limitations: scope line and two narrow-judgement lines added.
Narrow judgements

recount/tables.md gives no margins for these tables (descriptive, no thresholds), so each finding was traced to its readings.

  • Relationships play both parts in MNX-6 and TWX-3 (firm) and TWX-1 (weak): MNX-6 rests on vgyaa, "unity in households" given in the answer about the community, read as a change within the family. A careful reader could read it as a change in the community. Then only TWX-3 holds firmly. Line added under Limitations.
  • Children appear only beside spouses, and none speaks of generations alone: rests on TWX-2 qr83s read as both. Read as about children alone, TWX-2 is between_generations and the finding reverses for one household. Line added under Limitations.
  • Relationships mostly between spouses (14 of 18): rests on several readings (MNX-4, TWX-1, TWX-2 moved from unspecified). Reversing any one or two leaves spouses the largest group by far, so no line added.
  • "Organisation 1" the source most often named (w_direct.c1, w_paths.c17): rests on change_map rows taken unchanged; not ruled on here.
  • Relationships as a cause mostly unity in the household as a whole: rests on vzqhx and 4778u (unspecified) against t9mh8 (spouses). The definitions do not let "unity at home" be read as naming who, so no line added.

The record

This is run 2026-10-13-s4s8. Its ID stays the same through every revision, and the zip's fingerprint, below, names this version of it. This report was drawn directly from the run's zip, what-do-households-say-changed-their-overall-2026-10-13-revision-2-7257c876.zip, with Rubicon 0.1.0+26c37889970e. The zip's fingerprint is 7257c8763f99e7adb1f9d0d41d08684840f89ea4542ab4d48ef5de8c4e72c0be.

How that fingerprint is made, and how to check the zip against it and the report against the zip, is told under The record in Annex 1.

Revisions

Changes made after the first report, each recounted and checked before this version was drawn. Earlier versions keep their own files.

  • 13 October 2026: The plugin was rebuilt so that a path counts a household as explicit only where explicit links alone make it, and reports say "explicit" and "implicit" where they said firm and weak. Recounted the whole workflow. Households with a path from "Organisation 1" to better wellbeing fell from 7 to 6 (MSY-2 reaches wellbeing only through an implicit link). The recount re-sorted the cells, so every cell id the answer cites was remapped to the cell with the same values (remap_cell_ids.py beside the documents). Answer: "firmly" and "weakly" changed to "explicitly" and "implicitly" to match the report; no claim changed, since the sentence whose count moved still holds. Coding unchanged.
  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked that the steps the chapter's questions share be made once, in a run of their own that answers no question, and that each question take them from there and from no later run. Workflow: change_map and chain_map are now taken as rows from the shared run (2026-10-13-krvc), in place of change_map from the paths answer's first revision and a chain_map made here, and programme_org from the health answer's revision 7; health_map, which only fed chain_map here, is no longer taken; cells are now named by their coordinates, and the answer cites them that way. Coding unchanged: no passage read or coded again. Answer unchanged in every word and number. Recounted the whole workflow; no count moved.

Every interview at a glance

The same as in Annex 3.

Back to question 2

Annex 5 of 7

Who households credit for each kind of change

Handed over as for-each-kind-of-change-households-report-health-2026-10-13-revision-2-2b33fea0.html.

How this report was written

What was read. Rubicon read all 18 documents in full. The counts below are of households, one document each.

Coding. It then read each document as a whole and recorded which of the two programme organisations the interview names anywhere in the document. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also read each document as a whole and recorded what the question asks, with 11 yes-or-no codes besides, each defined in the codebook. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

Second coding and check. The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here. A reader ruled on every place the two codings differed, against the text. It searched the documents each count leaves out for passages both coders had missed, and added them. It also checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, so the coding and the answer in this report are the corrected ones, counted again after the check.

Counting. Households were then counted in 12 tables, compared by these codings, and drawn in seven causal maps. The annex below gives each.

Writing and checks. Rubicon wrote the answer from these counts, citing for each finding the passages it rests on. Every number in the answer, 47 in all, was computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI, and all 786 quotations were found word for word in their documents.

Revisions. The report was revised twice after it was first drawn, and counted and checked again each time; the changes are listed at the end of this annex.

The workflow x-ray beside Step by step, below, draws the same procedure, a box for each stage and what it made.

Step by step

The method is the same as in Annex 1.

What was read

The same 18 documents, read in full, as in Annex 1.

Coding: Programme org

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 1.

Coding: Health map

one row for each passage that fits; 134 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 1.

Coding: Change map

one row for each passage that fits; 241 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 2.

Coding: Chain map

one row for each passage that fits; 375 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 3.

Coding: Org1 reach

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 2.

Counting: Households

Households by organisation named

The table is the same as in Annex 1.

Counting: Cr paths

Households by cause and effect

A path, a chain somebody told or a loop counts as explicit for a document only where explicit links alone can make it.

The table 142 cells
CauseEffectHouseholds
Farming practicesDiet and nutrition of 18
Production and incomeDiet and nutrition of 18
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold health of 18 +3 implicit
Farming practicesProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Farming practices of 18
Organisation 1Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold health of 18 +4 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutrition of 18
Farming practicesHousehold health of 18 +4 implicit
Health servicesHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Production and income of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial management of 18
Production and incomeHousehold health of 18 +4 implicit
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitation of 18 +3 implicit
Health servicesDiet and nutrition of 18 +2 implicit
Own effortDiet and nutrition of 18
General learningFamily relationships of 18
Organisation 1Family relationships of 18
Organisation 1Household wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutrition of 18
Other organisations and servicesProduction and income of 18
Own effortProduction and income of 18
GovernmentDiet and nutrition of 18
Other organisations and servicesFarming practices of 18
Other organisations and servicesHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Own effortHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutrition of 18 +3 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and income of 18 +2 implicit
Weather and markets~Production and income of 18
~Production and income~Diet and nutrition of 18
General learningHousehold health of 18 +2 implicit
General learningSavings and financial management of 18
Health servicesHygiene and sanitation of 18 +2 implicit
Weather and markets~Diet and nutrition of 18
Family membersProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Family members~Family relationships of 18
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Farming practicesSavings and financial management of 18
General learningDiet and nutrition of 18 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold health of 18 +2 implicit
Health careHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Health servicesHealth care of 18 +1 implicit
Land and soilDiet and nutrition of 18
Land and soilProduction and income of 18
Organisation 2Diet and nutrition of 18
Organisation 2Farming practices of 18
Other influence~Production and income of 18
Production and incomeSavings and financial management of 18
Savings and financial managementHousehold health of 18 +5 implicit
Community and neighboursDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursFamily relationships of 18
Community and neighboursHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersSavings and financial management of 18
Family members~Savings and financial management of 18
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeing of 18 +3 implicit
General learningProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
GovernmentProduction and income of 18
Land and soilHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Land and soilSavings and financial management of 18
Organisation 2Family relationships of 18
Organisation 2Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Household wellbeing of 18
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitation of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Production and income of 18
Organisation 2Savings and financial management of 18
Other influence~Household health of 18
Own effortFarming practices of 18
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeing of 18 +3 implicit
Weather and marketsDiet and nutrition of 18
Weather and marketsHousehold health of 18
Weather and marketsProduction and income of 18
Weather and marketsSavings and financial management of 18
~Farming practices~Production and income of 18
~Land and soil~Production and income of 18
Climate and weatherDiet and nutrition of 18
Climate and weatherHousehold health of 18
Climate and weather~Household health of 18
Family membersFamily relationships of 18
Family members~Household wellbeing of 18
GovernmentFarming practices of 18
Health services~Health care of 18 +1 implicit
Health services~Household health of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Other influenceDiet and nutrition of 18
Other influenceHousehold health of 18
Other influenceHousehold wellbeing of 18
Other influenceSavings and financial management of 18
Other influence~Diet and nutrition of 18
Other influence~Household wellbeing of 18
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesSavings and financial management of 18
Own effortFamily relationships of 18
Own effortHousehold wellbeing of 18
Own effortSavings and financial management of 18
Own effort~Savings and financial management of 18
Production and incomeFarming practices of 18
Religious rules and beliefs~Diet and nutrition of 18
Religious rules and beliefs~Household health of 18
Religious rules and beliefs~Household wellbeing of 18
Religious rules and beliefs~Production and income of 18
Weather and marketsFarming practices of 18
~Diet and nutrition~Household health of 18
~Diet and nutrition~Household wellbeing of 18
~Diet and nutrition~Production and income of 18
~Family relationships~Household wellbeing of 18
~Family relationships~Savings and financial management of 18
~Farming practices~Diet and nutrition of 18
~Health care~Household health of 18 +1 implicit
~Household healthDiet and nutrition of 18
~Household healthHousehold health of 18
~Household health~Diet and nutrition of 18
~Household health~Household wellbeing of 18
~Household health~Production and income of 18
~Household health~Savings and financial management of 18
~Hygiene and sanitation~Household health of 18
~Land and soil~Diet and nutrition of 18
~Production and incomeDiet and nutrition of 18
~Production and incomeHousehold health of 18
~Production and incomeProduction and income of 18
~Production and incomeSavings and financial management of 18 +1 implicit
~Production and income~Household health of 18
~Production and income~Household wellbeing of 18
Community and neighboursProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeing of 18 +2 implicit
Family members~Production and income of 18 +1 implicit
Health servicesHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutrition of 18 +4 implicit
Household healthHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutrition of 18 +4 implicit
Land and soilHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1General learning of 18 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
~Family relationships~Production and income of 18 +1 implicit
~Health careDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
~Health careHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Cr direct

Households by cause and effect

The table 72 cells
CauseEffectHouseholds
Production and incomeDiet and nutrition of 18
Farming practicesProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold health of 18 +3 implicit
Farming practicesDiet and nutrition of 18
Organisation 1Farming practices of 18
Diet and nutritionHousehold health of 18 +4 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial management of 18
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitation of 18 +3 implicit
Health servicesDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Production and income of 18 +1 implicit
General learningFamily relationships of 18
Organisation 1Family relationships of 18
Organisation 1Household wellbeing of 18
Land and soilProduction and income of 18
Other organisations and servicesFarming practices of 18
Own effortProduction and income of 18
Savings and financial managementProduction and income of 18 +2 implicit
Weather and marketsProduction and income of 18
Family membersFamily relationships of 18
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
General learningSavings and financial management of 18
GovernmentDiet and nutrition of 18
Health careHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
Health servicesHealth care of 18 +1 implicit
Health servicesHygiene and sanitation of 18 +2 implicit
Family membersProduction and income of 18
Family membersSavings and financial management of 18
Organisation 2Diet and nutrition of 18
Organisation 2Farming practices of 18
Other influenceProduction and income of 18
Production and incomeSavings and financial management of 18
Weather and marketsDiet and nutrition of 18
Community and neighboursDiet and nutrition of 18
Community and neighboursFamily relationships of 18
General learningDiet and nutrition of 18
General learningHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
GovernmentProduction and income of 18
Household healthDiet and nutrition of 18 +4 implicit
Organisation 2Family relationships of 18
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitation of 18 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesProduction and income of 18
Own effortDiet and nutrition of 18
Production and incomeHousehold health of 18 +2 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutrition of 18 +1 implicit
Climate and weatherHousehold health of 18
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeing of 18
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Family relationshipsSavings and financial management of 18
General learningHousehold health of 18 +1 implicit
General learningProduction and income of 18
GovernmentHousehold wellbeing of 18
Household healthHousehold wellbeing of 18 +1 implicit
Household healthProduction and income of 18
Household healthSavings and financial management of 18
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeing of 18
Organisation 2Savings and financial management of 18
Other influenceDiet and nutrition of 18
Other influenceHousehold health of 18
Other influenceHousehold wellbeing of 18
Other influenceSavings and financial management of 18
Own effortFamily relationships of 18
Own effortFarming practices of 18
Own effortSavings and financial management of 18
Production and incomeFarming practices of 18
Production and incomeProduction and income of 18
Religious rules and beliefsHousehold health of 18
Weather and marketsFarming practices of 18
Community and neighboursProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Family relationshipsProduction and income of 18 +1 implicit
Organisation 1General learning of 18 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Co health

Households by cause and effect and org1 health

The table 200 cells
CauseEffectOrg1 healthHouseholds
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionYes of 13
Organisation 1Household healthYes of 13
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionYes of 13
Farming practicesProduction and incomeYes of 13 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthYes of 13 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutritionYes of 13
Organisation 1Farming practicesYes of 13
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationYes of 13 +2 implicit
Organisation 1Production and incomeYes of 13 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementYes of 13
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthYes of 13 +2 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold healthYes of 13 +3 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold healthYes of 13 +3 implicit
Health servicesHousehold healthYes of 13 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Household wellbeingYes of 13 +1 implicit
Own effortDiet and nutritionYes of 13
GovernmentDiet and nutritionYes of 13
Health servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 13 +2 implicit
Organisation 1Family relationshipsYes of 13
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 13
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeYes of 13
Own effortProduction and incomeYes of 13
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionYes of 13 +2 implicit
~Production and income~Diet and nutritionNo of 5
Health servicesHousehold healthNo of 5
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesYes of 13
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthYes of 13 +1 implicit
Own effortHousehold healthYes of 13 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeYes of 13 +1 implicit
Weather and markets~Diet and nutritionNo of 5
Weather and markets~Production and incomeNo of 5
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthNo of 5 +2 implicit
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionNo of 5
General learningFamily relationshipsNo of 5
General learningFamily relationshipsYes of 13
GovernmentHousehold healthYes of 13 +2 implicit
Health careHousehold healthNo of 5
Health servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 5
Health servicesHealth careNo of 5
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationYes of 13
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthNo of 5 +2 implicit
Organisation 2Diet and nutritionNo of 5
Organisation 2Farming practicesNo of 5
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 5
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthYes of 13 +4 implicit
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionNo of 5
Community and neighboursHousehold healthNo of 5
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeingYes of 13 +1 implicit
Family membersProduction and incomeNo of 5
Family members~Family relationshipsYes of 13
Family members~Savings and financial managementYes of 13
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingYes of 13
Farming practicesHousehold healthNo of 5 +1 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingYes of 13 +2 implicit
Farming practicesProduction and incomeNo of 5
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementNo of 5
General learningDiet and nutritionNo of 5
General learningHousehold healthNo of 5
General learningHousehold healthYes of 13 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeingYes of 13
General learningSavings and financial managementNo of 5
General learningSavings and financial managementYes of 13
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingYes of 13 +1 implicit
GovernmentProduction and incomeYes of 13
Land and soilDiet and nutritionNo of 5
Land and soilHousehold healthNo of 5
Land and soilProduction and incomeNo of 5
Land and soilSavings and financial managementNo of 5
Organisation 1Farming practicesNo of 5
Organisation 2Family relationshipsNo of 5
Organisation 2Household healthNo of 5 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Household wellbeingNo of 5
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitationNo of 5 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Production and incomeNo of 5
Organisation 2Savings and financial managementNo of 5
Other influence~Household healthNo of 5
Other influence~Production and incomeYes of 13
Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 5 +1 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingYes of 13 +2 implicit
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 5
Weather and marketsDiet and nutritionNo of 5
Weather and marketsHousehold healthNo of 5
Weather and marketsProduction and incomeNo of 5
Weather and marketsSavings and financial managementNo of 5
Climate and weatherDiet and nutritionNo of 5
Climate and weatherHousehold healthNo of 5
Climate and weather~Household healthNo of 5
Community and neighboursFamily relationshipsNo of 5
Community and neighboursFamily relationshipsYes of 13
Family membersDiet and nutritionNo of 5
Family membersDiet and nutritionYes of 13 +1 implicit
Family membersFamily relationshipsYes of 13
Family membersHousehold healthNo of 5
Family membersHousehold healthYes of 13 +1 implicit
Family membersProduction and incomeYes of 13 +1 implicit
Family membersSavings and financial managementNo of 5
Family membersSavings and financial managementYes of 13
Family members~Family relationshipsNo of 5
Family members~Household wellbeingNo of 5
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementYes of 13
General learningDiet and nutritionYes of 13 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
General learningProduction and incomeNo of 5 +1 implicit
General learningProduction and incomeYes of 13
GovernmentFarming practicesYes of 13
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationNo of 5 +2 implicit
Health services~Health careNo of 5 +1 implicit
Health services~Household healthNo of 5 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeingNo of 5
Land and soilDiet and nutritionYes of 13
Land and soilProduction and incomeYes of 13
Organisation 1Family relationshipsNo of 5
Organisation 1Production and incomeNo of 5
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementNo of 5
Other influenceDiet and nutritionYes of 13
Other influenceHousehold healthYes of 13
Other influenceHousehold wellbeingYes of 13
Other influenceSavings and financial managementNo of 5
Other influence~Diet and nutritionNo of 5
Other influence~Household wellbeingNo of 5
Other influence~Production and incomeNo of 5
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 5
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesNo of 5
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthNo of 5
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingYes of 13
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeNo of 5
Other organisations and servicesSavings and financial managementNo of 5
Own effortDiet and nutritionNo of 5
Own effortFamily relationshipsYes of 13
Own effortFarming practicesNo of 5
Own effortFarming practicesYes of 13
Own effortHousehold healthNo of 5
Own effortHousehold wellbeingYes of 13
Own effortProduction and incomeNo of 5
Own effortSavings and financial managementNo of 5
Own effort~Savings and financial managementNo of 5
Production and incomeFarming practicesYes of 13
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementYes of 13
Religious rules and beliefs~Diet and nutritionNo of 5
Religious rules and beliefs~Household healthNo of 5
Religious rules and beliefs~Household wellbeingNo of 5
Religious rules and beliefs~Production and incomeNo of 5
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeNo of 5 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsFarming practicesNo of 5
Weather and markets~Production and incomeYes of 13
~Diet and nutrition~Household healthNo of 5
~Diet and nutrition~Household wellbeingNo of 5
~Diet and nutrition~Production and incomeNo of 5
~Family relationships~Household wellbeingNo of 5
~Family relationships~Savings and financial managementYes of 13
~Farming practices~Diet and nutritionNo of 5
~Farming practices~Production and incomeNo of 5
~Farming practices~Production and incomeYes of 13
~Health care~Household healthNo of 5 +1 implicit
~Household healthDiet and nutritionNo of 5
~Household healthHousehold healthNo of 5
~Household health~Diet and nutritionNo of 5
~Household health~Household wellbeingNo of 5
~Household health~Production and incomeNo of 5
~Household health~Savings and financial managementNo of 5
~Hygiene and sanitation~Household healthNo of 5
~Land and soil~Diet and nutritionNo of 5
~Land and soil~Production and incomeNo of 5
~Land and soil~Production and incomeYes of 13
~Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 5
~Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 5
~Production and incomeProduction and incomeNo of 5
~Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 5 +1 implicit
~Production and income~Household healthNo of 5
~Production and income~Household wellbeingNo of 5
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionYes of 13 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold healthYes of 13 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursProduction and incomeYes of 13 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingYes of 13 +1 implicit
Family members~Production and incomeYes of 13 +1 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
Health careHousehold healthYes of 13 +1 implicit
Health servicesHealth careYes of 13 +1 implicit
Health servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutritionYes of 13 +4 implicit
Household healthHousehold wellbeingYes of 13 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutritionYes of 13 +4 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeingYes of 13 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold healthYes of 13 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
Organisation 1General learningYes of 13 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Household healthNo of 5 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationNo of 5 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionNo of 5 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthNo of 5 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold wellbeingYes of 13 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsHousehold wellbeingNo of 5 +1 implicit
~Family relationships~Production and incomeYes of 13 +1 implicit
~Health careDiet and nutritionNo of 5 +1 implicit
~Health careHousehold healthNo of 5 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Co food

Households by cause and effect and org1 food

The table 202 cells
CauseEffectOrg1 foodHouseholds
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionYes of 12
Organisation 1Diet and nutritionYes of 12
Organisation 1Household healthYes of 12
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionYes of 12
Farming practicesProduction and incomeYes of 12 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthYes of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Farming practicesYes of 12
Organisation 1Production and incomeYes of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementYes of 12
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthYes of 12 +2 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold healthYes of 12 +2 implicit
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationYes of 12 +2 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold healthYes of 12 +2 implicit
Health servicesHousehold healthYes of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Household wellbeingYes of 12
Own effortDiet and nutritionYes of 12
Health servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 12 +2 implicit
Organisation 1Family relationshipsYes of 12
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 12
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeYes of 12
Own effortProduction and incomeYes of 12
~Production and income~Diet and nutritionNo of 6
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionNo of 6
General learningFamily relationshipsNo of 6
GovernmentDiet and nutritionYes of 12
Health servicesHousehold healthNo of 6
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthNo of 6 +2 implicit
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesYes of 12
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthYes of 12 +1 implicit
Own effortHousehold healthYes of 12 +1 implicit
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 6
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionYes of 12 +2 implicit
Weather and markets~Diet and nutritionNo of 6
Weather and markets~Production and incomeNo of 6
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthNo of 6 +2 implicit
Farming practicesProduction and incomeNo of 6
GovernmentHousehold healthYes of 12 +1 implicit
Health careHousehold healthNo of 6
Health servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 6
Health servicesHealth careNo of 6
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationYes of 12
Organisation 2Diet and nutritionNo of 6
Organisation 2Farming practicesNo of 6
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthYes of 12 +3 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeYes of 12 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionNo of 6 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold healthNo of 6 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeingYes of 12
Family membersProduction and incomeNo of 6
Family members~Family relationshipsYes of 12
Family members~Savings and financial managementYes of 12
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingYes of 12
Farming practicesHousehold healthNo of 6 +2 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingYes of 12 +1 implicit
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementNo of 6
General learningDiet and nutritionNo of 6
General learningFamily relationshipsYes of 12
General learningHousehold healthNo of 6
General learningHousehold healthYes of 12 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeingYes of 12
General learningSavings and financial managementNo of 6
General learningSavings and financial managementYes of 12
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingYes of 12
Land and soilDiet and nutritionNo of 6
Land and soilHousehold healthNo of 6
Land and soilProduction and incomeNo of 6
Land and soilSavings and financial managementNo of 6
Organisation 1Farming practicesNo of 6
Organisation 2Family relationshipsNo of 6
Organisation 2Household healthNo of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Household wellbeingNo of 6
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitationNo of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Production and incomeNo of 6
Organisation 2Savings and financial managementNo of 6
Other influence~Household healthNo of 6
Other influence~Production and incomeYes of 12
Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 6 +2 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingYes of 12 +1 implicit
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 6
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeNo of 6 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsDiet and nutritionNo of 6
Weather and marketsHousehold healthNo of 6
Weather and marketsProduction and incomeNo of 6
Weather and marketsSavings and financial managementNo of 6
~Land and soil~Production and incomeNo of 6
Climate and weatherDiet and nutritionNo of 6
Climate and weatherHousehold healthNo of 6
Climate and weather~Household healthNo of 6
Community and neighboursFamily relationshipsNo of 6
Community and neighboursFamily relationshipsYes of 12
Family membersDiet and nutritionNo of 6
Family membersDiet and nutritionYes of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersFamily relationshipsYes of 12
Family membersHousehold healthNo of 6
Family membersHousehold healthYes of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersProduction and incomeYes of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersSavings and financial managementNo of 6
Family membersSavings and financial managementYes of 12
Family members~Family relationshipsNo of 6
Family members~Household wellbeingNo of 6
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementYes of 12
General learningDiet and nutritionYes of 12 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
General learningProduction and incomeNo of 6 +1 implicit
General learningProduction and incomeYes of 12
GovernmentDiet and nutritionNo of 6
GovernmentFarming practicesYes of 12
GovernmentProduction and incomeNo of 6
GovernmentProduction and incomeYes of 12
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationNo of 6 +2 implicit
Health services~Health careNo of 6 +1 implicit
Health services~Household healthNo of 6 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Land and soilDiet and nutritionYes of 12
Land and soilProduction and incomeYes of 12
Organisation 1Family relationshipsNo of 6
Organisation 1Household healthNo of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationNo of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Production and incomeNo of 6
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementNo of 6
Other influenceDiet and nutritionYes of 12
Other influenceHousehold healthYes of 12
Other influenceHousehold wellbeingNo of 6
Other influenceSavings and financial managementNo of 6
Other influence~Diet and nutritionNo of 6
Other influence~Household wellbeingNo of 6
Other influence~Production and incomeNo of 6
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 6
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesNo of 6
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthNo of 6
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingYes of 12
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeNo of 6
Other organisations and servicesSavings and financial managementNo of 6
Own effortDiet and nutritionNo of 6
Own effortFamily relationshipsNo of 6
Own effortFarming practicesNo of 6
Own effortFarming practicesYes of 12
Own effortHousehold healthNo of 6
Own effortHousehold wellbeingYes of 12
Own effortProduction and incomeNo of 6
Own effortSavings and financial managementNo of 6
Own effort~Savings and financial managementNo of 6
Production and incomeFarming practicesYes of 12
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementYes of 12
Religious rules and beliefs~Diet and nutritionNo of 6
Religious rules and beliefs~Household healthNo of 6
Religious rules and beliefs~Household wellbeingNo of 6
Religious rules and beliefs~Production and incomeNo of 6
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionNo of 6 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsFarming practicesNo of 6
Weather and markets~Production and incomeYes of 12
~Diet and nutrition~Household healthNo of 6
~Diet and nutrition~Household wellbeingNo of 6
~Diet and nutrition~Production and incomeNo of 6
~Family relationships~Household wellbeingNo of 6
~Family relationships~Savings and financial managementYes of 12
~Farming practices~Diet and nutritionNo of 6
~Farming practices~Production and incomeNo of 6
~Farming practices~Production and incomeYes of 12
~Health care~Household healthNo of 6 +1 implicit
~Household healthDiet and nutritionNo of 6
~Household healthHousehold healthNo of 6
~Household health~Diet and nutritionNo of 6
~Household health~Household wellbeingNo of 6
~Household health~Production and incomeNo of 6
~Household health~Savings and financial managementNo of 6
~Hygiene and sanitation~Household healthNo of 6
~Land and soil~Diet and nutritionNo of 6
~Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 6
~Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 6
~Production and incomeProduction and incomeNo of 6
~Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 6 +1 implicit
~Production and income~Household healthNo of 6
~Production and income~Household wellbeingNo of 6
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursProduction and incomeNo of 6 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingYes of 12 +1 implicit
Family members~Production and incomeYes of 12 +1 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +2 implicit
GovernmentHousehold healthNo of 6 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Health careHousehold healthYes of 12 +1 implicit
Health servicesHealth careYes of 12 +1 implicit
Health servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutritionYes of 12 +4 implicit
Household healthHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutritionYes of 12 +4 implicit
Land and soilHousehold healthYes of 12 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 1General learningYes of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Household wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthNo of 6 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsHousehold wellbeingNo of 6 +1 implicit
~Family relationships~Production and incomeYes of 12 +1 implicit
~Health careDiet and nutritionNo of 6 +1 implicit
~Health careHousehold healthNo of 6 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Co income

Households by cause and effect and org1 income

The table 199 cells
CauseEffectOrg1 incomeHouseholds
Organisation 1Farming practicesYes of 11
Organisation 1Production and incomeYes of 11
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionYes of 11
Farming practicesProduction and incomeYes of 11
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthYes of 11 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutritionYes of 11
Organisation 1Household healthYes of 11 +1 implicit
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionYes of 11
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationYes of 11 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementYes of 11
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthYes of 11 +2 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold healthYes of 11 +2 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold healthYes of 11 +2 implicit
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionNo of 7
Health servicesHousehold healthYes of 11
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 7
Health servicesHousehold healthNo of 7 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthNo of 7 +2 implicit
Organisation 1Family relationshipsYes of 11
Organisation 1Household wellbeingYes of 11
Weather and markets~Production and incomeNo of 7
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthNo of 7 +2 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold healthNo of 7 +2 implicit
Farming practicesProduction and incomeNo of 7 +1 implicit
General learningFamily relationshipsNo of 7
Health servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 7
Health servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 11 +2 implicit
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 11
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeYes of 11
Own effortDiet and nutritionYes of 11
Own effortProduction and incomeYes of 11
Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 7 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionYes of 11 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeYes of 11 +1 implicit
Weather and markets~Diet and nutritionNo of 7
~Production and income~Diet and nutritionNo of 7
General learningHousehold healthNo of 7
GovernmentDiet and nutritionYes of 11
Health careHousehold healthNo of 7 +1 implicit
Health servicesHealth careNo of 7 +1 implicit
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationYes of 11
Organisation 1Household healthNo of 7
Organisation 2Diet and nutritionNo of 7
Organisation 2Farming practicesNo of 7
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesYes of 11
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthYes of 11 +1 implicit
Own effortDiet and nutritionNo of 7
Own effortHousehold healthNo of 7
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthYes of 11 +3 implicit
Community and neighboursFamily relationshipsYes of 11
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeingYes of 11
Family membersDiet and nutritionNo of 7
Family membersHousehold healthNo of 7
Family membersProduction and incomeNo of 7
Family members~Family relationshipsYes of 11
Family members~Savings and financial managementYes of 11
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingYes of 11
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementNo of 7
General learningDiet and nutritionNo of 7
General learningFamily relationshipsYes of 11
General learningHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
General learningSavings and financial managementNo of 7
General learningSavings and financial managementYes of 11
GovernmentDiet and nutritionNo of 7
GovernmentHousehold healthYes of 11 +1 implicit
GovernmentProduction and incomeNo of 7
Land and soilDiet and nutritionNo of 7
Land and soilHousehold healthNo of 7
Land and soilProduction and incomeNo of 7
Land and soilSavings and financial managementNo of 7
Organisation 1Diet and nutritionNo of 7
Organisation 1Farming practicesNo of 7
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementNo of 7
Organisation 2Family relationshipsNo of 7
Organisation 2Household healthNo of 7 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Household wellbeingNo of 7
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitationNo of 7 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Production and incomeNo of 7
Organisation 2Savings and financial managementNo of 7
Other influence~Production and incomeYes of 11
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 7
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesNo of 7
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthNo of 7
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeNo of 7
Own effortFarming practicesNo of 7
Own effortHousehold healthYes of 11 +1 implicit
Own effortProduction and incomeNo of 7
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 7
Weather and marketsDiet and nutritionNo of 7
Weather and marketsHousehold healthNo of 7
Weather and marketsProduction and incomeNo of 7
Weather and marketsSavings and financial managementNo of 7
~Land and soil~Production and incomeNo of 7
Climate and weatherDiet and nutritionNo of 7
Climate and weatherHousehold healthNo of 7
Climate and weather~Household healthNo of 7
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionNo of 7 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionYes of 11
Community and neighboursHousehold healthNo of 7 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold healthYes of 11
Family membersFamily relationshipsYes of 11
Family membersProduction and incomeYes of 11 +1 implicit
Family membersSavings and financial managementNo of 7
Family membersSavings and financial managementYes of 11
Family members~Family relationshipsNo of 7
Family members~Household wellbeingNo of 7
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +3 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingYes of 11
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementYes of 11
General learningDiet and nutritionYes of 11 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold healthYes of 11 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeingYes of 11
General learningProduction and incomeNo of 7 +1 implicit
General learningProduction and incomeYes of 11
GovernmentFarming practicesNo of 7
GovernmentHousehold healthNo of 7 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingYes of 11
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationNo of 7 +2 implicit
Health services~Health careNo of 7 +1 implicit
Health services~Household healthNo of 7 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Land and soilDiet and nutritionYes of 11
Land and soilProduction and incomeYes of 11
Organisation 1Family relationshipsNo of 7
Organisation 1Household wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationNo of 7 +2 implicit
Other influenceDiet and nutritionYes of 11
Other influenceHousehold healthYes of 11
Other influenceHousehold wellbeingNo of 7
Other influenceSavings and financial managementNo of 7
Other influence~Diet and nutritionYes of 11
Other influence~Household healthNo of 7
Other influence~Household healthYes of 11
Other influence~Household wellbeingYes of 11
Other influence~Production and incomeNo of 7
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesSavings and financial managementNo of 7
Own effortFamily relationshipsNo of 7
Own effortHousehold wellbeingNo of 7
Own effortSavings and financial managementNo of 7
Own effort~Savings and financial managementNo of 7
Production and incomeFarming practicesNo of 7
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +3 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingYes of 11
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementYes of 11
Religious rules and beliefs~Diet and nutritionYes of 11
Religious rules and beliefs~Household healthYes of 11
Religious rules and beliefs~Household wellbeingYes of 11
Religious rules and beliefs~Production and incomeYes of 11
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionNo of 7 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeNo of 7 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsFarming practicesNo of 7
~Diet and nutrition~Household healthYes of 11
~Diet and nutrition~Household wellbeingYes of 11
~Diet and nutrition~Production and incomeYes of 11
~Family relationships~Household wellbeingNo of 7
~Family relationships~Savings and financial managementYes of 11
~Farming practices~Diet and nutritionNo of 7
~Farming practices~Production and incomeNo of 7
~Farming practices~Production and incomeYes of 11
~Health care~Household healthNo of 7 +1 implicit
~Household healthDiet and nutritionNo of 7
~Household healthHousehold healthNo of 7
~Household health~Diet and nutritionYes of 11
~Household health~Household wellbeingYes of 11
~Household health~Production and incomeYes of 11
~Household health~Savings and financial managementNo of 7
~Hygiene and sanitation~Household healthNo of 7
~Land and soil~Diet and nutritionNo of 7
~Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 7
~Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 7
~Production and incomeProduction and incomeNo of 7
~Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 7 +1 implicit
~Production and income~Diet and nutritionYes of 11
~Production and income~Household healthYes of 11
~Production and income~Household wellbeingYes of 11
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursProduction and incomeNo of 7 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Family membersDiet and nutritionYes of 11 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold healthYes of 11 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +2 implicit
Family members~Production and incomeYes of 11 +1 implicit
Health servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutritionYes of 11 +4 implicit
Household healthHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutritionYes of 11 +4 implicit
Land and soilHousehold healthYes of 11 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Organisation 1General learningYes of 11 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Production and incomeNo of 7 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthNo of 7 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsHousehold wellbeingNo of 7 +1 implicit
~Family relationships~Production and incomeYes of 11 +1 implicit
~Health careDiet and nutritionNo of 7 +1 implicit
~Health careHousehold healthNo of 7 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Co relationships

Households by cause and effect and org1 relationships

The table 197 cells
CauseEffectOrg1 relationshipsHouseholds
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthNo of 12 +2 implicit
Farming practicesProduction and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
Health servicesHousehold healthNo of 12
Organisation 1Farming practicesNo of 12
Organisation 1Household healthNo of 12
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthNo of 12 +3 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold healthNo of 12 +3 implicit
Health servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationNo of 12 +1 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 12 +3 implicit
General learningFamily relationshipsNo of 12
Organisation 1Family relationshipsYes of 6
Organisation 1Production and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementYes of 6
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Farming practicesProduction and incomeYes of 6
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Diet and nutritionYes of 6
Organisation 1Farming practicesYes of 6
Organisation 1Household healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Production and incomeYes of 6
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementNo of 12
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Farming practicesHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Household wellbeingYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeNo of 12
Own effortDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Own effortProduction and incomeYes of 6
Production and incomeHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Weather and markets~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Weather and markets~Production and incomeNo of 12
~Production and income~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Family members~Family relationshipsNo of 12
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementNo of 12
GovernmentDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Health careHousehold healthNo of 12
Health servicesHealth careNo of 12
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationNo of 12 +2 implicit
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationYes of 6 +2 implicit
Organisation 2Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Organisation 2Farming practicesNo of 12
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesNo of 12
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Own effortDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Own effortHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeYes of 6
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersProduction and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Family members~Savings and financial managementNo of 12
General learningDiet and nutritionNo of 12
General learningHousehold healthNo of 12
General learningHousehold healthYes of 6 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
General learningSavings and financial managementNo of 12
General learningSavings and financial managementYes of 6
GovernmentDiet and nutritionNo of 12
GovernmentHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingYes of 6
Health servicesHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Land and soilDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Land and soilHousehold healthNo of 12
Land and soilProduction and incomeNo of 12
Land and soilSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Organisation 1Household wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Family relationshipsNo of 12
Organisation 2Household healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Household wellbeingNo of 12
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitationNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Production and incomeNo of 12
Organisation 2Savings and financial managementNo of 12
Other influence~Production and incomeNo of 12
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeYes of 6
Own effortHousehold healthNo of 12
Own effortProduction and incomeNo of 12
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthYes of 6 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeNo of 12 +2 implicit
Weather and marketsDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Weather and marketsHousehold healthNo of 12
Weather and marketsProduction and incomeNo of 12
Weather and marketsSavings and financial managementNo of 12
~Farming practices~Production and incomeNo of 12
~Land and soil~Production and incomeNo of 12
Climate and weatherDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Climate and weatherHousehold healthNo of 12
Climate and weather~Household healthNo of 12
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Community and neighboursFamily relationshipsNo of 12
Community and neighboursFamily relationshipsYes of 6
Community and neighboursHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold healthYes of 6
Family membersFamily relationshipsYes of 6
Family membersProduction and incomeYes of 6
Family members~Household wellbeingNo of 12
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +3 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingYes of 6
General learningDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold wellbeingYes of 6
General learningProduction and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
General learningProduction and incomeYes of 6
GovernmentFarming practicesYes of 6
GovernmentHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
GovernmentProduction and incomeNo of 12
GovernmentProduction and incomeYes of 6
Health servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +1 implicit
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationYes of 6
Health services~Health careNo of 12 +1 implicit
Health services~Household healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Land and soilDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Land and soilProduction and incomeYes of 6
Other influenceDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Other influenceHousehold healthYes of 6
Other influenceHousehold wellbeingNo of 12
Other influenceSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Other influence~Diet and nutritionYes of 6
Other influence~Household healthNo of 12
Other influence~Household healthYes of 6
Other influence~Household wellbeingYes of 6
Other influence~Production and incomeYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Own effortFamily relationshipsNo of 12
Own effortFarming practicesNo of 12
Own effortFarming practicesYes of 6
Own effortHousehold wellbeingYes of 6
Own effortSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Own effort~Savings and financial managementNo of 12
Production and incomeFarming practicesYes of 6
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +3 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingYes of 6
Religious rules and beliefs~Diet and nutritionYes of 6
Religious rules and beliefs~Household healthYes of 6
Religious rules and beliefs~Household wellbeingYes of 6
Religious rules and beliefs~Production and incomeYes of 6
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthNo of 12 +3 implicit
Weather and marketsFarming practicesNo of 12
Weather and markets~Production and incomeYes of 6
~Diet and nutrition~Household healthYes of 6
~Diet and nutrition~Household wellbeingYes of 6
~Diet and nutrition~Production and incomeYes of 6
~Family relationships~Household wellbeingNo of 12
~Family relationships~Savings and financial managementNo of 12
~Farming practices~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
~Health care~Household healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Household healthDiet and nutritionNo of 12
~Household healthHousehold healthNo of 12
~Household health~Diet and nutritionYes of 6
~Household health~Household wellbeingYes of 6
~Household health~Production and incomeYes of 6
~Household health~Savings and financial managementNo of 12
~Hygiene and sanitation~Household healthNo of 12
~Land and soil~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
~Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 12
~Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 12
~Production and incomeProduction and incomeNo of 12
~Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Production and income~Diet and nutritionYes of 6
~Production and income~Household healthYes of 6
~Production and income~Household wellbeingYes of 6
Community and neighboursProduction and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +2 implicit
Family members~Production and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Health careHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Health servicesHealth careYes of 6 +1 implicit
Health servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +3 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +1 implicit
Household healthHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +3 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 1General learningYes of 6 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Family relationships~Production and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Health careDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Health careHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Co wellbeing

Households by cause and effect and org1 wellbeing

The table 192 cells
CauseEffectOrg1 wellbeingHouseholds
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthNo of 12 +2 implicit
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Farming practicesProduction and incomeNo of 12
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthNo of 12 +3 implicit
Health servicesHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Farming practicesNo of 12
Organisation 1Household healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Farming practicesDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Farming practicesHousehold healthNo of 12 +3 implicit
General learningFamily relationshipsNo of 12
Organisation 1Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Organisation 1Diet and nutritionYes of 6
Organisation 1Farming practicesYes of 6
Organisation 1Household healthYes of 6
Organisation 1Household wellbeingYes of 6
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationNo of 12 +2 implicit
Organisation 1Production and incomeNo of 12
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementYes of 6
Production and incomeDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 12 +3 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Farming practicesProduction and incomeYes of 6 +1 implicit
Health servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Production and incomeYes of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Savings and financial managementNo of 12
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeNo of 12
Production and incomeHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Weather and markets~Production and incomeNo of 12
~Production and income~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Health servicesHousehold healthYes of 6
Organisation 1Family relationshipsYes of 6
Organisation 1Hygiene and sanitationYes of 6 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesNo of 12
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Own effortDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Weather and markets~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Family members~Family relationshipsNo of 12
Family relationshipsHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
General learningHousehold healthNo of 12
General learningHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
GovernmentDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Health careHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Health servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +1 implicit
Health servicesHealth careNo of 12 +1 implicit
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationNo of 12 +2 implicit
Organisation 2Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Organisation 2Farming practicesNo of 12
Own effortDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Own effortHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Own effortProduction and incomeNo of 12
Own effortProduction and incomeYes of 6
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeNo of 12 +2 implicit
Community and neighboursDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursFamily relationshipsNo of 12
Community and neighboursHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersProduction and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Family members~Savings and financial managementNo of 12
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementNo of 12
General learningDiet and nutritionNo of 12
General learningSavings and financial managementNo of 12
General learningSavings and financial managementYes of 6
GovernmentDiet and nutritionYes of 6
GovernmentHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
GovernmentProduction and incomeNo of 12
Land and soilDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Land and soilHousehold healthNo of 12
Land and soilProduction and incomeNo of 12
Land and soilSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Organisation 1Family relationshipsNo of 12
Organisation 2Family relationshipsNo of 12
Organisation 2Household healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Household wellbeingNo of 12
Organisation 2Hygiene and sanitationNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 2Production and incomeNo of 12
Organisation 2Savings and financial managementNo of 12
Other influence~Household healthNo of 12
Other influence~Production and incomeNo of 12
Own effortFarming practicesNo of 12
Own effortHousehold healthNo of 12
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Savings and financial managementDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthYes of 6 +2 implicit
Savings and financial managementProduction and incomeYes of 6
Weather and marketsDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Weather and marketsHousehold healthNo of 12
Weather and marketsProduction and incomeNo of 12
Weather and marketsSavings and financial managementNo of 12
~Farming practices~Production and incomeNo of 12
~Land and soil~Production and incomeNo of 12
Climate and weatherDiet and nutritionNo of 12
Climate and weatherHousehold healthNo of 12
Climate and weather~Household healthNo of 12
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Community and neighboursHousehold wellbeingYes of 6
Family membersDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Family membersFamily relationshipsYes of 6
Family membersHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold healthYes of 6
Family membersProduction and incomeYes of 6
Family members~Household wellbeingNo of 12
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +2 implicit
Farming practicesHousehold wellbeingYes of 6 +1 implicit
Farming practicesSavings and financial managementYes of 6
General learningDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +2 implicit
General learningHousehold healthYes of 6 +2 implicit
General learningProduction and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
General learningProduction and incomeYes of 6
GovernmentFarming practicesNo of 12
GovernmentHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
GovernmentHousehold wellbeingYes of 6
Health servicesHygiene and sanitationYes of 6
Health services~Health careNo of 12 +1 implicit
Health services~Household healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Land and soilDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Land and soilProduction and incomeYes of 6
Other influenceDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Other influenceHousehold healthYes of 6
Other influenceHousehold wellbeingNo of 12
Other influenceSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Other influence~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Other influence~Household wellbeingNo of 12
Other influence~Production and incomeYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesDiet and nutritionYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesFarming practicesYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesHousehold healthYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Other organisations and servicesProduction and incomeYes of 6
Other organisations and servicesSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Own effortFamily relationshipsNo of 12
Own effortHousehold wellbeingNo of 12
Own effortSavings and financial managementNo of 12
Own effort~Savings and financial managementNo of 12
Production and incomeFarming practicesNo of 12
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +2 implicit
Production and incomeHousehold wellbeingYes of 6 +1 implicit
Production and incomeSavings and financial managementYes of 6
Religious rules and beliefs~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
Religious rules and beliefs~Household healthNo of 12
Religious rules and beliefs~Household wellbeingNo of 12
Religious rules and beliefs~Production and incomeNo of 12
Savings and financial managementHousehold healthNo of 12 +3 implicit
Weather and marketsFarming practicesNo of 12
~Diet and nutrition~Household healthNo of 12
~Diet and nutrition~Household wellbeingNo of 12
~Diet and nutrition~Production and incomeNo of 12
~Family relationships~Household wellbeingNo of 12
~Family relationships~Savings and financial managementNo of 12
~Farming practices~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
~Health care~Household healthNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Household healthDiet and nutritionNo of 12
~Household healthHousehold healthNo of 12
~Household health~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
~Household health~Household wellbeingNo of 12
~Household health~Production and incomeNo of 12
~Household health~Savings and financial managementNo of 12
~Hygiene and sanitation~Household healthNo of 12
~Land and soil~Diet and nutritionNo of 12
~Production and incomeDiet and nutritionNo of 12
~Production and incomeHousehold healthNo of 12
~Production and incomeProduction and incomeNo of 12
~Production and incomeSavings and financial managementNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Production and income~Household healthNo of 12
~Production and income~Household wellbeingNo of 12
Community and neighboursProduction and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
Diet and nutritionHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Family membersHousehold wellbeingYes of 6 +1 implicit
Family members~Production and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
Health servicesHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +3 implicit
Household healthDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +1 implicit
Household healthHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +3 implicit
Hygiene and sanitationDiet and nutritionYes of 6 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold healthYes of 6 +1 implicit
Land and soilHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Organisation 1General learningYes of 6 +1 implicit
Organisation 1Household wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Savings and financial managementHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
Weather and marketsHousehold wellbeingNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Family relationships~Production and incomeNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Health careDiet and nutritionNo of 12 +1 implicit
~Health careHousehold healthNo of 12 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Also health

Households by org1 health and also health

The table 4 cells
Org1 healthAlso healthHouseholds
YesYes of 18
NoNo of 18
YesNo of 18
NoYes of 18

Counting: Also food

Households by org1 food and also food

The table 4 cells
Org1 foodAlso foodHouseholds
YesYes of 18
NoNo of 18
YesNo of 18
NoYes of 18

Counting: Also income

Households by org1 income and also income

The table 4 cells
Org1 incomeAlso incomeHouseholds
YesYes of 18
NoNo of 18
YesNo of 18
NoYes of 18

Counting: Also relationships

Households by org1 relationships and also relationships

The table 4 cells
Org1 relationshipsAlso relationshipsHouseholds
NoNo of 18
YesNo of 18
YesYes of 18
NoYes of 18

Counting: Also wellbeing

Households by org1 wellbeing and also wellbeing

The table 4 cells
Org1 wellbeingAlso wellbeingHouseholds
NoNo of 18
YesNo of 18
YesYes of 18
NoYes of 18

Counting: Org1 worse

Households by org1 worse

The table 2 cells
Org1 worseHouseholds
No of 18
Yes of 18

Counting: Reach health

Households by org1 health

The table 2 cells
Org1 healthHouseholds
Yes of 18
No of 18

Counting: Reach food

Households by org1 food

The table 2 cells
Org1 foodHouseholds
Yes of 18
No of 18

Counting: Reach income

Households by org1 income

The table 2 cells
Org1 incomeHouseholds
Yes of 18
No of 18

Counting: Reach relationships

Households by org1 relationships

The table 2 cells
Org1 relationshipsHouseholds
No of 18
Yes of 18

Counting: Reach wellbeing

Households by org1 wellbeing

The table 2 cells
Org1 wellbeingHouseholds
No of 18
Yes of 18

Writing: Answer

The instruction the answer was written to
Open with a heading naming who households credit for each kind of change. State the conclusions first: for each kind of change (health, food, income, family relationships, wellbeing), whom or what households credit, counted by household out of all 18; then, among the households that credit "Organisation 1" for a kind of change, how many also credit another source for it, and which. Report credit for changes for the worse apart. Write every numbered organisation's name in quotation marks. End with what limits how far the answer can be relied on.

Earlier runs this one builds on

  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: programme org.
  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: health map.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: change map.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: chain map.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: org1 reach.

Passages taken from an earlier run were coded and checked in that run and are not checked again here. Where this answer agrees with an earlier one on passages taken from it, the two do not corroborate each other, because one coding lies under both.

The checks that were run

  • 786 of 786 quotations found word for word in their document.
  • 47 numbers in the answer, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI; 0 written by the AI without a count behind them.
  • 0 citations to passages that do not exist; 0 quotations not in the passage they cite.

Second coding

The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here. The second coder's rows were not kept in this run's zip.

The check

A reader ruled on every place the two codings differed, and checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, correcting the coding and the answer where they were wrong. The answer above is the corrected one, recounted after the check.

The check's record check.md
  • Disagreements ruled: none (no passage was recoded in this run; there is no recode/ folder).
  • Rows changed: 0. programme_org, health_map and change_map are taken unchanged from checked runs; chain_map combines them; org1_reach is derived by work/derive_org1_reach.py.
  • Sentences changed: 14. recount.py reports clear (47 counts by id; no bare numbers, missing rows or unfound quotations).
Changes
  • Lead, "seed companies and banks for income": the households crediting "Organisation 1" for income and also another organisation are MNX-3, MNX-6, MNY-2 and MNY-5 ({co_income.c29}), all for "Agriculturel Company A". The bank (MNY-1, change_map.w99rf) is in a household that does not credit "Organisation 1" for income. Now "a seed company".
  • Lead, "health services for ... food": own effort is commoner beside "Organisation 1" for food (6 of 12) than health services (5 of 12). Reordered.
  • Lead, causes of worse changes: added a husband's death (MNX-6, change_map.nrzyh), which is not the family's make-up.
  • Method paragraph: cut the sentence arguing for counting paths (narrates method).
  • Health, "mostly for treatment and for advice on feeding": health services rows also credit hygiene lectures (MNX-5 7hyrd-2, MSX-2 nk8m2-2, MSX-4, TWX-2 tgj25-2). Added.
  • Health, "In TWX-1, TWX-2 and TWX-3 ... credited instead (2 of 18)": three named against a count of two. TWX-3's "Organisation 2" health rows (vjvy8, 6kdqt, 8bfjz) are all implicit. Now names TWX-1 and TWX-2 as explicit and TWX-3 as implicit.
  • Health, "several passages ... named together": dropped health_map.5asph-2 (MSY-1), whose passage names "THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1", not a health service; "several" became "some".
  • Food, "the change with the widest spread of credit": not borne out; health draws on as many kinds of source. Cut.
  • Food, "The government is credited for advice on dropping food taboos": true for only 2 of the 5 households (MNX-3, MNY-3). MSY-1 credits government lectures on varying food (hufvb-2); MSY-2 a disability pension (ah6ss-2); MNY-1 a veteran's income, which reaches food through income (zxjjc). Rewritten.
  • Food, MNX-1 neighbours: "keep the household fed" overstated "we do eat a bit"; now "help to keep", and noted that MNX-1 does not credit "Organisation 1" for food.
  • Income, "mostly a seed company and a bank": the six are four seed-company households, a bank loan (MNY-1) and "Organisation 7" (TWX-1, agejh). Rewritten; replaced the MNY-1 bank citation as the example of the seed company.
  • Income, family members: the explicit households are MNX-1, MNX-2 and TWX-1; MSX-2 holds only implicitly (its savings-to-income link ukzxt is implicit). Added MNX-2's children (8sr5k), which the sentence left out.
  • Income, "MNY-1 also credits the government": MSY-2 does too ({cr_paths.c62}). Added it, citing dvdmt and noting its passage leads with group savings.
  • Income, "the seed bought from the company works alongside the planting the programme taught" with change_map.3mjnb: that passage names a water pump and seeds, not the programme's planting. Replaced with c5amr, which names "the good practices" beside the seeds, and the claim no longer says the practices were the programme's.
  • Worse, "poor sales": no passage says this; TWX-3 names distance to the market and lack of money (aud76); others name a cyclone and bugs. Rewritten.
  • Worse, MNX-1 church: "[§ Health]" was not a row; now cites health_map.yt3ty. The passage links the ban to worse health only; the falls in food, income and wellbeing are reached through the household's other links from illness, and are now said so, with all four cells cited.
Taken rows that look miscoded (not recoded)
  • MSY-2, change_map.dvdmt, Government to Production and income: "It changed a lot we manged to have money with savings done by saving group. And we managed to purchase chicken, also receive pension that support in other needs of the household." The pension is government money (ah6ss-2 names it), but the passage leads with group savings; the sentence now names both.
  • MSY-1, health_map.5asph-2, Health services to Hygiene and sanitation: "WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1" names the government, not a health service. It sits in {cr_paths.c10} and {co_health.c14}; dropped as an example of health services named with "Organisation 1". Named in Limitations.
Omissions found
  • Searched all 18 documents for "Organisation 1" near words of loss or harm (worse, bad, problem, fail, lost): every match describes a past problem the programme helped with (MNY-1, MSY-1, MNX-4). None contradicts {t_org1_worse.c2}.
  • Searched for banks, loans, pensions, veterans, church, neighbours and leaders. MNX-1 "we only own a garden because I leader taught us how to. There are no differences" credits a leader for a practice but no change; MNX-4's community leader intervened in past fights, and the improvement is credited to "Organisation 1". Bank deposits (MNY-1, MNY-2, MSX-1, MSX-2) are savings, not a source of a change. None adds a household to a count the report states; no rows added (taken steps are not changed here).
Narrow judgements
  • "Organisation 1" most credited for health: 13 against 11 for health services ({cr_paths.c6}, {cr_paths.c10}). Health services hold one more household only implicitly; that call and one "Organisation 1" household read the other way would tie them. Line added under Limitations.
  • Most credited for food, income, relationships and wellbeing: margins of 4 or more households over the next source; would stand. General learning ties for relationships but is a practice, which the question rules out as a source.
  • "Seldom credited alone" for health, food and income (alone in 2 of 13, 1 of 12, 2 of 11) and "more often stands alone" for relationships and wellbeing (4 of 6 each): one household read the other way leaves each finding standing.
  • No credit for the worse ({t_org1_worse.c2}): no row, explicit or implicit, makes such a path; would stand.

The record

This is run 2026-10-13-q9tg. Its ID stays the same through every revision, and the zip's fingerprint, below, names this version of it. This report was drawn directly from the run's zip, for-each-kind-of-change-households-report-health-2026-10-13-revision-2-2b33fea0.zip, with Rubicon 0.1.0+26c37889970e. The zip's fingerprint is 2b33fea0a15de551306a1249e7ac63a4d410a7198703adc9f22c6040c3419b8b.

How that fingerprint is made, and how to check the zip against it and the report against the zip, is told under The record in Annex 1.

Revisions

Changes made after the first report, each recounted and checked before this version was drawn. Earlier versions keep their own files.

  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked that every answer in the chapter take who credits "Organisation 1" for which change from the shared household-level step org1_reach, that every count say what it is out of, and that the list of other sources credited for income say which households it covers. Workflow: added five tabulations of org1_reach, t_reach_health, t_reach_food, t_reach_income, t_reach_relationships and t_reach_wellbeing, each counting the households whose own explicit links run from "Organisation 1" to that change, out of all 18. Coding unchanged. Answer: the opening counts of households crediting "Organisation 1" for each kind of change, and the limitation on health, now cite those tabulations in place of the cr_paths cells, which hold the same households; the first paragraph under health, food and income now says that its other sources are counted across all the households, including those that do not credit "Organisation 1" for that change, and the income paragraph names them; one sentence on relationships reworded. Recounted the whole workflow; no existing count or row moved, and the new counts equal the cells they replace.
  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked that the steps the chapter's questions share be made once, in a run of their own that answers no question, and that each question take them from there and from no later run. Workflow: change_map, chain_map and org1_reach are now taken as rows from the shared run (2026-10-13-krvc), which holds this run's org1_reach rows unchanged, with its definitions saying "explicit links" in place of "firm links", and programme_org and health_map from the health answer's revision 7; cells are now named by their coordinates, and the answer cites them that way. Coding unchanged: no passage read or coded again. Answer unchanged in every word and number. Recounted the whole workflow; no count moved.

Every interview at a glance

The same as in Annex 3.

Back to question 3

Annex 6 of 7

Differences by respondent sex and by province

Handed over as how-do-the-accounts-of-women-and-men-respondents-2026-10-13-revision-1-82355718.html.

How this report was written

What was read. Rubicon read all 18 documents in full. The counts below are of households, one document each.

Coding. It then read each document as a whole and recorded which of the two programme organisations the interview names anywhere in the document. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also read each document as a whole and recorded what the question asks, with 11 yes-or-no codes besides, each defined in the codebook. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also read each document as a whole and recorded the highest rung the household's explicit links reach from "Organisation 1", in the order listed, lowest first.

Second coding and check. The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here. A reader ruled on every place the two codings differed, against the text. It searched the documents each count leaves out for passages both coders had missed, and added them. It also checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, so the coding and the answer in this report are the corrected ones, counted again after the check.

Counting. Households were then counted in 18 tables, compared by these codings. The annex below gives each.

Writing and checks. Rubicon wrote the answer from these counts, citing for each finding the passages it rests on. Every number in the answer, 72 in all, was computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI, and all 670 quotations were found word for word in their documents.

Revisions. The report was revised once after it was first drawn, and counted and checked again; the changes are listed at the end of this annex.

The workflow x-ray beside Step by step, below, draws the same procedure, a box for each stage and what it made.

Step by step

The method is the same as in Annex 1.

What was read

The same 18 documents, read in full, as in Annex 1.

Coding: Programme org

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 1.

Coding: Change map

one row for each passage that fits; 241 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 2.

Coding: Org1 reach

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 2.

Coding: Chain map

one row for each passage that fits; 375 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 3.

Coding: Org1 rung

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

The instruction a second coder would follow
For each household, record how far along the chain its own explicit links carry credit to "Organisation 1": the highest rung its links reach from "Organisation 1", read off the coded links and the household-level reach step, not the text afresh. Quote the household's first passage that names a programme organisation.
Reach

The highest rung the household's explicit links reach from "Organisation 1", in the order listed, lowest first. Weak: never; a rung is reached by explicit links or it is not.

CodeMeansCountsDoes not count
No creditThe household's links make no path from "Organisation 1" to anything.Households that do not credit "Organisation 1", including those that name only "Organisation 2".Any explicit link from "Organisation 1".
Practice only"Organisation 1" is credited with a practice (farming, savings, hygiene, health care or learning) and the path reaches none of the changes above it.A path from "Organisation 1" to a practice only.A path on to health, income, food or wellbeing.
HealthThe path from "Organisation 1" reaches better household health, and neither income, food nor wellbeing.A path to better health.A path to income, food or wellbeing.
Income or foodThe path reaches better income and production or better food and diet, and not wellbeing.A path to either.A path to wellbeing.
WellbeingThe path reaches better overall wellbeing.A path to better wellbeing, whatever else it reaches.Anything short of wellbeing.
The coded passages 18 rows
  • We changed our behaviours because we learned from Organisation 1 that the way one behaves contributes to a health status.
  • this was how we were taught to do things (Organisation 1)
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 things have changed for the better
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 we have good hygienic and health practices
  • thanks to the lectures by the ministry of health and Organisation 1 as well
  • with the arrival of Organisation 1, we were taught a lot that has been useful in our household
  • which was implemented by Organisation 1
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1, ever since I participated in the lectures
  • I now plant in lines and I harvest well because we learn with Organisation 1.
  • With the arrival of Organisation 1 I participate in the a lot of lectures
  • BUT WITH THE BASIS OF THE TEACHING OF GOOD PRACTICES from Organisation 1
  • THROUGH THE GROWTH OF LECTURES TEACHED WITH Organisation 1
  • These we learned from Organisation 1.
  • WITH THE HELP OF THE GOVERNMENT AND Organisation 1
  • we also learn from a nutrition promoter from Organisation 1.
  • All this was possible by the learning from Organisation 2.
  • These changes come as a result of training held by Organisation 2 started this January.
  • These was learned from Organisation 2 project.

Counting: Groups

Households by sex of the respondent and name of province

The table 4 cells
Sex of the respondentName of provinceHouseholds
FemaleA of 18
FemaleB of 18
MaleA of 18
MaleB of 18

Counting: Org sex

Households by organisation named and sex of the respondent

The table 8 cells
Organisation namedSex of the respondentHouseholds
Organisation 1 onlyFemale of 12
Organisation 1 onlyMale of 6
Organisation 2 onlyFemale of 12
BothFemale of 12
BothMale of 6
NeitherFemale of 12
NeitherMale of 6
Organisation 2 onlyMale of 6

Counting: Org prov

Households by organisation named and name of province

The table 8 cells
Organisation namedName of provinceHouseholds
Organisation 1 onlyA of 11
Organisation 1 onlyB of 7
Organisation 2 onlyB of 7
BothA of 11
BothB of 7
NeitherA of 11
NeitherB of 7
Organisation 2 onlyA of 11

Counting: Sex

Households by effect and sex of the respondent

The table 27 cells
EffectSex of the respondentHouseholds
Farming practicesFemale of 12
Household healthFemale of 12
Diet and nutritionFemale of 12
Production and incomeFemale of 12
Savings and financial managementFemale of 12
Household wellbeingFemale of 12
Hygiene and sanitationFemale of 12 +4 implicit
~Production and incomeFemale of 12
Family relationshipsFemale of 12
Diet and nutritionMale of 6
Family relationshipsMale of 6
Household healthMale of 6
Production and incomeMale of 6
Farming practicesMale of 6
Household wellbeingMale of 6
Savings and financial managementMale of 6
~Diet and nutritionFemale of 12
Hygiene and sanitationMale of 6 +1 implicit
~Savings and financial managementFemale of 12
Health careFemale of 12
~Family relationshipsFemale of 12
~Household healthFemale of 12
~Household wellbeingFemale of 12
~Production and incomeMale of 6
~Health careFemale of 12 +1 implicit
General learningMale of 6 +1 implicit
Health careMale of 6 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Prov

Households by effect and name of province

The table 32 cells
EffectName of provinceHouseholds
Diet and nutritionA of 11
Farming practicesA of 11
Household healthA of 11
Production and incomeA of 11
Savings and financial managementA of 11
Family relationshipsA of 11
Household wellbeingA of 11
Household healthB of 7
Hygiene and sanitationA of 11 +3 implicit
Diet and nutritionB of 7
Farming practicesB of 7
Family relationshipsB of 7
Household wellbeingB of 7
Hygiene and sanitationB of 7 +2 implicit
Production and incomeB of 7
Savings and financial managementB of 7
~Production and incomeA of 11
~Production and incomeB of 7
~Diet and nutritionB of 7
Health careB of 7
~Family relationshipsA of 11
~Household healthB of 7
~Savings and financial managementA of 11
~Savings and financial managementB of 7
~Diet and nutritionA of 11
~Family relationshipsB of 7
~Health careB of 7 +1 implicit
~Household healthA of 11
~Household wellbeingA of 11
~Household wellbeingB of 7
General learningB of 7 +1 implicit
Health careA of 11 +1 implicit

holds the documents’ full text

Counting: Health sex

Households by org1 health and sex of the respondent and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 healthSex of the respondentOrganisation namedHouseholds
YesFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
YesMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
NoFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
NoFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
NoMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
NoMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0

Counting: Food sex

Households by org1 food and sex of the respondent and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 foodSex of the respondentOrganisation namedHouseholds
YesFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
YesMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
NoFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
NoFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
NoMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
NoMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0

Counting: Income sex

Households by org1 income and sex of the respondent and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 incomeSex of the respondentOrganisation namedHouseholds
YesFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
YesMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
NoFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
NoFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
NoMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
NoMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0

Counting: Relationships sex

Households by org1 relationships and sex of the respondent and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 relationshipsSex of the respondentOrganisation namedHouseholds
NoFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
YesMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
NoFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
NoMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
YesFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
NoMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0

Counting: Wellbeing sex

Households by org1 wellbeing and sex of the respondent and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 wellbeingSex of the respondentOrganisation namedHouseholds
NoFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
NoFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
NoMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
YesFemaleOrganisation 1 only of 9
YesMaleOrganisation 1 only of 6
NoMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesFemaleOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesMaleOrganisation 2 only of 0

Counting: Health prov

Households by org1 health and name of province and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 healthName of provinceOrganisation namedHouseholds
YesAOrganisation 1 only of 11
NoBOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesBOrganisation 1 only of 4
NoAOrganisation 1 only of 11
NoBOrganisation 1 only of 4
NoAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesBOrganisation 2 only of 3

Counting: Food prov

Households by org1 food and name of province and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 foodName of provinceOrganisation namedHouseholds
YesAOrganisation 1 only of 11
NoBOrganisation 2 only of 3
NoBOrganisation 1 only of 4
YesBOrganisation 1 only of 4
NoAOrganisation 1 only of 11
NoAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesBOrganisation 2 only of 3

Counting: Income prov

Households by org1 income and name of province and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 incomeName of provinceOrganisation namedHouseholds
YesAOrganisation 1 only of 11
NoBOrganisation 2 only of 3
NoAOrganisation 1 only of 11
NoBOrganisation 1 only of 4
YesBOrganisation 1 only of 4
NoAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesBOrganisation 2 only of 3

Counting: Relationships prov

Households by org1 relationships and name of province and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 relationshipsName of provinceOrganisation namedHouseholds
NoAOrganisation 1 only of 11
YesAOrganisation 1 only of 11
NoBOrganisation 1 only of 4
NoBOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesBOrganisation 1 only of 4
NoAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesBOrganisation 2 only of 3

Counting: Wellbeing prov

Households by org1 wellbeing and name of province and organisation named

The table 8 cells
Org1 wellbeingName of provinceOrganisation namedHouseholds
NoAOrganisation 1 only of 11
YesAOrganisation 1 only of 11
NoBOrganisation 1 only of 4
NoBOrganisation 2 only of 3
YesBOrganisation 1 only of 4
NoAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesAOrganisation 2 only of 0
YesBOrganisation 2 only of 3

Counting: Sex

Households by reach and sex of the respondent

The table 10 cells
ReachSex of the respondentHouseholds
Income or foodFemale of 12
No creditFemale of 12
WellbeingFemale of 12
WellbeingMale of 6
Income or foodMale of 6
HealthMale of 6
Practice onlyFemale of 12
HealthFemale of 12
No creditMale of 6
Practice onlyMale of 6

Counting: Prov

Households by reach and name of province

The table 10 cells
ReachName of provinceHouseholds
Income or foodA of 11
WellbeingA of 11
No creditB of 7
HealthB of 7
Income or foodB of 7
Practice onlyB of 7
WellbeingB of 7
HealthA of 11
No creditA of 11
Practice onlyA of 11

Counting: Prov org

Households by reach and name of province and organisation named

The table 20 cells
ReachName of provinceOrganisation namedHouseholds
Income or foodAOrganisation 1 only of 11
WellbeingAOrganisation 1 only of 11
No creditBOrganisation 2 only of 3
HealthBOrganisation 1 only of 4
Income or foodBOrganisation 1 only of 4
Practice onlyBOrganisation 1 only of 4
WellbeingBOrganisation 1 only of 4
HealthAOrganisation 1 only of 11
HealthAOrganisation 2 only of 0
HealthBOrganisation 2 only of 3
Income or foodAOrganisation 2 only of 0
Income or foodBOrganisation 2 only of 3
No creditAOrganisation 1 only of 11
No creditAOrganisation 2 only of 0
No creditBOrganisation 1 only of 4
Practice onlyAOrganisation 1 only of 11
Practice onlyAOrganisation 2 only of 0
Practice onlyBOrganisation 2 only of 3
WellbeingAOrganisation 2 only of 0
WellbeingBOrganisation 2 only of 3

Writing: Answer

The instruction the answer was written to
Open with a heading naming the comparison by sex and province. State the conclusions first: how the accounts of women and men respondents differ, and those of province A and province B, in the kinds of change reported and in how often they credit "Organisation 1", each count beside the size of its group; say plainly where the groups are too small to compare and that in province B the households naming only "Organisation 2" cannot credit "Organisation 1". Show each household's reach along the chain as charts stacked by sex and by province. Write every numbered organisation's name in quotation marks. End with what limits how far the answer can be relied on.

Earlier runs this one builds on

  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: programme org.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: change map.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: org1 reach.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: chain map.

Passages taken from an earlier run were coded and checked in that run and are not checked again here. Where this answer agrees with an earlier one on passages taken from it, the two do not corroborate each other, because one coding lies under both.

The checks that were run

  • 670 of 670 quotations found word for word in their document.
  • 72 numbers in the answer, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI; 0 written by the AI without a count behind them.
  • 0 citations to passages that do not exist; 0 quotations not in the passage they cite.

Second coding

The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here. The second coder's rows were not kept in this run's zip.

The check

A reader ruled on every place the two codings differed, and checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, correcting the coding and the answer where they were wrong. The answer above is the corrected one, recounted after the check.

The check's record check.md
  • Disagreements ruled: 0 for the rows, 0 for the second coder, 0 unsettled (no recode in this run).
  • Rows changed: 0. Sentences changed: 14.
Omissions found
  • None. Searched the six men's interviews (MNY-1/2/3/5, MSY-1/2) for falls in food, relationships, health or wellbeing (hunger, conflict, sickness, loss); the only men's rows for a change for the worse are MNY-1 [change_map.bhq7w] and MSY-2 [change_map.mn8aa], both income. MSY-2 "Agriculturel season has not been the best" is said alongside "We are now well fed", so not a fall in food. The "no man" claims hold on the rows, not only on the filtered tables.
Changes
  • Lead: "clearest difference" made "one clear difference" (4 of 6 against 2 of 9 survives one household read the other way). Falls in income by sex (8 of 12 against 2 of 6) marked unclear; falls in relationships, health and wellbeing (3, 3, 2 of 12 women against 0 of 6 men) marked too few to call; "none of which any man reports" kept only for food, where it holds and survives one flip.
  • Lead: stated plainly that province B overlaps with the "Organisation 2" area.
  • Group sizes: "Of the men's, 2 of 18 are in B" read a count out of 18 as if out of the men; rewritten as four cells out of 18 households.
  • Reach: added the women's practice-only household (MSX-4) and the men's health household (MSY-2) so each group's reach adds up.
  • MSX-4: "harvest failed for lack of rain" overstated "produced a lot and not this year. Because the rains were irregular"; "grain" made "maize" (the passage says corns).
  • Relationships quotes: [change_map.xkgrc] (MSY-1) sat after MNY-3's quotation as if a second source for it; given its own clause. MNX-1's passage credits "our leader and Organisation 1"; now said.
  • Province credit: "rests on two or three households" replaced by the one-flip test: none of the province differences is clear.
  • "Almost every household reports health, food and income" overstated (income 5 of 7 in province B); counts given.
  • "Several of these women describe polygamous households and a husband's control of money" rested on two women (MSX-4, MNX-5) and one on money; rewritten with their own words. "widowhood" made "losing her husband" (MNX-6).
  • Province falls: food difference (4 of 7 against 1 of 11) survives one flip, income (5 of 7 against 5 of 11) does not; said so. "Mostly put down to rain" limited to income (4 of 5 province B households: MSX-4, TWX-1/2/3; MSY-2 blames soil); food falls are put down to low income, rain and market distance. "Most are Organisation 2" given as 3 of 5 and 3 of 4. Removed the stray section citation.
  • Limitations: "sex and province are not independent" rested on 2 of 6 men against 5 of 12 women in B, near-equal; replaced with the real overlap (all "Organisation 2" households are women in B). "All the coding comes unchanged" was untrue: org1_rung is derived here.
Narrow judgements
  • Men credit "Organisation 1" for relationships more (4 of 6 against 2 of 9): rests on four men's explicit rows (d7qpa, 4empu, xkgrc, MNY-2) and two women's. One household read the other way leaves a difference; it needs two. No limitations line.
  • Women alone report falls in food (5 of 12 against 0 of 6): stands after one flip; but three of the five are "Organisation 2" households, already said in the text.
  • Province A carries credit further: called too small to compare in the text; no verdict to move.

The record

This is run 2026-10-13-pv88. Its ID stays the same through every revision, and the zip's fingerprint, below, names this version of it. This report was drawn directly from the run's zip, how-do-the-accounts-of-women-and-men-respondents-2026-10-13-revision-1-82355718.zip, with Rubicon 0.1.0+26c37889970e. The zip's fingerprint is 82355718360fbe09aae9f8be3dae258134bfd120b4029533e632cba422c56b7d.

How that fingerprint is made, and how to check the zip against it and the report against the zip, is told under The record in Annex 1.

Revisions

Changes made after the first report, each recounted and checked before this version was drawn. Earlier versions keep their own files.

  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked that the steps the chapter's questions share be made once, in a run of their own that answers no question, and that each question take them from there and from no later run. Workflow: change_map, chain_map and org1_reach are now taken as rows from the shared run (2026-10-13-krvc), in place of change_map from the paths answer, org1_reach from the answer on who households credit and a chain_map made here, and programme_org from the health answer's revision 7; health_map, which only fed chain_map here, is no longer taken; cells are now named by their coordinates, and the answer cites them that way. Coding unchanged: no passage read or coded again, and org1_rung's rows are as they were. Answer unchanged in every word and number. Recounted the whole workflow; no count moved.

Every interview at a glance

The same as in Annex 3.

Back to question 4

Annex 7 of 7

Strong support for "Organisation 1"'s contribution to household wellbeing

Handed over as how-strongly-do-the-accounts-support-the-claim-that-2026-10-13-revision-2-fe815c04.html.

How this report was written

What was read. Rubicon read all 18 documents in full. The counts below are of households, one document each.

Coding. It then read each document as a whole and recorded which of the two programme organisations the interview names anywhere in the document. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also read each document as a whole and recorded what the question asks, with 11 yes-or-no codes besides, each defined in the codebook. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also read each document as a whole and recorded the highest rung the household's explicit links reach from "Organisation 1", in the order listed, lowest first. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-pv88), which asked: How do the accounts of women and men respondents differ, and those of province A and province B, in which kinds of change they report (health, food, income and production, family relationships, overall wellbeing) and in how often they credit "Organisation 1"? And how far along the chain does each household carry its credit to "Organisation 1": not at all, to a practice only, to health, to income or food, or to wellbeing? The answer builds on the earlier answers about influences on household health (8 October 2026, latest revision 13 October 2026), about paths from "Organisation 1" to income and food (13 October 2026), and about who households credit for each kind of change (13 October 2026), taking their coded links and their household-level record of which changes each household's links carry from "Organisation 1", all as they stand. Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each); the respondent's sex and the province are as the list of documents records them. Every count is given beside the size of its group, and no group is compared by share alone. A household reports a kind of change where it has an explicit link into it, for better or worse, counted apart. A household's reach is the highest rung its explicit links reach from "Organisation 1", in the order given; income and food form one rung. Because the three households naming only "Organisation 2" are all women's interviews in province B, credit to "Organisation 1" is also compared among the 15 households naming "Organisation 1". Implicit passages are counted apart from explicit ones and never added to them. Answers to closed questions are context, never evidence of a cause. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here. It also restated each causal claim the documents make as a link from a cause to an effect, each end one of a list of 34 factors. This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

Second coding and check. The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here. A reader ruled on every place the two codings differed, against the text. It searched the documents each count leaves out for passages both coders had missed, and added them. It also checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, so the coding and the answer in this report are the corrected ones, counted again after the check.

Counting. Households were then counted in 3 tables: by organisation named; by reach; by org1 worse.

Verdicts. Rubicon reached its verdicts by rules agreed beforehand. They come from the evaluator's rubric, fixed in the commissioning brief before any document was read for this chapter. “How many of the households whose interviews name "Organisation 1" credit it by name for some change?” (counted against the rule's thresholds) reached strong; “How many households carry the credit past a practice to income, food or wellbeing?” (counted against the rule's thresholds) reached strong; “When "Organisation 1" is credited, are the other causes named for the same change minor or complementary, or usually named as the main one?” (the coded passages read against each level's description) reached strong; “How many households credit "Organisation 1" with a change for the worse?” (counted against the rule's thresholds) reached strong. The overall verdict was strong.

Writing and checks. Rubicon wrote the answer from these counts and verdicts, citing for each finding the passages it rests on. Every number in the answer, 10 in all, was computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI, and all 670 quotations were found word for word in their documents.

Revisions. The report was revised twice after it was first drawn, and counted and checked again each time; the changes are listed at the end of this annex.

The workflow x-ray beside Step by step, below, draws the same procedure, a box for each stage and what it made.

Step by step

The method is the same as in Annex 1.

What was read

The same 18 documents, read in full, as in Annex 1.

Coding: Programme org

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run, which asked: Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 1.

Coding: Change map

one row for each passage that fits; 241 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 2.

Coding: Org1 reach

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 2.

Coding: Org1 rung

one row for each document, read whole; 18 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-pv88), which asked: How do the accounts of women and men respondents differ, and those of province A and province B, in which kinds of change they report (health, food, income and production, family relationships, overall wellbeing) and in how often they credit "Organisation 1"? And how far along the chain does each household carry its credit to "Organisation 1": not at all, to a practice only, to health, to income or food, or to wellbeing? The answer builds on the earlier answers about influences on household health (8 October 2026, latest revision 13 October 2026), about paths from "Organisation 1" to income and food (13 October 2026), and about who households credit for each kind of change (13 October 2026), taking their coded links and their household-level record of which changes each household's links carry from "Organisation 1", all as they stand. Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each); the respondent's sex and the province are as the list of documents records them. Every count is given beside the size of its group, and no group is compared by share alone. A household reports a kind of change where it has an explicit link into it, for better or worse, counted apart. A household's reach is the highest rung its explicit links reach from "Organisation 1", in the order given; income and food form one rung. Because the three households naming only "Organisation 2" are all women's interviews in province B, credit to "Organisation 1" is also compared among the 15 households naming "Organisation 1". Implicit passages are counted apart from explicit ones and never added to them. Answers to closed questions are context, never evidence of a cause. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 6.

Coding: Chain map

one row for each passage that fits; 375 rows.

This coding was taken whole from an earlier run (2026-10-13-krvc). Its passages were coded and checked in that run, whose report shows how, and are not checked again here.

The instruction, the codebook and the coded passages are the same as in Annex 3.

Counting: Households

Households by organisation named

The table is the same as in Annex 1.

Counting: Rung

Households by reach

The table 5 cells
ReachHouseholds
Income or food of 18
Wellbeing of 18
No credit of 18
Health of 18
Practice only of 18

Counting: Org1 worse

Households by org1 worse

The table is the same as in Annex 5.

Judging: Verdict

The evaluator's rubric, fixed in the commissioning brief before any document was read for this chapter.

  • How many of the households whose interviews name "Organisation 1" credit it by name for some change? · level met: strong
  • How many households carry the credit past a practice to income, food or wellbeing? · level met: strong
  • When "Organisation 1" is credited, are the other causes named for the same change minor or complementary, or usually named as the main one? · level met: strong
    In the households that credit "Organisation 1" for a change, the other causes named for that same change are mostly complementary: health services and the government giving the same advice alongside it, a seed company supplying inputs for production, or a side business described as an addition, as in MNX-2's "my own business besides the farm and garden"; another cause is named as the main one only in MNX-1, whose husband's business is "everything we have", and arguably in MNY-3, whose shop pays for purchases beside its farm income. MNY-1's pension and MNX-2's children's support are causes of income in households that do not credit "Organisation 1" for income, so they are not causes of the same change.
  • How many households credit "Organisation 1" with a change for the worse? · level met: strong

Verdict: strong, since the rule for strong holds: breadth is strong; reach is strong; attribution is strong; harms is strong.

The verdicts the rule could reach
strongThe accounts strongly support the claim.
moderateThe accounts moderately support the claim.
weakThe accounts weakly support the claim.

Writing: Answer

The instruction the answer was written to
Open with a heading naming the verdict. State the overall verdict first, then each criterion's level with what the evidence shows, how directly, and against which other causes. Write every numbered organisation's name in quotation marks. End with what limits how far the verdict can be relied on.

Earlier runs this one builds on

  • Across the 18 household interviews, what influences do respondents say brought about changes in their household's health, for better or worse, and how often, counted by household, do they credit the activities of "Organisation 1" for those changes, compared with each other influence and with other organisations and health services? Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each). A claim counts only where the respondent states, in the passage, that something affected the health of household members; credit to "Organisation 1" counts only where the passage itself names it. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run , fingerprint 79695eece5ee347bbb61aaeaa8f76e0654bfe8fad483304eca334564cf1b7a73, held in this run's zip as earlier/run-79695eec.zip; its coded passages for coding: programme org.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: change map.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: org1 reach.
  • How do the accounts of women and men respondents differ, and those of province A and province B, in which kinds of change they report (health, food, income and production, family relationships, overall wellbeing) and in how often they credit "Organisation 1"? And how far along the chain does each household carry its credit to "Organisation 1": not at all, to a practice only, to health, to income or food, or to wellbeing? The answer builds on the earlier answers about influences on household health (8 October 2026, latest revision 13 October 2026), about paths from "Organisation 1" to income and food (13 October 2026), and about who households credit for each kind of change (13 October 2026), taking their coded links and their household-level record of which changes each household's links carry from "Organisation 1", all as they stand. Descriptive, with no rubric; read in the manner of QuIP causal coding. Cases are households (one interview document each); the respondent's sex and the province are as the list of documents records them. Every count is given beside the size of its group, and no group is compared by share alone. A household reports a kind of change where it has an explicit link into it, for better or worse, counted apart. A household's reach is the highest rung its explicit links reach from "Organisation 1", in the order given; income and food form one rung. Because the three households naming only "Organisation 2" are all women's interviews in province B, credit to "Organisation 1" is also compared among the 15 households naming "Organisation 1". Implicit passages are counted apart from explicit ones and never added to them. Answers to closed questions are context, never evidence of a cause. Numbered organisations are anonymised names and are written in quotation marks. Run 2026-10-13-pv88, fingerprint 5d2014f2034052d6f343b8084aa3037df81c155d01812bdc17d888dd5a4618ce, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-pv88-5d2014f2.zip; its coded passages for coding: org1 rung.
  • Run 2026-10-13-krvc, fingerprint 40d2aad77de06e67380b5a15eae085f6ad7096fbc8869bc1c5fba85168159708, held in this run's zip as earlier/2026-10-13-krvc-40d2aad7.zip; its coded passages for coding: chain map.

Passages taken from an earlier run were coded and checked in that run and are not checked again here. Where this answer agrees with an earlier one on passages taken from it, the two do not corroborate each other, because one coding lies under both.

The checks that were run

  • 670 of 670 quotations found word for word in their document.
  • 10 numbers in the answer, every one computed directly from the coded passages rather than written by the AI; 0 written by the AI without a count behind them.
  • 0 citations to passages that do not exist; 0 quotations not in the passage they cite.

Second coding

The same documents were coded again to the same definitions; the run does not record whether a separate coder did it, so it is not called independent here. The second coder's rows were not kept in this run's zip.

The check

A reader ruled on every place the two codings differed, and checked every sentence and quotation of the answer against the documents, correcting the coding and the answer where they were wrong. The answer above is the corrected one, recounted after the check.

The check's record check.md
  • Disagreements ruled: 0 for the rows, 0 for the second coder, 0 unsettled (no passage coded in this run; there is no recode/ folder).
  • Rows changed: 0 (every code step is taken from earlier checked runs, or combines them).
  • Readings changed: 1 (judged/verdict.json, attribution, strong to moderate).
  • Sentences changed: 14.
Workflow against the rubric
  • Breadth: t_rung cells practice_only, health, income_or_food, wellbeing, based on organisation_named = organisation_1_only: out of the 15 households naming "Organisation 1" (tables.md: "15 of 15"). Levels at least 10 / at least 5 / otherwise match the rubric.
  • Reach: income_or_food plus wellbeing; at least 5 / at least 2 / otherwise match.
  • Harms: org1_worse = yes; at most 0 / at most 1 / otherwise match.
  • Attribution: a reading over chain_map rows with a non-"Organisation 1" source as cause and health, food, income, family relationships or wellbeing as effect; descriptors quote the rubric, the moderate descriptor spelling out "mixed".
  • Overall: the strong rule is written as all five combinations of "at least three strong and none weak" (all strong, and each of the four with one moderate); weak as all six pairs of weak criteria; otherwise moderate. Exact.
Attribution reading: changed from strong to moderate
  • Read every chain_map row naming another source for one of the five changes in the 14 households with explicit "Organisation 1" rows (MSY-2 credits "Organisation 1" only for health, and its rival-cause rows concern food and income, so it is not "the same change").
  • Complementary: q5zjc-2, f4d3f, hufvb-2, c4jkn-2 (same advice from health services or the government); c5amr, pt4fw (seed company, beside "good practices"); erkkd, nxr8y, 7mj8m (side income "besides" or "not only dependent on" the farm).
  • Named as main:
  • MNX-1 [change_map.q3u9r] "everything we have is due to business that my husband does and also through savings"; "it is through this money that we make a living".
  • MNY-1 [change_map.zxjjc] "I earn money because I am a war veteran ... and with this income I invest into farms". The earlier answer left this household out.
  • MNX-2 [change_map.6c59w] food "because I have my own business besides the farm and garden"; [change_map.8sr5k] purchases "because I have kids who also sustain me".
  • MNY-3 [change_map.ryx92] "I can buy bicycles, I do have thanks to my informal shop", though the same passage gives "we are taught how to manage a farm" as the motive for higher income, so this one is close.
  • Complementary in most, main rival in four households fits the moderate descriptor ("in some households the other causes are minor or complementary, in others they are named as the main one") better than strong. The overall verdict stays strong (three strong, one moderate).
  • Could it reasonably have gone the other way? Yes. A reader could treat the pension, the side businesses and the children's support as additions beside "Organisation 1"'s farming and savings teaching, leaving only MNX-1 as a clear main rival, and so read it strong. Weak is ruled out: other causes are not usually the main one.
Sentence changes in answer.md
  • Heading names the verdict; opening rewritten for attribution moderate.
  • Dropped "and could not credit it" (Organisation 2 households): not a claim the rows show.
  • Breadth and harms: dropped the margin sentences from the main text; the harms one also claimed the overall would stay strong with one harm, which is no longer true with attribution moderate (moved to Limitations).
  • Reach: removed "Most of them do so by joining passages in their own interview ..." and its citation to a heading; not supported by any row cited. MSX-4 rain now quoted [change_map.25zm5].
  • Attribution: "A seed company supplies the inputs for the planting "Organisation 1" taught" cut to "inputs for better production" (c5amr and pt4fw do not tie the seed to "Organisation 1"'s teaching); "two households out of many" paragraph replaced with the four households and the moderate reading.
  • Harms: causes of falls now cited; "loss" made "theft" and "pregnancy" added, per d39fc and 5e3zk.
  • Limitations: removed "when asked what changed and why" and "we did not check" framing (no document says how the interviews were conducted); removed "Reach joins a household's separate passages ... analyst's connection" (unsupported claim about method); removed the claim that the other three criteria hold so the verdict holds if attribution moves (attribution has moved).
Omissions found
  • MNY-1 [change_map.zxjjc]: government pension named as a main income, missing from the attribution reading's "against" rows. Added.
  • MNX-2 [change_map.6c59w], [change_map.8sr5k]: own business and children named for food and purchases. Added.
Narrow judgements
  • Overall verdict (strong): rests on breadth (15 of 15, margin verdict.breadth.margin.fewer = 6), reach (13, margin verdict.reach.margin.fewer = 9), harms (0, margin verdict.harms.margin.more = 1) and the attribution reading (moderate). With attribution at moderate, any single criterion falling to moderate makes the overall moderate; the nearest is harms, one household. Logged under Limitations. Reading attribution as strong instead only strengthens the finding, so no line for it.
  • Harms: zero org1_worse rows; MNX-1's falls are put down to illness and its husband's business, not "Organisation 1", so no passage read again supports a yes.
Analyst's response to the attribution ruling (13 October 2026)

The check moved attribution to moderate on four counter-examples. Two of them are outside the criterion's scope as the question sets it, which reads attribution in households that credit "Organisation 1" for the same change: MNY-1's pension [change_map.zxjjc] and MNX-2's children's support [change_map.8sr5k] are causes of income in households that do not credit "Organisation 1" for income (org1_income is no for both). MNX-2's business is credited for food "besides the farm and garden" [change_map.6c59w], an addition. That leaves MNX-1 [change_map.q3u9r] as a clear main rival cause and MNY-3 [change_map.ryx92] as a close one, so the reading is restored to strong, and the answer says it could reasonably be moderate. The overall verdict is strong under either reading.

The record

This is run 2026-10-13-eghu. Its ID stays the same through every revision, and the zip's fingerprint, below, names this version of it. This report was drawn directly from the run's zip, how-strongly-do-the-accounts-support-the-claim-that-2026-10-13-revision-2-fe815c04.zip, with Rubicon 0.1.0+26c37889970e. The zip's fingerprint is fe815c0492e984476a29cedcc04b66c0c019919bd05938cc3e8c93afdfc212f6.

How that fingerprint is made, and how to check the zip against it and the report against the zip, is told under The record in Annex 1.

Revisions

Changes made after the first report, each recounted and checked before this version was drawn. Earlier versions keep their own files.

  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked for the title to read as a plain heading. Presentation only: the answer's heading changed from "How strongly the accounts support "Organisation 1"'s contribution to household wellbeing: strongly" to "Strong support for "Organisation 1"'s contribution to household wellbeing". Workflow, coding, the reading and every other word of the answer unchanged. Recounted the whole workflow; no count moved.
  • 13 October 2026: The evaluator asked that the steps the chapter's questions share be made once, in a run of their own that answers no question, and that each question take them from there and from no later run. Workflow: change_map, chain_map and org1_reach are now taken as rows from the shared run (2026-10-13-krvc), in place of change_map from the paths answer, org1_reach from the answer on who households credit and a chain_map made here; programme_org is taken from the health answer's revision 7 and org1_rung from the answer on differences by sex and province at its revision 1; health_map, which only fed chain_map here, is no longer taken; cells are now named by their coordinates, and the answer cites them that way. Coding and the reading of attribution unchanged. Answer unchanged in every word and number, and the verdict stands. Recounted the whole workflow; no count moved.

Every interview at a glance

The same as in Annex 3.

Back to question 5

🔥 Carbon cost of this combined report: Between 0.11 and 36 km driven in an average UK family car

Making this combined report used between 151.6 and 48153 watt-hours of electricity, which is the carbon of driving an average UK family car for that distance. A ballpark only: Anthropic publishes no energy figures, and the run, made in the evaluator's own Claude, records no token counts, so the estimate is made from the run's size. It is the sum of the 7 answers' own estimates, each made from the size of its run: the documents read in full by each coding step, the tables the writer read, and everything the run wrote. That comes to about 3,119,527 tokens read and 309,043 written, at 4 characters a token. It covers the first run and its 19 revisions. The zip holds only the latest state, so each revision is counted at the low end as rereading the tables and writing the answer again, and at the high end as a whole run again.

  • High: 0.39 Wh per thousand tokens read and 1.95 per thousand written, with what was read counted 10 times over for the agent's own overhead. Simon P. Couch, 'Electricity use of AI coding agents', 20 January 2026, https://simonpcouch.com/blog/2026-01-20-cc-impact/: about 390 Wh per million input tokens and 1,950 per million output tokens for Claude Opus, back-solved from Epoch AI's estimate for a 100,000-token prompt with output at five times the input rate, as Anthropic's prices are. The author calls them napkin maths. Our assumption, not a measurement: an agent re-sends its instructions, earlier turns and tool output with every request, so it reads far more than the documents themselves. The low case counts only what was read and written; the high case counts what was read ten times over.
  • Low: the same rates divided by 20, what was read counted once. Oviedo et al., 'Energy use of AI inference, efficiency pathways, and test-time scaling', arXiv:2509.20241: a median 0.31 Wh per query for frontier models, and widely cited estimates overstated by 4 to 20 times. The low case takes the high case's rates divided by the top of that range.
  • 0.124 kg CO2e per kWh. DESNZ greenhouse gas reporting conversion factors, UK grid electricity, 2024.
  • 0.16601 kg CO2e per km. DESNZ greenhouse gas reporting conversion factors, average car of unknown fuel, 2024.

Made with Rubicon, free for Claude: rubicon.causalmap.app